The way-construction (e.g. He sang his way into our hearts) is a highly
idiomatic English Argument Structure construction. Apart from a brief discussion in Davies and Fuchs (2015: 13), however, no study has looked at the construction in World Englishes. Drawing on more than
14,000 tokens from the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE), we present the first in-depth empirical
analysis of the construction across various types of World Englishes. Our results provide support for Hoffmann’s (2014) claim of the correlation of Dynamic Model stage (Schneider 2003, 2007) and constructional productivity: the overall
frequency of the construction as well as the productivity of the verbal, nominal, and prepositional slots of the construction
correlate positively with a variety’s phase in the Dynamic Model. Moreover, it turns out that the less entrenched a variety is
according to the Dynamic Model, the stronger is its tendency to select specific prototypical, or frequent, fillers in the
constructional slots. Finally, we find no evidence for the reliteralisation hypothesis, i.e. that less advanced varieties exhibit
a preference for concrete verbs or nouns.
Davies, Mark. 2013. “Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries” <[URL]>.
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 2001. Word Frequency Distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Variation: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. “Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity”. In Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, eds. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Vol. 21. Berlin: De Gruyter, 899–919.
Baroni, Marco and Stefan Evert. 2014. “The zipfR Package for Lexical Statistics: A Tutorial Introduction”. October3, 2014 <[URL]> (accessed October 8, 2018).
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Bruckmaier, Elisabeth. 2017. Getting at Get in World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Semasiological-Syntactic Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner, and Victor Kuperman. 2014. “Concreteness Ratings for 40 Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas”. Behavior Research Methods 461: 904–911.
Callies, Marcus. 2011. “Widening the Goalposts of Cognitive Metaphor Research”. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller, and Astrid Lohöfer, eds. Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, Challenges, and Limitations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–81.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. In Michael Kenstowicz, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–52.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, Nick C.2013. “Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition”. In Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365–378.
Evert, Stefan. 2004. “A Simple LNRE Model for Random Character Sequences”. In Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon, and Anne Dister, eds. Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve: UCL, 411–422.
Fanego, Teresa. 2019. “A Construction of Independent Means: The History of the Way Construction Revisited. English Language and Linguistics 231: 671–699.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone”. Language 641: 501–538.
Gelman, Andrew and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.1995. Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.2003. “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language”. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 71: 219–224.
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2004. HCFA 3.2 – A Program for Hierarchical Configural Frequency Analysis <[URL]>.
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2009. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R. New York: Routledge.
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2011. Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2014. “The Cognitive Evolution of Englishes: The Role of Constructions in the Dynamic Model”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 160–180.
Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Israel, Michael. 1996. “The Way Constructions Grow”. In Adele E. Goldberg, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI, 217–230.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1993. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mondorf, Britta. 2010. “Variation and Change in English Resultative Constructions”. Language Variation and Change 221: 397–421.
OED Online. 2019. <[URL]> (accessed October 21, 2019).
Perek, Florent. 2018. “Recent Change in the Productivity and Schematicity of the Way-Construction: A Distributional Semantic Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 141: 65–97.
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plag, Ingo. 2006. “Productivity”. In Bas Aarts, and April M. S. McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Malden: Blackwell, 537–556.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. English Morphology and Word-Formation: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Schneider, Edgar W.2003. “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281.
Schneider, Edgar W.2004. “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes”. World Englishes 231: 227–249.
Schneider, Edgar W.2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skandera, Paul. 2003. Drawing a Map of Africa. Tübingen: Narr.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Thomas Gries. 2005. “Covarying Collexemes”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11: 1–43.
Steger, Maria and Edgar W. Schneider. 2012. “Complexity as a Function of Iconicity: The Case of Complement Clause Constructions in New Englishes”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 156–191.
Szczesniak, Konrad. 2013. “You Can’t Cry your Way to Candy: Motion Events and Paths in the X’s Way Construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 241: 159–194.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeldes, Amir. 2013. “Productive Argument Selection: Is Lexical Semantics Enough?”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 91: 263–291.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Hartmann, Stefan & Alexander Willich
2024. Collostructional Analysis Meets Construction Semantics: Revisiting the English Way-Construction and Its German Equivalents. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 72:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Horsch, Jakob
2023. Corroborating Corpus Data with Elicited Introspection Data: A Case Study. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 74:1 ► pp. 60 ff.
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3 ► pp. 298 ff.
Akinlotan, Mayowa
2020. Relativiser Alternation and Relative Clause Complexity: Insights from Nigerian and American Varieties. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :29/2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Akinlotan, Mayowa
2023. Calling a spade a shovel: A cognitive construction account of BE-relativisation. Studia Neophilologica 95:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Hoffmann, Thomas
2020. Marginal Argument Structure constructions: the [VtheNtaboo-wordout of]-construction in Post-colonial Englishes. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1
Hoffmann, Thomas
2021. The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.