Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 45:2 (2024) ► pp.155–195

Revisiting the aspectual BUSY in (South African) English

| North-West University, South Africa
This paper investigates the so-called South African English busy progressive (for example, I’m busy working). Linguistic literature on South African English (SAfE) often states that this construction is a typical feature of this variety of English. The use and the frequency of this construction is mostly attributed to the influence of the Afrikaans [BUSYPROG XCOMP VINF] construction, as in Ek is besig om te werk (‘I am working’). The aim of this paper is twofold: Firstly, it critically evaluates some of the claims that have been made about the so-called “SAfE busy progressive” and, secondly, it uses a corpus- and usage-based approach that employs a greater assortment of available corpus data from SAfE and other English varieties, as well as available information on the Afrikaans and Dutch progressives, to explore the possibility of new insights into the use of busy in English aspectual constructions.
Keywords: busy , progressive, South African English, Afrikaans, Dutch, aspect, imperfective
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.The [BUSY V -ingPROG] construction
    • 3.1Is [BUSY V‑ingPROG] a typical and prominent lexico-grammatical feature of SAfE?
      • 3.1.1The frequency of [BUSY V‑ingPROG] in SAfE and other English varieties
      • 3.1.2The main verb collocations of [BUSY V‑ingPROG]
    • 3.2Can [BUSY V‑ingPROG] be attributed to language contact with Afrikaans?
    • 3.3Is busy an unnecessary or redundant progressive marker in the SAfE progressive construction?
      • 3.3.1Aktionsart and transitivity
      • 3.3.2Semantic roles of the subject
    • 3.4Is the [BUSY V -ingPROG] construction in South African English similar to the Afrikaans and Dutch [BUSYPROG XCOMP VINF]?
  • 4.[BUSYPROG XCOMP VINF]
    • 4.1[BUSYPROG XCOMP VINF] in corpora of contemporary English
    • 4.2[BUSYPROG XCOMP VINF] in corpora of historical English
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00090.bre
References (52)
Sources
Corpus Hedendaags Nederlands – CHN (Version 3.0) 〈[URL]〉.
Davies, Mark. 2019–. The Coronavirus Corpus 〈[URL]〉.
. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) 〈[URL]〉.
. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) 〈[URL]〉.
. 2013. Corpus of Global Web-Based English 〈[URL]〉.
. 2015. The Wikipedia Corpus 〈[URL]〉.
. 2016–. Corpus of Online Registers of English (CORE) 〈[URL]〉.
. 2017. Early English Books Online Corpus 〈[URL]〉.
Virtuele Instituut vir Afrikaans (VivA). 2022. Korpusportaal: Omvattend 1.11. [Corpus portal: comprehensive 1.11.] 〈[URL]〉.
References
Bach, Emmon. 1986. “The Algebra Of Events”. Linguistics and Philosophy 91: 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bekker, Ian. 2012. “The Story of South African English: A Brief Linguistic Overview”. International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication 11: 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Sean. 2004. “White South African English: Morphology and Syntax”. In Rajend Mesthrie, ed. Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 472–484.Google Scholar
Branford, Jean. 1980. A Dictionary of South African English. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. A Dictionary of South African English. (4th ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breed, Adri, and Gerhard B. van Huyssteen. 2014. “ Aan die en besig in Afrikaanse progressiwiteitskonstruksies [ Aan die and besig in Afrikaans Progressive Constructions]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 541: 708–725.Google Scholar
. 2015. “ Aan die en besig in Afrikaanse progressiwiteitskonstruksies: ’n korpusondersoek [ Aan die and besig in Afrikaans Progressive Constructions: A Corpus Investigation]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 551: 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breed, Adri, Frank Brisard, and Ben Verhoeven. 2017. “Periphrastic Progressive Constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A Contrastive Analysis”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 291: 305–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breed, Adri. 2012. “Die grammatikalisering van aspek in Afrikaans: ’n Semantiese studie van perifrastiese progressiewe konstruksies [The Grammaticalization of Aspect in Afrikaans: A Semantic Study of Periphrastic Progressive Constructions]”. Ph.D. Dissertation, North-West University.
. 2016. “Aspek in Afrikaans: ’n teoretiese beskrywing [Aspect in Afrikaans: A Theoretical Description]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 561: 62–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, and Frank Brisard. 2014. “A Cognitive Grammar Account of the Semantics of the English Present Progressive”. Journal of Linguistics 501: 49–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Adeline Patard, and Frank Brisard. 2013. “A Contrastive Analysis of the Present Progressive in French and English”. Studies in Language 371: 846–879. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré, and Frank Brisard. 2020. “Standing out with the progressive”. Journal of Linguistics 561: 479–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2000. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geleyn, Tim, and Timothy Colleman. 2014. “De progressieve constructies bezig zijn en besig wees: Een contrastief corpusonderzoek Nederlands-Afrikaans [The Progressive Constructions bezig zijn and bezig wees: A Contrastive Corpus Investigation Dutch-Afrikaans]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 541: 56–74.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2022. Coll. Analysis 4.0. A Script for R to Compute Perform Collostructional Analyses. Version 4.0 〈[URL]〉. (accessed June 22, 2023)
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004a. “Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-Based Perspective on ‘Alternations’”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 91: 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan. Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004b. “Covarying Collexemes in the Into-Causative”. In Michel Achard, and Suzanne Kemmer, eds. Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 225–236.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, and Robert Fuchs. 2013. “Progressive Aspect in Nigerian English”. Journal of English Linguistics 411: 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2023. Significance Test System 〈[URL]〉 (accessed June 22, 2023).
Ljung, Magnus. 1980. Reflections on the English Progressive. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothenborgensis.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. “Standards, Codification, and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle”. In Randolph Quirk, and Henry Widdowson, eds. English in the World: Teaching and Learning of Language and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger, and Susan Wright. 1986. “Endogeny vs. Contact: ‘Afrikaans Influence’ on South African English”. English World-Wide 71: 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1995. “South African English”. In Rajend Mesthrie, ed. Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics. Cape Town: David Philip Publishers, 89–106.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1999. “Syntactic Change in Progress: Semi-Auxiliary Busy in South African English”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 61: 63–76.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Endogeny versus Contact Revisited: Aspectual Busy in South African English”. Language Sciences 241: 345–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Middle English Compendium. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed February 1, 2023).
Oxford English Dictionary (OED). Oxford: Oxford University Press 〈[URL]〉 (accessed February 1, 2023).
Piotrowska, Caroline. 2014. “A Diachronic Analysis of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English”. M.A. Thesis, North-West University.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2019. “Regional Varieties of English: Non-Standard Grammatical Features”. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, and Gergana Popova, eds. Oxford Handbook of English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 604–629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 81: 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergej. 2002. “The Parameter of Actionality”. Linguistic Typology 61: 317–401.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus. 2006. “The Extension of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English”. World Englishes 251: 37–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Progressive Aspect and Stative Verbs in Outer Circle Varieties”. World Englishes 331: 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Grammatical Change in South African Englishes”. World Englishes 401: 24–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus, and Haidee Kruger. 2016. “The Innovative Progressive Aspect of Black South African English”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 21: 205–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. “Verbs and Times”. The Philosophical Review 661: 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Christopher. 2002. Non-Progressive and Progressive Aspect in English. Fasano: Schena Editore.Google Scholar