Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 40:3 (2019) ► pp.269–298

Gendered inanimates in Shetland dialect

Comparing pre-oil and contemporary speech

| Justus Liebig University Giessen
The use of gendered pronouns with inanimate noun referents, such as referring to line and pipe as she and to bag or lid as he, has been described as typical for Shetland dialect. In light of recent discussion on the shift from Shetland dialect to Standard English, presumably triggered by the sociodemographic changes brought on by the oil industry, this study investigates the gender system in both the pre-oil and post-oil speech of the variety. Using a database of over 368,000 words of oral history material and a sample of elicited contemporary speech, it is shown that the choice of gender correlates with a number of linguistic and social variables. Furthermore, the study shows that the use of gendered pronouns with inanimate nouns is a robust and stable feature of contemporary Shetland dialect.
Keywords: apparent time study, change, endangered variety, grammatical gender, grammaticality judgements, high contact variety, Scots, Shetland dialect, variation, variety of English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data material
  • 3.Evidence of gendered inanimates in Shetland dialect
  • 4.Gender systems in English and Scots
    • 4.1Defining types of gender systems
    • 4.2Gender systems in English
    • 4.3Gender systems in Scots
  • 5.Investigating the Shetland dialect gender system
    • 5.1Coding the oral history material
    • 5.2Collecting and coding the contemporary material
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1The oral history material
      • 6.1.1Overview of the oral history material
      • 6.1.2Testing for distance
      • 6.1.3Testing the oral history material by noun type
      • 6.1.4Testing for the linguistic parameter of role
    • 6.2The contemporary material
      • 6.2.1Testing for possible indications of a shift to Standard English
      • 6.2.2Testing for social parameters
      • 6.2.3Testing for responses by noun type
      • 6.2.4Participant observation
  • 7.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00032.vel
References (47)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2015. AntConc (Version 3.4.4). Tokyo: Waseda University <[URL]>.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 2000. The Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bugge, Edit. 2010. “The Role of ‘Family’ in Intergenerational Transmission of Shetland Dialect Vocabulary”. In Robert McColl Millar, ed. Northern Lights, Northern Words: Selected Papers from the FRLSU Conference, Kirkwall 2009. Aberdeen: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland, 70–97.Google Scholar
Catford, John. 1957. “Shetland Dialect”. In Thomas A. Robertson, ed. Shetland Folk Book. Vol. 31. Lerwick: Shetland Times, 71–75.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. 2004. “Newfoundland English: Morphology and Syntax”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Edgar W. Schneider, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: De Gryuter, 303–318.Google Scholar
Cohen, Anthony. 1987. Whalsay: Symbol, Segment and Boundary in a Shetland Island Community. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Gender and Noun Classes”. In Timothy Shopen, ed. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2013. “Number of Genders”. In Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, eds. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology <[URL]> (accessed January 3, 2019).
Elworthy, Frederic. 1877. An Outline of the Dialect of West Somerset. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Graham, John. 1993. The Shetland Dictionary (3rd ed.). Lerwick: Shetland Times.Google Scholar
Hernández, Nuria. 2011. “Personal Pronouns”. In Nuria Hernández, Daniela Kolbe, and Monika E. Schulz, eds. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Modals, Pronouns and Complement Clauses. Berlin: De Gryuter, 53–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik, and Achim Zeileis. 2006. “Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework”. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 151: 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “party: A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning”. <[URL]> (accessed May 2, 2018).
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Paul. 1997. “Regional Variation”. In Charles Jones, ed. The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 433–513.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1999. Linguistik: Essentials. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Leisi, Ernst and Christian Mair. 1999. Das heutige Englisch: Wesenszüge und Probleme. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ljosland, Ragnhild. 2012. “‘I’ll Cross dat Brig whin I Come til him’: Grammatical Gender in the Orkney and Shetland Dialects of Scots”. Scottish Language 311: 29–59.Google Scholar
Macafee, Caroline I. 2011. “Characteristics of Non-Standard Grammar in Scotland”. <[URL]> (accessed January 2, 2019).
Mathiot, Madeleine and Marjorie Roberts. 1979. “Sex Roles as Revealed through Referential Gender in American English”. In Madeleine Mathiot, ed. Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited. The Hague: Mouton, 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melchers, Gunnel. 2010. “‘This Unique Dialect’: The Profile of Shetland Dialect in a Typology of World Englishes”. Scottish Language 291: 37–52.Google Scholar
Millar, Robert McColl. 2007. Northern and Insular Scots. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Modern Scots. An Analytical Survey. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Lori. 1991. “Gender in Modern English: The System and its Uses”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 2004. “Australian Vernacular English: Some Grammatical Characteristics”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Edgar W. Schneider, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: De Gryuter, 611–642.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Robertson, Thomas and John Graham. 1991 [1952]. Grammar and Usage of the Shetland Dialect. Lerwick: Shetland Times.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2008. Pronominal Gender in English. A Study of English Varieties from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2009. “Obsolesence vs. Stability in a Shetland Dialect: Evidence from Three Generations of Speakers”. ESRC Full Research Report, RES-000-22-2052. Swindon: ESRC.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Scottish English and Varieties of Scots”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gryuter, 21–29.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Scottish English”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology <[URL]> (accessed January 3, 2019).
Smith, Jennifer and Mercedes Durham. 2011. “A Tipping Point in Dialect Obsolescense?” Journal of Sociolinguistics 151: 197–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strasser, Helmut and Christian Weber. 1999. “On the Asymptotic Theory of Permutation Statistics”. Mathematical Methods of Statistics 81: 220–250.Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley, and Gerhard Tutz. 2009. “An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging and Random Forests”. Psychological Methods 141: 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundkvist, Peter. 2007. “The Pronunciation of Scottish Standard English in Lerwick, Shetland”. English World-Wide 281: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “‘Standard English’ as Spoken in Shetland’s Capital: The Pronunciation of Scottish Standard English in Lerwick”. World Englishes 301: 166–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sally and R. Harald Baayen. 2012. “Models, Forests and Trees of York English: Was/were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice”. Language Variation and Change 241: 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. The Dialects of England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Leyden, Klaske. 2004. Prosodic Characteristics of Orkney and Shetland Dialects: An Experimental Approach. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. fc. A Grammar of Pre-Oil Shetland Dialect. A Typological Description of a High-Contact Variety in Relation to Current Language Use.
. p.c. Consistency of Responses. A Repeated Measures Study of Gendered Inanimates in Shetland Dialect.
Wagner, Susanne. 2003. “Gender in English Pronouns: Myth and Reality”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Gender in English Pronouns: Southwest England”. In Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Herrmann, Lukas Pietsch, and Susanne Wagner, eds. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, Gender, Relative Clauses. Berlin: De Gryuter, 211–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Newfoundland English”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds. The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gryuter, 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar