Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 7798
References (30)
Auer, Peter. 2005. Delayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex conversation. In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brazil, David. 1995. A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Ray. 2011. Interruption and uncooperativeness in academic ELF group work: An application of Linear Unit Grammar. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki. [URL] (Last accessed on 18 May 2015).
. 2013. On the other side: Formulaic organizing chunks in spoken and written academic EFL. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2 (2): 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Preliminary findings of the CLUMP project: Spontaneous chunking of incoming text: Cognitive and communal implications for the linear modeling of language. Paper presented at the ChangE Consortium Workshop , University of Helsinki, 8 June 2015.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren. 2008. A Corpus-Driven Study of Discourse Intonation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2015. The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, April 14: 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Brian & Michael McCarthy. 2015. Co-constructed turn-taking. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Ruehlemann (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 430–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Anne-Lise & David Poeppel. 2012. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience 15 (4): 511–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John. R. 1957. General linguistics and descriptive grammar. In Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press, 216–228.Google Scholar
. 1968. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In Selected Papers of J.R. Firth, Frank R. Palmer (ed.). London: Longman, 168–205.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov M. Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mason, Oliver. 2008. Stringing together a sentence: Linearity and the lexis-syntax interface. In Language, People, Numbers: Corpus Linguistics and Society, Andrea Gerbig & Oliver Mason (eds). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 231–248. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2009. Managing interaction. A linear perspective on interactive speech. In Corpora and Discourse – and Stuff. Papers in Honour of Karin Aijmer, Rhonwen Bowen, Mats Mobärg & Sölve Ohlander (eds). Göteborg: University of Gothenburg, 213–221.Google Scholar
. 2009/2012. Chunking in ELF: Expressions for managing interaction. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (2): 217–233. Reprinted in Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 1, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds). London: Sage, 271–286.Google Scholar
. 2012a. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Linear Unit Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 3409–3417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna, Svetlana Vetchinnikova & Ray Carey. 2015. Chunking in language: Units of meaning and processing (CLUMP) project. Paper presented at the ChangE Consortium Workshop , University of Helsinki, 8 June 2015.
McCarthy, Michael J. 2010. Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal 1 (1). (Last accessed on 19 January 2016). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 631: 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monschau, Jacqueline, Rolf Kreyer & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2004. Syntax and semantics at tone unit boundaries. Anglia – Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 121 (4): 581–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2001. Form and Function of Parasyntactic Presentation Structures. A Corpus-Based Study of Talk Units in Spoken English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William. 2005. Syntactic Carpentry. An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Language without grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds). New York: Routledge, 139–167.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John & Anna Mauranen. 2006. Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smart, Cameron. 2013. The role of discourse reflexivity in a linear description of grammar and discourse: The case of IMDb message boards. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Haselow, Alexander
2020. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70],  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Mauranen, Anna
2018. Linear Unit Grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Mauranen, Anna
2022. Linear Unit Grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 865 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.