Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 40:2 (2019) ► pp.144–169

Intergroup dynamics and variation in postcolonial ESL varieties

A preliminary view of Namibian English vowel systems

| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| University of Hamburg
L1 background is often described as the main factor accounting for variation in postcolonial ESL varieties. However, recent studies (e.g. Mesthrie 2009, 2017) suggest that variation patterns in ESL varieties can in some cases also be linked to identity factors rooted in local patterns of intergroup relations. This study examines the interrelation between L1 background and such identity factors in the phonetic patterns found in the English varieties spoken in Namibia. The data consist of a corpus of careful style elicited via sociolinguistic interviews from an ethnically stratified sample of L2 English speaking Namibian students with Afrikaans, Bantu languages (Oshiwambo and Otjiherero), and Khoekhoeghowab as L1s. Individual speakers tend to be related in their phonetic behaviors if they share the same L1. However, some features cannot be directly attributed to L1 background, so their distribution is best read against the background of Namibian inter-ethnic relations and ethnolinguistic vitality differentials.
Keywords: sociophonetics, sociolinguistics, language contact, ethnicity, gender, Namibia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Predicting internal variability of ESLs
  • 3.Namibia’s sociolinguistic ecology and hypotheses on variation in Namibian English
  • 4.Sample, data and methods
  • 5.Monophthongs
  • 6.Diphthongs
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00026.ste
References (68)
References
Adank, Patty, Roel Smits, and Roeland Van Hout. 2004. “A Comparison of Vowel Normalization Procedures for Language Variation Research”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1161: 3099–3107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bekker, Ian. 2014. “The KIT-Split in South African English. A Critical Review”. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Languages Studies 321: 113–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2001. “Back in Style: Reworking Audience Design”. In Penelope Eckert, and John Rickford, eds. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–169.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2019. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 6.0.48. <[URL]> (accessed February 17, 2019).
Botha, Christo. 2007. “Internal Colonization and an Oppressed Minority? The Dynamics of Relations between Germans and Afrikaners against the Background of Constructing a Colonial State in Namibia”. Journal of Namibian Studies 21: 7–50.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard Y., Lena C. Moise, Stephane Perreault, and Sacha Senecal. 1997. “Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach”. International Journal of Psychology 321: 369–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Sean. 2004. “White South African English: Phonology”. In Edgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume I1. Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 931–942.Google Scholar
Brock-Utne, Birgit, and Hall B. Holmarsdottir. 2001. “The Choice of English as a Medium of Instruction and its Effects on the African Languages in Namibia”. International Review of Education 471: 293–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Johanna C. 2009. Segments, Tones and Distribution in Khoekhoe Prosody. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah, and Alexander Kautzsch. 2014. “English in Namibia. A First Approach”. English World-Wide 351: 121–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobell, Lauren. 1998. SWAPO’s Struggle for Namibia, 1960–1991: War by Other Means. Basel: Schlettwein.Google Scholar
Dubow, Saul. 2014. A History of Apartheid. 1948–1994. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finn, Peter. 2004. “Cape Flats English: Phonology”. In Edgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume I1. Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 964–984.Google Scholar
Fivaz, Derek, and Sakaria Shikomba. 2003. A Reference Grammar of Oshindonga. Windhoek: Out of Africa Publishers.Google Scholar
Fourie, D. J. 1991. “Language Conflict in Owamboland”. South African Journal of Linguistics 91: 69–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fredericks, Niklaas J. 2013. A Study of Dialectal and Inter-Linguistic Variations of Khoekhoegowab: Towards the Determination of Khoekhoegowab Orthography. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1979. “Ethnicity Markers in Speech”. In Klaus R. Scherer, and Howard Giles, eds. Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–290.Google Scholar
Giliomee, Hermann, and Lawrence Schlemmer. 1993. From Apartheid to Nation-Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harlech-Jones, Brian. 1990. ‘You Taught me Language’. The Implementation of English as a Medium of Instruction in Namibia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Some Prevalent Assumptions in Language Policy, with Contextualisations from Namibia”. In Richard Trewby, and Sandra Fitchat, eds. Language and Development in Southern Africa. Making the Right Choices. Cape Town: Gamsberg McMillan, 25–37.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2011. “The Black Kenyan English Vowel System. An Acoustic Phonetic Analysis”. English World-Wide: 321: 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Richard. 1997. Rethinking Ethnicity. Arguments and Exploration. 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj. 2005. Asian Englishes. Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike. 2011. “Introduction”. In Friederike Kern, and Margret Selting, eds. Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kioko, Angela N., and Margaret J. Muthwii. 2003. “English Variety for the Public Domain in Kenya. Speakers’ Attitudes and Views”. Language, Culture and Curriculum 161: 130–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinz, Norbert. 1984. Deutsche Sprache im Kontakt in Südwest-Afrika: Der heutige Gebrauch der Sprachen Deutsch, Afrikaans und Englisch in Namibia. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Internal Factors. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Social Factors. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lanham, Len W., and C. A. Macdonald. 1979. The Standard in South African English and its Social History. Heidelberg: Groos. