This paper presents the Twitter Corpus of Philippine Englishes (TCOPE): a dataset of 27 million tweets amounting
to 135 million words collected from 29 cities across the Philippines. It provides an overview of the dataset, and then shows how
it can be employed to examine Philippine English (PhilE) and its relationship with extralinguistic factors (e.g. ethno-geographic
region, time, sex). The focus is on the patterns of variation involving four PhilE features: (1) irregular past tense morpheme
-t, (2) double comparatives, (3) subjunctive were, and (4) phrasal verb base
from. My analyses corroborate previous work and further demonstrate structured heterogeneity within PhilE, indicating
that it is a multifaceted and dynamic variety. TCOPE has shown itself to be useful for exploring both the “general” features of
contemporary PhilE and the different forms of variation within it. It contributes to a deeper understanding of Philippine
English(es) over time and in different social contexts.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong. 2021. TweetCorp. 〈[URL]〉
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2022. AntConc. Version
4.0.5. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed May 21, 2022).
Araneta, Anica, Bruno Carrasco, Hanif Rahemtulla, Stella Balgos, and Stephanie Sy. 2021. “Mapping
Digital Poverty in PH”. Inquirer February 22, 2021. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed February 22, 2022).
Ardehaly, Ehsan Mohammady, and Aron Culotta. 2017. “Co-training
for Demographic Classification Using Deep Learning from Label Proportions”. Paper presented at
the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), The Roosevelt New Orleans
Waldorf Astoria Hotel.
Bamman, David, Jacob Eisenstein, and Tyler Schnoebelen. 2014. “Gender
Identity and Lexical Variation in Social Media”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 181: 135–160.
Bautista, Ma. Lourdes S.2000. Defining Standard Philippine English:
Its Status and Grammatical Features. Manila: De La Salle University Press.
Bautista, Ma. Lourdes S.2004a. “An Overview of the Philippine
Component of the International Corpus of English (ICE-PHI)”. Asian
Englishes 71: 8–26.
Bautista, Ma. Lourdes S.2004b. “Researching English in the
Philippines: Bibliographical Resources”. World
Englishes 231: 199–210.
Bohmann, Axel. 2016. “Language
Change Because Twitter? Factors Motivating Innovative Uses of Because Across the English-Speaking
Twittersphere”. In Lauren Squires, ed. English
in Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter, 149–178.
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga. 2011. “Some Aspects of the
Morphosyntax of Philippine English”. In Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista, ed. Studies
of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine component of the International Corpus of
English. Manila: Anvil Publishing, 187–200.
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga. 2016. “Relocating Philippine
English in Schneider’s Dynamic Model”. Asian
Englishes 181: 232–241.
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga, and Shirley N. Dita. 2015. “Taking
a look at Expanded Predicates in Philippine English Across Time”. Asian
Englishes 171: 240–247.
Collins, Peter, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, Joo-Hyuk Lim, and Xinyue Yao. 2014. “The
Subjunctive Mood in Philippine English: A Diachronic
Analysis”. In Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt, and Daniel Schreier, eds. Studies
in Language Companion Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 259–280.
Collins, Peter, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, and Xinyue Yao. 2014. “Modality
in Philippine English: A Diachronic Study”. Journal of English
Linguistics 421: 68–88.
Coupland, Nikolas. 2016. “Labov,
Vernacularity and Sociolinguistic Change”. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 201: 409–430.
Doyle, Gabriel. 2014. “Mapping
Dialectal Variation by Querying Social Media”. In Shuly Wintner, Sharon Goldwater, and Stefan Riezler, eds. Proceedings
of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational
Linguistics. Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, 98–106.
Eisenstein, Jacob, Brendan O’Connor, Noah Smith, and Eric Xing. 2010. “A
Latent Variable Model for Geographic Lexical Variation”. In Hang Li, and Lluís Màrquez, eds. Proceedings
of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1277–1287.
Evans, Stephen. 2015. “Testing
the Dynamic Model: The Evolution of the Hong Kong English Lexicon (1858–2012)”. Journal of
English Linguistics 431: 175–200.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong. 2017. “Philippine
Englishes”. Asian
Englishes 191: 79–95.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong. 2022a. “Hybridization”. In Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, ed. Philippine
English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the
Philippines. London: Routledge, 170–183.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong. 2022b. “Interactions of Sinitic
Languages in the Philippines: Sinicization, Filipinization, and Sino-Philippine Language
Creation”. In Zhengdao Ye, ed. The
Palgrave Handbook of Chinese Language
Studies. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 369–408.
Gonzalez, Andrew. 2004. “The
Social Dimensions of Philippine English”. World
Englishes 231: 7–16.
Gustilo, Leah, and Chenee M. Dino. 2017. “Old
Speak or Young Speak: An Analysis of Netspeak Features in Filipino Netspeak”. Advanced Science
Letters 231: 1099–1103.
