Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 38:2 (2017) ► pp.211–237

Transparency and language contact in the nativization of relative clauses in New Englishes

 | University of the Balearic Islands
The present paper explores structural nativization in relative clauses in three varieties of English (India, Hong Kong, and Singapore Englishes). All three of these emerged as the consequence of British colonization, developed as varieties through educational systems, and are now consolidating as independent, linguistically different (local) prestige varieties. An analysis of comparable samples from the spoken component of the International Corpus of English (ICE) is carried out; in addition to the varieties mentioned above, data from ICE-GB are included for comparison. The analysis shows that certain features and structures predominate in specific varieties, and also illustrates constructions which are specific to the Asian varieties under investigation. These nativized relative clauses can be explained as cross-linguistic tendencies that go beyond the influence of the local language(s), and hence they are further analyzed in light of cognitive determinants of learning, which favor isomorphism and aim at maximizing transparency.
Keywords: transparency, language contact, isomorphism, structural nativization, relative clauses, New Englishes
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Nativization of New Englishes
    • 2.1Cognitive constraints of second-language learning
    • 2.2Language contact
  • 3.Relative clauses in New Englishes
  • 4.Corpus and methodology
    • 4.1Results and discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Sources
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.38.2.05sua
References (85)
References
Alsagoff, Lubna, and Ho Chee Lick. 1998. “The Relative Clause in Colloquial Singapore English”. World Englishes 171: 127–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Ronald E., and T. C. Kumari. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, Ayo. 1998. “Torn between the Norms: Innovations in World Englishes”. World Englishes 171: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2006. “World Englishes Today”. In Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, and Cecil L. Nelson, eds. The Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Blackwell, 240–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. 2007. “Grammatical Variation in England”. In David Britain, ed. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Thomas. 2014. “Structural Nativization, Typology and Complexity: Noun Phrase structures in British, Kenyan and Singaporean English”. English Language and Linguistics 181: 23–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, David Adger, and Sue Fox. 2013. “Relative Who and the Actuation Problem”. Lingua 1261: 51–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, and Tania Kuteva. 2013. “Relativization on Subjects”. In Matthew Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, eds. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (accessed December 15, 2015).
Denison, David, and Marianne Hundt. 2013. “Defining Relatives”. Journal of English Linguistics 411: 135–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2009. “On the Role of Frequency and Similarity in the Acquisition of Subject and Non-subject Relative Clauses”. In Talmy Givón, and Masayoshi Shibatani, eds. Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 251–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. “Order of Relative Clause and Noun”. In Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, eds. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (accessed December 15, 2015)
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2014. “Functional Syntax in Historical Perspective”. In Claire Bowern, and Beth Evans, eds. Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. London: Routledge, 308–325.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2015. “At the Interface of Contact Linguistics and Second Language Research”. English World-Wide 361: 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2000. “Relative Clauses in Hong Kong English”. World Englishes 191: 357–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. “Introducing ICE”. In Sidney Greenbaum, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3–12.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike. 2011. “Studying Structural Innovations in New English Varieties”. In Joybrato Mukherjee, and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 101–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, and Lilian Coronel. 2012. “Relatives Worldwide”. In Marianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity Worldwide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R., and Robert Bayley. 1995. “On the Choice of Relative Pronouns in English”. American Speech 701: 148–172 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie. 2012. The Emergence of the English Native Speaker. A Chapter in Nineteenth-Century Linguistic Thought. Berlin: De Grutyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2003. “Why are Zero-marked Phrases Close to their Heads?” In Gunther Rohdenburg, and Britta Mondorf, eds. Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 175–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Tanja. 2003. “Relative Clauses in Dialects of English: A Typological Approach”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, and Axel Bohmann. 2015. “ Which-hunting and the Standard English Relative Clause”. Language 911: 806–836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus. 2012. “Syntactic and Variational Complexity in British and Ghanaian English Relative Clause Formation in the Written Parts of the International Corpus of English”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 218–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2016. “Error, Feature, (Incipient) Change – or Something else altogether?” In Elena Seoane, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez, eds. World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–60.Google Scholar
. 2015. “World Englishes”. In Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 381–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, David Denison, and Gerold Schneider. 2012. “Retrieving Relatives from Historical Data”. Language and Linguistic Computing 271: 3–16.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 1984. “The Use of Typological Markedness Conditions as Predictors in Second Language Acquisition”. In Roger A. Andersen, ed. Second Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, 39–58.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt. 1994. “Nonrestrictive That-clauses Revisited”. Studia Neophilologica 661: 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kandiah, Thiru. 1998. “The Emergence of New Englishes”. In Joseph A. Foley, Thiru Kandiah, Bao Zhiming, Anthea F. Gupta, Lubna Algasoff, Ho Chee Lick, Lionel Wee, I. S. Talib, and Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, eds. English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 73–105.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. “Relative clauses”. In Timothy Shopen, ed. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. II: Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–170.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L., and Bernd Comrie. 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63–99.Google Scholar
Killingley, Siew-Yue. 1993. Cantonese. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2009. “World Englishes between Simplification and Complexification”. In Thomas Hoffmann, Lucia Siebers, and Egar W. Schneider, eds. World Englishes: Problems, Properties and Prospects. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 265–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds. 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English [eWAVE]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <Available at [URL]> (accessed December 15, 2015).
Kretzschmar, William A. 2014. “Emergence of ‘New Varieties’ in Speech as a Complex System”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 142–159.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2012. The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre. 2015. “Transparency in Language. A Typological Study”. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utrecht: LOT. <Available at [URL]> (accessed January 15, 2016).
