Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 44:2 (2023) ► pp.251–275

Teachers’ attitudes towards varieties of Hong Kong English

Implications for English language teaching

| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Previous language attitude research in Hong Kong compared Hong Kong English (HKE) to exonormative standard Englishes, whereas this study uses five varieties of HKE with more or less localised features. One hundred English language teachers were listener judges in a verbal-guise experiment, and the results showed that most of the speakers received positive evaluations, particularly on solidarity dimensions. The speaker with most local features received the most negative evaluation, but the difference was most evident on status dimensions. Thus, speakers of HKE are seen as likeable, competent and proficient, which suggests that Hong Kong may have entered into the nativisation stage of Kachru’s (1983) model. We argue that the recognition of HKE demonstrated in this study should have implications for English language teaching. We propose adopting pedagogies grounded in local language and culture, which would encourage students and teachers to express themselves in localised English, and express a local identity.
Keywords: Hong Kong English, language attitudes, verbal-guise, nativisation, English language teaching
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hong Kong English
  • 3.Language attitude research in Hong Kong
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Procedure
    • 4.2Speakers
    • 4.3Participants
    • 4.4The questionnaire
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Overall findings
    • 5.2Status and solidarity
    • 5.3Accent recognition
    • 5.4Language attitudes and gender
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.21060.lad
References (53)
References
Bacon-Shone, John, Kingsley Bolton, and Kang-kwong Luke. 2015. Language Use, Proficiency and Attitudes in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley, and Helen Kwok. 1990. “The Dynamics of the Hong Kong Accent: Social Identity and Sociolinguistic Description”. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 11: 7–45.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, Francesco, Bee Chin Ng, and Mark F. Seilhamer. 2014. “Singapore Colloquial English: Issues of Prestige and Identity”. World Englishes 331: 378–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Jim Y. H. 2013. “Contextual Variation and Hong Kong English”. World Englishes 321: 54–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “A Multi-Perspective Investigation of Attitudes towards English Accents in Hong Kong: Implications for Pronunciation Teaching”. TESOL Quarterly 501: 285–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Gender and Attitudes towards English Varieties: Implications for Teaching English as a Global Language.” System 761: 62–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Ka Long Roy. 2017. “Attitudes towards Hong Kong English: Native English Teachers and Local English Teachers”. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 261: 85–110.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Trilingual Codeswitching in Hong Kong”. Applied Linguistics Research Journal 31: 1–14.Google Scholar
. 2020. “The Future of Hong Kong English: Codification and Standardisation.” In Wei Tang, ed. Hong Kong: Past, Present and Future. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 69–88.Google Scholar
Chan, Ka Long Roy, and Lydia N. C. Chan. 2021. “Segmental Features of Hong Kong English: A Contrastive Analysis”. Journal of Universal Language 221: 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Ka Long Roy, and Hans J. Ladegaard. fc.. What do People Notice in Accent Evaluation Studies? The Importance of Prosody.
Cheng, Winnie, and Martin Warren. 2005. “// CAN I Help You//: The Use of Rise and Rise-Fall Tones in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 101: 5–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deterding, David, Jennie Wong, and Andy Kirkpatrick. 2008. “The Pronunciation of Hong Kong English”. English World-Wide 291: 148–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltan, and Tatsuya Taguchi. 2010. Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 2010. Language Diversity in the Classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Forde, Kevin. 1995. “A Study of Learner Attitudes towards Accents of English”. Hong Kong Polytechnic University Working Papers in ELT and Applied Linguistics 11: 59–76.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groves, Julia. 2011. “‘Linguistic Schizophrenia’ in Hong Kong”. English Today 271: 33–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1968. “The Users and Uses of Language”. In Joshua Fishman, ed. Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton 139–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen Edwards, Jette G. 2016. “The Politics of Language and Identity: Attitudes towards Hong Kong English pre and post the Umbrella Movement”. Asian Englishes 181: 157–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “TH Variation in Hong Kong English.” English Language and Linguistics 231: 439–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. The Politics of English in Hong Kong: Attitudes, Identity and Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2021. “‘I have to Save this Language, it’s on the Edge like an Endangered Animal’: Perceptions of Language Threat and Linguistic Mainlandisation in Hong Kong”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 401: 307–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Lena Zipp, and André Huber. 