Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 43:3 (2022) ► pp.267–296

He come out and give me a beer but he never seen the bear

Vernacular preterites in Ontario dialects

 | University of Toronto
 | University of Toronto
In this study, we examine variation in English strong verb preterite/participle morphology in four frequent verbs: came/come, saw/seen, gave/give and did/done, using data from more than a dozen Ontario communities, socially stratified by age, sex, occupation and education, representing a continuum of urban/rural locations and spanning more than 100 years in apparent-time. Comparative sociolinguistic methods and statistical modelling permit testing of social, geographic and linguistic factors on the variation. Despite strong social constraints, linguistic constraints are also significant. We argue that standardization and increasing literacy have nearly eradicated the vernacular preterite forms, but they are not moribund yet. Moreover, at least one form is stable, preterite seen. The non-standard variants endure as sociolinguistic markers, perhaps due to locally situated prestige, particularly in non-urban communities.
Keywords: preterite verbs, Ontario English (Canada), vernacular universals, obsolescence, sociolinguistics, language variation, language change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1 Come – came
    • 1.2 Seen – saw
    • 1.3 Give – gave
    • 1.4 Done – did
  • 2.The data and methodology
  • 3.Social factors and distributional analysis
    • 3.1Community
    • 3.2Year of birth
    • 3.3Linguistic factors
  • 4.Statistical modelling
    • 4.1Ontario communities
    • 4.2Ontario generations
    • 4.3Mixed effects model, all verbs
    • 4.4Individual verbs
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 20 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.20014.jan
References (55)
Sources
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2003–2006. Linguistic Changes in Canada Entering the 21st Century. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410-2003-0005. <[URL]>.
2007–2010. “Directions of Change in Canadian English”. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410 070 048.Google Scholar
2010–2013. “Transmission and Diffusion in Canadian English”. Standard Research Grant #410-101-129. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Google Scholar
2013–2018. “Social Determinants of Linguistic Systems”. Insight Grant: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Google Scholar
2019–2024. “Language Change and Social Change in the Early 21st Century: Canadian English 2002 to 2020”. Insight Grant: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).Google Scholar
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2009. The Morphology of English Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby. 1953. A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steven Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4”. Journal of Statistical Software 671: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belleville Oral History Archive. 1975. “Opportunities for Youth 1975”. Hastings County Historical Society. City of Belleville, Ontario. Canada.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, and Dwight Atkinson. 1994. “Archer and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers”. In Udo Fries, Peter Schneider, and Gunnel Tottie, eds. Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the 14th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zurich 1993. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1–13.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald R. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. “Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change”. Language Variation and Change 141: 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 2000. “Universal Sources of the Vernacular”. In Ulrich Ammon, Peter H. Nelde, and Klaus J. Mattheier, eds. Special Issue of Sociolinguistica: International Yearbook of European Sociolinguistics. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 11–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. “Vernacular Universals”. In Josep M. Fontana, Louise McNally, Teresa M. Turell, and Enric Vallduvi, eds. Proceedings of Iclave 1, the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe. Barcelona: Universitate Pompeu Fabra, 52–60.Google Scholar
2004. “Dynamic Typology and Vernacular Universals”. In Bernd Kortmann, ed. Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–145.Google Scholar
2009. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Standardization and the English Irregular Verb”. In Dieter Stein, and Ingrid Tieken-Boon von Ostade, eds. Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 115–133.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Viv Edwards, and Pamela Whittle. 1993. “Non-Standard English and Dialect Levelling”. In James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. New York: Longman, 53–95.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, and James Milroy. 1993. “Syntactic Variation in Non-Standard Dialects: Background Issues”. In James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. New York: Longman, 3–33.Google Scholar
Christian, Donna, Walt Wolfram, and Nanjo Dube. 1988. Variation and Change in Geographically Isolated Communities: Appalachian English and Ozark English. Tuscaloosa: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Franco, Karlien, and Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2021. “Interesting Fellow or Tough Old Bird? 3rd Person Male Referents in Ontario”. American Speech 961: 192–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadanidis, Timothy, Jean-François Juneau, Kinza Mahoon, Andrei Munteanu, Lisa Schlegl, Fiona Wilson, and Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2019. “Sounding Like a Sounder: Dialect Accommodation in Ontario, Canada”. Paper presented at American Dialect Society Annual Meeting. New York, USA. January 3–6, 2019.
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik, Achim Zeileis. 2006. “Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework”. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 151: 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget L., and Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2017. “A Lost Canadian Dialect: The Ottawa Valley 1975–2013”. In Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin, and Anita Auer, eds. Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 239–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget L. and Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2021. “Urban-Rural Dimensions to Variable -Body/-One: The Case of Ontario, Canada.” In Ziegler, Arne, Stefanie Edler, Nina Kleczkowski and Georg Oberdorfer (eds.), Urban Matters. Current Approaches of International Sociolinguistic Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 141-158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto H. 1954. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI1: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar Schneider, and Clive Upton. 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Vol. 21: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Marcin. 1994. The Disintegration of the English Strong Verb System. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1970. “The Study of Language in Its Social Context”. Studium Generale 231: 30–87.Google Scholar
. 1972. “The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax”. In William Labov, ed. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 354–396.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 21: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Transmission and Diffusion”. Language 831: 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience”. In June Helm, ed. Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.Google Scholar
Long, Mary McDonald. 1944. The English Strong Verb from Chaucer to Caxton. Menasha: George Banta Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Needle, Jeremy M. and Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2022. “Orderly Obsolescence: The Decline of /hw/ in Ontario”. American Speech. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padolsky, Enoch, and Ian Pringle. 1981. A Historical Source Book for the Ottawa Valley. Ottawa: Linguistic Survey of the Ottawa Valley, Carleton University.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, and Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora: Tense and Aspect. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Pringle, Ian, and Enoch Padolsky. 1983. “The Linguistic Survey of the Ottawa Valley”. American Specch 581: 325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing <[URL]>.
Rissanen, Matti, and Minna Palander-Collin. 1993. Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2000. “Synchrony and Diachrony in the Evolution of English: Evidence from Scotland”. D.Phil. dissertation, University of York.
. 2004. “Accounting for Vernacular Features in a Scottish Dialect: Relic, Innovation, Analogy and Drift”. In Christian Kay, Simon Horobin, and Jeremy Smith, eds. New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taeldeman, Johan. 2005. “The Influence of Urban Centres on the Spatial Diffusion of Dialect Phenomena”. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, eds. Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2001. “ Come/Came Variation in English Dialects”. American Speech 761: 42–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Harald R. Baayen. 2012. “Models, Forests and Trees of York English: Was/Were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice”. Language Variation and Change 241: 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tidholm, Hans. 1979. The Dialect of Egton in North Yorkshire. Gothenburg: Bokmaskine.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter J. 1972. “Sex, Covert Prestige, and Linguistic Change in Urban British English”. Language in Society 11: 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. <[URL]>. DOI logo
Wolfram, Walt, and Natalie Schilling-Estes. 1998. American English. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Duncan, Daniel
2024. Does ChatGPT have sociolinguistic competence?. Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research 8 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Serbicki, Sofia, Ruijin Lan & Daniel Duncan
2024. Participle-for-preterite variation in Tyneside English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 45:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.