Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 40:2 (2019) ► pp.115–143

Grammaticalization of semi-modals of necessity in Asian Englishes

| University of the Balearic Islands
The decline of central modal must and the increase in frequency of the semi-modals have (got) to, need (to), and want to is one of the most conspicuous grammatical changes that inner-circle varieties of English underwent in the second half of the 20th century. Such a replacement correlates with the increasing grammaticalization of the semi-modals in terms of semantic and quantitative developments. The current paper explores the differential grammaticalization of these items in four Asian varieties of English – those spoken in India, Hong Kong, Singapore, and the Philippines – with the aim of building a grammaticalization index that will allow us to measure the extent to which the replacement of modal must with the semi-modals is completed in each of the varieties as compared to British English. After analyzing data from the private dialogue sections of the corresponding ICE corpora, Hong Kong English is shown to be the variety in which the replacement is closest to British English, followed by the Philippines, Singapore and India.
Keywords: semi-modals, necessity, grammaticalization, modal must , Asian Englishes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
  • 3.Theoretical background
    • 3.1Grammaticalization in contact varieties
    • 3.2Degrees of grammaticalization and grammaticalization indices
  • 4.Data and methods
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Frequencies of the core and semi-modals of necessity
    • 5.2Measuring degree of grammaticalization in world Englishes
      • 5.2.1 Must and semi-modal competitors in BrE, HKE, and IndE
      • 5.2.2 Must and semi-modal competitors in SgE
      • 5.2.3 Must and semi-modal competitors in PhilE
    • 5.3Summary and grammaticalization index
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00025.lou
References (66)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.2.4). Tokyo: Waseda University <[URL]>.
Bailey, Guy, Tom Wilke, Jan Tillery, and Lori Sand. 1991. “The Apparent Time Construct”. Language Variation and Change 31: 241–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Philip, and Anand Syea, eds. 1996. Changing Meaning, Changing Functions: Papers Relating to Grammaticalization in Contact Languages. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2010. “ Must in Singapore English”. Lingua 1201: 1727–1737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bautista, Maria L. S. 2001. “Studies of Philippine English: Implications for English Language Teaching in the Philippines”. Journal of Southeast Asian Education 21: 271–293.Google Scholar
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga. 2009. “A Survey on Language Use, Attitudes, and Identity in Relation to Philippine English among Young Generation Filipinos: An Initial Sample from a Private University”. Philippine ESL Journal 31: 74–107.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2012. Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bruyn, Adrienne. 2009. “Grammaticalization in Creoles. Ordinary and Not-So-Ordinary Cases”. Studies in Language 331: 312–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. “Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency”. In Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, eds. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Usage-Based Theory and Grammaticalization”. In Bernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, eds. Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–78.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2009. “Modals and Quasi-Modals in World Englishes”. World Englishes 281: 281–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. “Grammatical Colloquialism and the English Quasi-Modals: A Comparative Study”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 155–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. “Grammatical Variation in English Worldwide: The Role of Colloquialization”. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 81: 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, and Xinyue Yao. 2014. “Modality in Philippine English: A Diachronic Study”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 68–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric. 2011. “The Modal Verb Would in Spoken and Written Philippine English”. In Maria Lourdes Bautista, ed. Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English. Manila: Anvil Publishing, 51–74.Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke. 2017. “The ICE Metadata and the Study of Hong Kong English”. World Englishes 361: 471–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2009. “Colonial Lag, Colonial Innovation or Simply Language Change?”. In Günter Rohdenburg, and Julia Schlütter, eds. One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. “ Do-Support in New Zealand and Australian English”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–86.Google Scholar
. 2015b. “World Englishes”. In Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 381–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds. 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology <[URL]> (accessed March 15, 2016).