Mair, Christian. 2003. “Kreolismen und verbales Identitätsmanagement in geschriebenen jamaikanischen Englisch. In Elisabeth Vogel, Antonia Napp, and Wolfram Lutterer, eds. Zwischen Ausgrenzung und Hybridisierung. Würzburg: Ergon, 79–96.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 2004. “Remarks on Adsentential Adnominal and Extraposed Relative Clauses in Hindi”. In Veneeta Dayal, and Anoop Mahajan, eds. Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 291–311, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 2011. “Bilingual Acquisition and Theories of Diachronic Change: Bilingualism as Cause and Effect of Grammatical Change”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 141: 121–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M., Martin Elsig, and Esther Rinke. 2013. Language Acquisition and Change. A Morphosyntactic Perspesctive. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2010. “New Englishes and the Native Speaker Debate”. Language Sciences 321: 594–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, and Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2006. “Spoken and Written English”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 603–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2014. “Language Ecology, Language Evolution, and the Actuation Question”. In Tor Afarli, and Brit Maelhum, eds. Language Contact and Change: Grammatical Structure Encounters the Fluidity of Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 13–35.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. “Describing Verb-complementational Profiles of New Englishes: a Pilot Study of Indian English”. English World-Wide 271: 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Gries. 2009. “Verb-construction Associations in the International Corpus of English”. English World-Wide 301: 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marco Schilk. 2012. “Exploring Variation and Change in New Englishes: Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond”. In Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–199.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1997. “On the Functions of left-dislocation in English Discourse”. In Akio Kamio, ed. Directions in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 117–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. “Syntax”. In Roger Lass, ed. The Cambride History of the English Language, Vol 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–331.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. “Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English”. Cognitive Linguistics 71: 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaub, Steffen. 2016. “The Influence of Register on Noun Phrase Complexity on Varieties of English”. In Christof Schubert, and Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, eds. Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 251–270.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2004. “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes”. World Englishes 231: 227–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “Exploring the Interface between World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition – and Implications for English as a Lingua Franca”. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 11: 57–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez. 2013. “The Expression of the Perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes”. English World-Wide 341: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena, Lucía Loureiro-Porto, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez. 2016. “The ICE project looks at Iberia: The International Corpus of Gibraltar English”. Paper presented at 40th AEDEAN International Conference. University of Zaragoza at Huesca, 9–12 November 2016.
Sigley, Robert. 1997. “The Influence of Formality and Channel on Relative Pronoun Choice in New Zealand English”. English Language and Linguistics 11: 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1983. “What the Natives Have in Mind”. In Roger A. Andersen, ed. Pidginization and Creolization as Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, 246–253Google Scholar
Srivastav, Venetta. 1991. “The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 91: 637–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steger, Maria, and Edgar W. Schneider. 2012. “Complexity as a Function of Iconicity. The Case of Complement Clause Constructions in New Englishes”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benkedict Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity. Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 156–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2014. “Relative Clauses in Asian Englishes.” Journal of English Linguistics 421: 245–268, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “The Places where English is Spoken: Adverbial Relative Clauses in World Englishes”. World Englishes 341: 620–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2002. “Variation and Change in the British Relative Marker System”. In Patricia Poussa, ed. Dialect contact on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa, 147–165.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language Contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., and Terrence Kaufmann. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 1997. “Overseas Relatives: British-American Differences in Relative Marker Usage”. In Jan Aarts, Inge de Mönnink, and Herman Wekker, eds. Studies in English Language and Teaching. In honour of Flor Aarts. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 153–165.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel, and Dawn Harvie. 2000. “It’s all Relative: Relativization Strategies in Early African American English”. In Shana Poplack, ed. The English History of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell, 198–230.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel, and Michael Rey. 1997. “Relativization Strategies in Earlier African American Vernacular English”. Language Variation and Change 91: 219–247 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The People’s Linguistic Survey of India. Bhasha Research and Publication Centre. <Available at [URL]> (accessed October 15, 2016).
Trudgill, Peter. 2009. “Sociolinguistic Typology and Complexification”. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, and Peter Trudgill, eds. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98–109.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus. 2011. “A Principled Distinction between Error and Conventionalized Innovation in African Englishes”. In Joybrato Mukherjee, and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner English. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 189–207.Google Scholar
Williams, Jessica. 1987. “Non-native Varieties of English. A Special Case of Language Acquisition”. English World-Wide 81: 161–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiliams, Jessica. 1989. “Pronoun Copies, Pronominal Anaphora and Zero Anaphora in Second Language Production”. In Susan Gass, Carolyn Madden, Dennis Preston, and Larry Selinker, eds. Variation in Second-Language Acquisition. Vol. 1: Discourse and Pragmatics. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters, 153–189.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 2009. “The Interplay of ‘Universals’ and Contact-induced Change in the Emergence of New Englishes”. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Heli Paulasto, eds. Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond. London: Routledge, 206–230.Google Scholar
Windstedt, Richard O. 1913. Malay Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie, Nicholas Lester, and Maria T. Martinez-Garcia. 2014. “ That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English”, Language and Cognition 61: 271–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Virginia, and Stephen Matthews. 1991. “Relative Complexity: Beyond Avoidance”. Chinese University of Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics 31: 112–124.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Suárez‐Gómez, Cristina & Elena Seoane
2023. The role of age and gender in grammatical variation in world Englishes. World Englishes 42:2 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8 ► pp. 1151 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2023. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica 95:1 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.