Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 3355
References (28)
Berry, Margaret. 1981a. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 120–145.Google Scholar
. 1981b. Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21: 23–32.Google Scholar
. 1981c. Polarity, ellipticity, elicitation and propositional development, their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange: A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 10 (1): 36–63.Google Scholar
. 1987. Is teacher an unanalysed concept? In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Volume 1: Theory and Description, M.A.K. Halliday & Robin Fawcett (eds). London: Pinter, 41–63.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Exchange structure revisited. Paper presented to research groups at the universities of Cardiff (2014) and with revisions Portsmouth (20151).
. 2015b. Challenging moves and supporting moves in discourse. Paper presented at the International Functional Systemic Congress , Aachen, July 2015.
. In preparation. Exchange Structure and Systemic Functional Linguistics.
Burton, Deirdre. 1980. Dialogue and Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm & David Brazil. 1979. Exchange Structure (Discourse Analysis Monographs 5). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, Martin Montgomery & David Brazil. 1981. Developing a description of spoken discourse. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1–50.Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia, 106–128.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2012. What drives sequences? Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1986. On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective. In Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches, Charles Raymond Cooper & Sidney Greenbaum (eds). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 40–71.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1979. Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: A Festschrift for William Haas, David Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–79. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On Grammar, Volume 1 of Collected Works of Michael Halliday, Jonathan Webster (ed.). London: Continuum, 196–218.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiesssen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. London: Routledge. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In Studies in Social Interaction, David Sudnow (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 294–338.Google Scholar
Martin, James. 1985. Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 11, James Benson & William Greaves (eds). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 248–274.Google Scholar
. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James, Michele Zappavigna & Paul Dwyer. 2009. Negotiating shame: Exchange and genre structure in youth justice conferencing. In Studies in Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, Ahmar Mahboob & Caroline Lipovsky (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 41–73. Reprinted in Martin, James. 2012. Forensic Linguistics, Volume 8 of Collected Works of James Martin, Wang Zhenhua (ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 102–128.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael. 1999. Context in dynamic modelling. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, David. 2014. Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 1 (11): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, David Sudnow (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 75–119.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel & Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7 (4): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija. 1987. The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Wegener, Rebekah & Lise Fontaine
2023. A Functional Approach to Context. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context,  pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Berry, Margaret & Sarah Jane Mukherjee
de los Ángeles Gómez González, María & Maria da Purificação Moura Silvano
2022. A functional model for the tag question paradigm: The case of invariable tag questions in English and Portuguese. Lingua 272  pp. 103255 ff. DOI logo
Forey, Gail
2022. Margaret Berry. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:1  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Berry, Margaret
2021. Inequalities in status: How do they show in discourse and what can be done about them?. Lingua 261  pp. 102924 ff. DOI logo
Elorza, Izaskun, Jorge Arús-Hita & Tom Bartlett
2021. SFL approaches to language dynamics and contrast. Lingua 261  pp. 103098 ff. DOI logo
O’Donnell, Mick
2021. Dynamic modelling of context: Field, Tenor and Mode revisited. Lingua 261  pp. 102952 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Chuanyou & Xing Luo
O’Grady, Gerard
2020. Is there a role for prosody within register studies. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 2:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
O’Grady, Gerard
2021. Intonation and exchange: A dynamic and metafunctional view. Lingua 261  pp. 102794 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2020. Dialogic positioning in Khorchin Mongolian: The temporal and spatial dimensions of propositional engagement in conversations. Lingua 244  pp. 102920 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Dynamism in knowledge exchanges: developing move systems based on Khorchin Mongolian interactions. Discourse Studies 23:3  pp. 386 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Tense in Khorchin Mongolian: an interpersonal perspective. Language Sciences 85  pp. 101371 ff. DOI logo
Bartlett, Tom
2019. Models of Discourse in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Butler, Christopher S.
2019. Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Lise Fontaine & Miriam Taverniers
2019. Introduc​tion. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Gerard O’Grady*
2019. English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Martin, James R.
2019. Once more with feeling. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2  pp. 234 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.