2015. “Attitudes in Fiji towards Varieties of English”. World Englishes 341: 688–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hung, Tony T. N. 2000. “Towards a Phonology of Hong Kong English”. World Englishes 191: 337–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “Hong Kong English”. In Ee-Ling Low, and Azirah Hashim, eds. English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2004. Language and Identity. National, Ethnic, Religious. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1983. “Models for Non-Native Englishes”. In Kingsley Bolton, and Braj B. Kachru, eds. World Englishes: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. London: Routledge, 108–130.Google Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans J. 2000. “Language Attitudes and Sociolinguistic Behaviour: Exploring Attitude-Behaviour Relationships in Language”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 41: 214–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. “Popular Perceptions of Standard Language: Attitudes to ‘Regional Standards’ in Denmark”. Language Awareness 101: 25–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Mee Ling. 2011. “Cultural Identity and Language Attitudes into the Second Decade of Postcolonial Hong Kong.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 321: 249–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Tony. 2017. “Intonational Variation in Hong Kong English: A Pilot Study”. Asian Englishes 191: 22–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E. 1967. “The Social Psychology of Bilingualism”. Journal of Social Issues 231: 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, David C. S. 2009. “Researching Non-Native Speakers’ Views toward Intelligibility and Identity.” In Farzad Sharifian, ed. English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 81–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li Wei, Alfred Tsang, Nick Wong, and Pedro Lok. 2020. “ Kongish Daily: Researching Translanguaging Creativity and Subversiveness”. International Journal of Multilingualism 171: 309–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, Ee-Ling. 2010. “Sounding Local and Going Global: Current Research and Implications for Pronunciation Teaching”. In Lisa Lim, Anne Pakir, and Lionel Wee, eds. English in Singapore: Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luk, Jasmine C. M. 1998. “Hong Kong Students’ Awareness of and Reactions to Accent Difference”. Multilingua 171: 93–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luke, Kang-kwong, and Jack C. Richards. 1982. “English in Hong Kong: Functions and Status”. English World-Wide 31: 47–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Robert M. 2008. “Social Factors and Non-Native Attitudes towards Varieties of Spoken English: A Japanese Case Study”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 181: 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Jamie, and Hans J. Ladegaard. 2017. “Evidentiality and Identity Positioning in Online Disputes about Language use in Hong Kong”. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 171: 53–74.Google Scholar
Munro, Murray J. 2011. “Intelligibility: Buzzword or Buzzworthy?” In John Levis, and Kimberly LeVelle, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames: Iowa State University, 7–16.Google Scholar
Nelson, Cecil L. 2011. Intelligibility in World Englishes: Theory and Application. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sasayama, Shoko. 2013. “Japanese College Students’ Attitudes towards Japan English and American English”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 341: 264–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setter, Jane, Cathy S. P. Wong, and Brian H. S. Chan. 2010. Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sewell, Andrew J. 2012. “The Hong Kong English Accent: Variation and Acceptability.” Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 131: 1–21.Google Scholar
2016. English Pronunciation Models in a Globalized World. Accent, Acceptability and Hong Kong English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sewell, Andrew J., and Jason Chan. 2010. “Patterns of Variation in the Consonantal Phonology of Hong Kong English.” English World-Wide 311: 13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1975. Accent, Dialect and the School. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy B. M., and David Bunton. 2000. “The Discourse and Attitudes of English Teachers in Hong Kong”. World Englishes 191: 287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, Paul. 2015. Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qi. 2014. Investigating Hong Kong English. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Zahn, Christopher J., and Robert Hopper. 1985. “Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 41: 113–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ladegaard, Hans J. & Ka Long Roy Chan
2024. The importance of suprasegmental features in language attitude research: evidence from a study of teachers’ attitudes towards Hong Kong English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Hans J. Ladegaard
2024. Editorial. Language and Intercultural Communication 24:2 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Lehnen, Lisa
2023. Review of Bolton, Botha & Kirkpatrick (2020): The Handbook of Asian Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:2 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.