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2007. “Mergers and Acquisitions: On the Ages and Origins of Singapore English Particles”. World Englishes 261: 446–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maho, Jounie F. 1998. Few People, Many Tongues. The Languages of Namibia. Windhoek: Gamsberg McMillan.Google Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane. 2012. Interactions across Englishes. Linguistic Choices in Local and International Contact Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2006. “Contact Linguistics and World Englishes”. In Braj Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, and Cecil Nelson, eds. The Handbook of World Englishes. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 273–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Socio-Phonetics and Social Change: Deracialisation of the GOOSE Vowel in South African English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 141: 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The Sociophonetic Effects of ‘Event X’: Post-Apartheid Black South African English in Multicultural Contact with Other South African Englishes”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 58–69.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Class, Gender, and Substrate Erasure in Sociolinguistic Change: A Sociophonetic Study of Schwa in Deracializing South African English”. Language 931: 314–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G., Lutz Marten, and Jekura U. Kavari. 2002. A Grammatical Sketch of Herero (Otjiherero). Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual Speech. A Typology of Language Mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Language Contact Outcomes as the Result of Bilingual Optimization Strategies”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 161: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Namibia Statistics Agency. 2003. “Namibia 2001”. Population and Housing Census. Windhoek: National Planning Commission.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Namibia 2011”. Population and Housing Census Main Report. Windhoek: Namibia Statistics Agency.Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pendleton, Wade. 1993. Katutura: A Place Where we Stay. Life in a Post-Apartheid Township in Namibia. Katutura Before and Now. Windhoek: Gamsberg McMillan.Google Scholar
Peyroux, Elisabeth. 2004. Windhoek, capitale de la Namibie. Changement politique et recomposition des périphéries. Johannesburg: IFAS.Google Scholar
Ponelis, Fritz. 1993. The Development of Afrikaans. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Prinsloo, K. P., D. J. Stoker, A. M. Lubbe, A. E. Strydom, H. A. Engelbrecht, and D. P. van Vuuren. 1982. Aspekte van taal- en kommunikasie-aangeleenthede in SWA/Namibië. Vols. 1–131. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2014. Crossing. Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R., and Penelope Eckert. 2001. “Introduction”. In Penelope Eckert, and John Rickford, eds. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Schmid, Sabine. 2002. Affirmative Action as a Tool for Transformation. The Case of South Africa and Namibia. Saarbrücken: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik.Google Scholar
Schmied, Josef J. 1991. “National and Subnational Features in Kenyan English”. In Jenny Cheshire, ed. English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 420–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stals, Ernst, and Fritz Ponelis. 2001. Só het Afrikaans na Namibië gekom: Afrikaans-Hollands in Namibië vóór die koloniale tyd. Windhoek: Gamsberg McMillan.Google Scholar
Stell, Gerald. 2016. “Current Trends in Linguistic Diversity in Post-Apartheid Windhoek: A Qualitative Appraisal”. Language Matters 471: 326–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R., and Tyler Kendall. 2007. NORM: The Vowel Normalization and Plotting Suite. <[URL]> (accessed March 5, 2019).
Thomason, Sarah. 2001. Language Contact. An Introduction. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, and Jean Hannah. 2013. International English. A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English. 5th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
United Nations Institute for Namibia (UNIN). 1981. Toward a Language Policy for Namibia. English as the Official Language: Perspectives and Strategies. Lusaka: UNIN.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus. 2004. “Black South African English. Phonology”. In Edgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, and Rajend Mesthrie, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume I1. Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus, and Gerhard Van Huyssteen. 2002. “The Vowels of BSAE: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects”. South African Journal of Linguistics 18sup381: 15–33.Google Scholar
Watermeyer, Susan. 1996. “Afrikaans English”. In Vivian De Klerk, ed. Focus on South Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English I. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2008. “The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory”. American Journal of Sociology 1131: 970–1022. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wissing, Daan P. 2002. “Black South African English: A New English? Observations from a Phonetic Viewpoint”. World Englishes 211: 129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. “Akoestiese ontleding van die vokale van bruin en wit jong, vroulike sprekers van Afrikaans”. Litnet Akademies: ’n Joernaal vir die Geesteswetenskappe, Natuurwetenskappe, Regte en Godsdienswetenskappe 101: 304–340.Google Scholar
2014. “Fonetiek”. In Wannie Carstens, and Nerina Bosman, eds. Kontemporêre Afrikaanse Taalkunde. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 91–125.Google Scholar
Yagmur, Kutlay, and Martin Ehala. 2011. “Tradition and Innovation in the Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 321: 101–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Schröder, Anne
2021. Chapter 1. The dynamics of English in Namibia. In The Dynamics of English in Namibia [Varieties of English Around the World, G65], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stell, Gerald
2021. Chapter 2. English in Namibia. In The Dynamics of English in Namibia [Varieties of English Around the World, G65], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Stell, Gerald
2023. Afrikaans English as a Southern Hemisphere English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zähres, Frederic
2021. Chapter 7. Broadcasting your variety. In The Dynamics of English in Namibia [Varieties of English Around the World, G65], ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.