Gustilo, Leah, Abdul Wahid Ibrahim Tocalo, and King Arman Calingasan. 2019. “The
Intelligibility and Acceptability of Internet Philippine English (IPE): Their Implications for English Language Teaching in
the New English Varieties”. Asian EFL
Journal 211: 83–104.
Honnibal, Matthew, Ines Montani, Sofie Van Landeghem, and Adriane Boyd. 2020. spaCy:
Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing in Python. Version 3.5.1. 〈 〉 (accessed May 1, 2022).
Hundt, Marianne. 2021. “On
Models and Modelling”. World
Englishes 401: 298–317.
Imao, Yasu. 2022. CasualConc. Version
2.1.7. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed May 1, 2022).
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Global
Englishes: A Resource Book for Students (3rd
ed.). London: Routledge.
Kachru, Braj B.1990. “World Englishes and Applied
Linguistics”. World
Englishes 91: 3–20.
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic
Patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lee, Aldrin P., and Ariane Macalinga Borlongan. 2022. “Internal
Variation”. In Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, ed. Philippine
English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the Philippines (1st
ed.). London: Routledge, 125–134.
Llamzon, Teodoro. 1969. Standard
Filipino English. Manila: Ateneo University Press.
Maclagan, Margaret, Elizabeth Gordon, and Gillian Lewis. 1999. “Women
and Sound Change: Conservative and Innovative Behavior by the Same Speakers”. Language
Variation and Change 111: 19–41.
Pietikäinen, Sari, Alexandra Jaffe, Helen Kelly-Holmes, and Nikolas Coupland. 2016. Sociolinguistics
from the Periphery: Small Languages in New Circumstances (1st
ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and
environment for statistical computing. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed May
1, 2022).
Rocklin, Matthew. 2015. “Dask:
Parallel Computation with Blocked Algorithms and Task
Scheduling”. In Kathryn Huff, and James Bergstra, eds. Proceedings
of the 14th Python in Science
Conference. Austin: SciPy, 130–136.
Rudis, Bob. 2020. Package
“Pluralize”: Pluralize and “Singularize” Any (English) Word. R package version
0.2.0. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed May 1, 2022).
Samejon, Kevin. 2022. “Acoustic
and Social Dimensions of Word-Final /z/ Production: Data from Acrolectal Speakers of Philippine
English”. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on
English Pronunciation: Issues & Practices (EPIP7), Université Grenoble-Alpes.
Sankoff, Gillian. 2006. “Age:
Apparent Time and Real Time”. In Keith Brown, ed. The
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd
ed.). Oxford: Elsevier, 110–116.
Schneider, Edgar. 2003. “The
Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect
Birth”. Language 791: 233–281.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Derek Denis. 2008. “Linguistic
Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language”. American
Speech 831: 3–34.
Tayao, Ma. Lourdes G.2004. “The Evolving Study of
Philippine English Phonology”. World
Englishes 231: 77–90.
Van Rossum, Guido, and Fred L. Drake. 2009. Python
3 Reference Manual. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace.
Villanueva, Rey John Castro. 2016. “The Features of Philippine
English Across Regions”. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University.
Wang, Zijian, Scott A. Hale, David Adelani, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz, Timo Hartmann, Fabian Flöck, and David Jurgens. 2019. “Demographic
Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media
Data”. In Ling Liu, and Ryen White, eds. Proceedings
of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2056–2067.
Wijffels, Jan. 2022. Package
“UDPipe”: Tokenization, Parts of Speech Tagging, Lemmatization and Dependency Parsing with the “UDPipe” “NLP”
Toolkit. R package version 0.8.11. 〈[URL]〉 (accessed May 1, 2022).
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Bolton, Kingsley, Priscilla T. Cruz & Isabel Pefianco Martin
2024. Research bibliography for Philippine English (2008–2023). World Englishes
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2023. From tweets to trends: analyzing sociolinguistic variation and change using the Twitter Corpus of English in Hong Kong (TCOEHK). Asian Englishes► pp. 1 ff.
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2024. Philippine Englishes in the Sino‐Philippine Lannang context: Towards a concentric‐pluricentric interactional‐interplanar model of English. World Englishes
GONZALES, WILKINSON DANIEL WONG
2024. When to (not) split the infinitive: factors governing patterns of syntactic variation in Twitter-style Philippine English. English Language and Linguistics► pp. 1 ff.
2024. Sociolinguistic Analysis with Missing Metadata? Leveraging Linguistic and Semiotic Resources Through Deep Learning to Investigate English Variation and Change on Twitter. Applied Linguistics
Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
2024. The Holistic Advantage: Unified Quantitative Modeling for Less-Biased, In-Depth Insights into (Socio)Linguistic Variation. Languages 9:5 ► pp. 182 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.