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred, and Ole Schützler. 2013. “Recent Change and Grammaticalization”. In Bas Aarts, Geoffrey Leech, Joanne Close, and Jeremy Smith, eds. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191: 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change. Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. “The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Robert Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 223–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “The Modals ARE Declining”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 161: 547–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e stile 201: 303–318.Google Scholar
. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2009. The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750–1710) . Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2016. “(Semi-)Modals of Necessity in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes”. In Elena Seoane, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez, eds. World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–172.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “British English / American English Grammar: Convergence in Writing, Divergence in Speech?” Anglia 1251: 84–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Cross-Variety Diachronic Drifts and Ephemeral Regional Contrasts. An Analysis of Modality in the Extended Brown Family of Corpora and what it Can Tell us about the New Englishes”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–146.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2008. Language Evolution. Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. “Steady States in the Evolution of New Englishes: Present-Day Indian English as an Equilibrium”. Journal of English Linguistics 351: 157–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. “Collostructional Nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-Construction Associations in the International Corpus of English”. English World-Wide 301: 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marco Schilk. 2012. “Exploring Variation and Change in New Englishes. Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and Beyond”. In Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–199.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald. 2005. “Expressing Future Time in Philippine English”. In Danilo T. Dayak, and J. Stephen Quakenbush, eds. Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 41–59.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, Bertus van Rooy, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. 2014. Special Issue on Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 3–88.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, and Johan van der Auwera. 2015. “Recent Quantitative Changes in the Use of Modals and Quasi-Modals in the Hong Kong, British and American Printed Press. Exploring the Potential of Factiva® for the Diachronic Investigation of World Englishes”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 437–464.Google Scholar
Pefianco Martin, Isabel. 2014. “English Language Teaching in the Philippines”. World Englishes 331: 472–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas. 2009. “Hiberno-English Medial-Object Perfects Reconsidered: A Case of Contact-Induced Grammaticalization”. Studies in Language 331: 528–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rossouw, Ronel, and Bertus van Rooy. 2012. “Diachronic Changes in Modality in South African English”. English World-Wide 331: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmied, Josef. 1994. “Syntactic Style Variation in Indian English”. In Günther Blaicher, and Brigitte Glaser, eds. Anglistentag 1993 Eichstätt: Proceedings. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 217–232.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2005. “The Subjunctive in Philippine English”. In Danilo T. Dayak, and J. Stephen Quakenbush, eds. Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 27–40.Google Scholar
2007. Postcolonial Englishes: Varieties of English around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedlatschek, Andreas. 2009. Contemporary Indian English. Variation and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2003. “Changes in the Modals and Semi-Modals of Strong Obligation and Epistemic Necessity in Recent British English”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Robert Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 241–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic change”. Language 651: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. “Review of Baker & Syea (1996)”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 141: 208–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël, and Astrid de Wit. 2012. “The Diverging Need (to)’s of Asian Englishes”. In Marianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 54–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2012. “Grammaticalization Clines in Space: Zooming in on Synchronic Traces of Diffusion Processes”. In Björn Wiemer, Bernhard Wälchli, and Björn Hansen, eds. Grammatical Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 233–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English Auxiliaries. Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Ronel, and Bertus van Rooy. 2014. “The Development of Modals of Obligation and Necessity in White South African English through Contact with Afrikaans”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2009. “Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes”. World Englishes 281: 421–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra P. 2000. Hypothetical Modality: Grammaticalisation in an L2 Dialect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “Replica Grammaticalisation as Recapitulation. The Other Side of Contact”. Diachronica 311: 106–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Nie, Chunyuan
2024. Exploring variation in English as a lingua franca: Multivariate analysis of modal verbs of obligation and necessity in the VOICE corpus. ICAME Journal 48:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Basile, Carmelo Alessandro
2023. Necessity modal development in Singapore English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:2 ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter
2023. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English World-Wide. Journal of English Linguistics 51:3 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Davydova, Julia
2023. Tracking global English changes through local data: Intensifiers in German Learner English. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Laliberté, Catherine
2022. A Diachronic Study of Modals and Semi-modals in Indian English Newspapers. Journal of English Linguistics 50:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Morin, Cameron & Carmelo Alessandro Basile
2022. Elicitation and experimentation: implications for English sociolinguistics. Anglophonia :34 DOI logo
Kranich, Svenja, Elisabeth Hampel & Hanna Bruns
2020. Changes in the modal domain in different varieties of English as potential effects of democratization. Language Sciences 79 ► pp. 101271 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2020. (Un)democratic Epicene Pronouns in Asian Englishes: A Register Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 48:3 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2020. Linguistic Colloquialisation, Democratisation and Gender in Asian Englishes. In Gender in World Englishes, ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2021. Linguistic democratization in HKE across registers: The effects of prescriptivism. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.