Article published In:
EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 1 (2001)
Edited by Susan H. Foster-Cohen and Anna Nizegorodcew
[EUROSLA Yearbook 1] 2001
► pp. 99122
Cited by

Cited by 25 other publications

Ajabshir, Zahra Fakher
2014. The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Types of Feedback on Learners’ Pragmatic Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98  pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
AlGhafri, Mahmood , Chahrazed Mirza & Cécile Gabarre
2023. Students Attitudes Towards Oral Corrective Feedback: A Case Study from Oman. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Cornillie, Frederik, Geraldine Clarebout & Piet Desmet
2012. Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL 24:3  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Dabaghi, Azizollah
2007.  A Comparison of the Effects of Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback on Learners’ Performance in Tailor-Made Tests. Journal of Applied Sciences 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ergül, Hilal
2021. Mitigating oral corrective feedback through linguistic strategies and smiling. Journal of Pragmatics 183  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Heift, Trude
2019. A longitudinal observation of technology-mediated feedback for L2 learners of German. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:2  pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Lyster, Roy & Jesús Izquierdo
2009. Prompts Versus Recasts in Dyadic Interaction. Language Learning 59:2  pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Lyster, Roy & Hirohide Mori
2006. INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK AND INSTRUCTIONAL COUNTERBALANCE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28:02 DOI logo
Lyster, Roy & Kazuya Saito
2010. ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
McDonough, Kim & Alison Mackey
2006. Responses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production, and Linguistic Development. Language Learning 56:4  pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
Mifka-Profozic, Nadia
2014. Effectiveness of implicit negative feedback in a foreign language classroom. EUROSLA Yearbook 14  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Moghaddam, Seyyed Reza Mousavi & Fatemeh Behjat
2014. Overt-correction vs. Recasts and Grammar Performance of Iranian Male Learners of English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:4 DOI logo
Netz, Hadar & Orna Fogel
2019. Input-providing vs. output-pushing corrective feedback in dyadic tutoring sessions. System 87  pp. 102159 ff. DOI logo
Nikoopour, Jahanbakhsh & Abdolsaleh Zoghi
2014. Analyzing EFL Learners’ Errors: The Plausibility of Teachers’ Feedbacks and Students’ Uptakes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:1 DOI logo
Rast, Rebekah & Edith Taïeb
2008. Présentation. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère :27  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Sagarra, Nuria & Rebekha Abbuhl
2013. Optimizing the Noticing of Recasts via Computer‐Delivered Feedback: Evidence That Oral Input Enhancement and Working Memory Help Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal 97:1  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
2007. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly 41:2  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Sungsoo Jang
2011. Corrective Feedback and Language Anxiety in L2 Processing and Achievement. English Teaching 66:2  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Trofimovich, Pavel, Kim McDonough, Phung Dao & Dato Abashidze
2022. Attitudinal bias, individual differences, and second language speakers’ interactional performance . Applied Linguistics Review 13:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Tsao, Jui-Jung, Wen-Ta Tseng, Tsung-Yuan Hsiao, Chaochang Wang & Andy Xuesong Gao
2021. Toward a Motivation-Regulated Learner Engagement WCF Model of L2 Writing Performance. SAGE Open 11:2  pp. 215824402110231 ff. DOI logo
Varnosfadrani, Azizollah Dabaghi & Helen Basturkmen
2009. The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System 37:1  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Da
2024. Feedback seeking abilities of L2 writers using ChatGPT: a mixed method multiple case study. Kybernetes DOI logo
Yang, Juan
2016. Learners' oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency level and types of error. System 61  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
박휴용 & 노석준
2012. A Discussion on Pedagogic Strategies for Multicultural Classrooms: Principles and Approaches of the CEMP Model. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies 24:2  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
설수연 & 김영규
2013. A Study on Differences in Students' and Teachers' Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Teacher Feedback in Korean as a Second Language. Journal of Korean Language Education 24:3  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.