This article considers recent explanations of variability in the second language (L2) comprehension of inflectional morphology. The predictions of five accounts are spelled out: the emergentist account, the Feature Assembly Hypothesis, the Contextual Complexity Hypothesis, the Morphological Underspecification Hypothesis and the Combinatorial Variability Hypothesis. These predictions are checked against the results of an experimental study on the L2 acquisition of inflectional morphology (based on an extension of Slabakova and Gajdos 2008). English-native learners of German at beginning and intermediate proficiency levels took a multiple-choice test where they had to supply appropriate missing subjects. The predictions of the Morphological Underspecification Hypothesis and the Combinatorial Variability Hypothesis were largely supported by the experimental findings. It is argued that only accounts looking at mental representation of lexical features adequately explain L2 morphological variability.
Chan, Gwendoline Laurissa, Mohammad Issack Santally & Jack Whitehead
2022. Gamification as technology enabler in SEN and DHH education. Education and Information Technologies 27:7 ► pp. 9031 ff.
Kwame, Abukari & Marit Westergaard
2020. The acquisition of English articles among L1 Dagbani L2 English learners. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:4 ► pp. 496 ff.
2016. The acquisition of verbal paradigms in Dutch and Greek L2 children: Cross-linguistic differences and inflectional defaults. International Journal of Bilingualism 20:4 ► pp. 386 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.