Cover not available
Part of
Major versus Minor? – Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World
Edited by Theo D’haen, Iannis Goerlandt and Roger D. Sell
[FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures 1] 2015
► pp. 53–66

National Identities and the Latin Language in Hungary and Croatia

Language Conflicts, 1784-1848

Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.1.04sub
References (37)
Axer, Jerzy. 1998. “Latein als Sprache der Adelsnation in der polnisch-litauischen Konföderation (16. bis 18. Jahrhundert): Eine These.” In Latein und Nationalsprachen in der Renaissance, ed. by Bodo Guthmüller, 131–135. Wolfenbütteler Abhandlungen zur Renaissanceforschung 17. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Berzewicy, Gregor von. 1817. “Etwas über Nationen und Sprachen.” Archiv für Geographie, Historie, Staats-und Kriegskunst June 13–16: 287–289.Google Scholar
Bogdanov, Vaso. 1958. Historija političkih stranaka u Hrvatskoj: Od prvih stranačkih grupiranja do 1918. Zagreb: Novinarsko izdavačko poduzeće.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. 2004. Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busan, Hermannus. [ Oratio ]. MS 3736. Nacionalna i sveucilisna knjiznica u Zagrebu, Zagreb.
Casanova de Seingalt, Jacques. 1960. Histoire de ma vie: Édition intégrale: Tome Deux. Wiesbaden: F.A. Brockhaus; Paris: Librairie Plon.Google Scholar
Connor, Walker. 1970. “Ethnic Nationalism as a Political Force.” World Affairs 133: 91–97.Google Scholar
Derkos, Ivan. 1832. Genius patriae super dormientibus suis filiis. Zagreb: Suppan.Google Scholar
Drašković, Janko. 1832. Disertacija iliti razgovor darovan gospodi poklisarom zakonskim i budućem zakonotvorcem kraljevinah naših. Karlovac: Prettner.Google Scholar
Evans, Robert John Weston. 2006. Austria, Hungary, and the Habsburgs: Essays on Central Europe, c. 1683–1867. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Politics of Language and the Languages of Politics: Latin and the Vernaculars in Eighteenth-Century Hungary.” In Cultures of Power in Europe during the Long Eighteenth Century, ed. by Hamish Scott and Brendan Simms, 200–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fancev, Franjo (ed.). 1933. Dokumenti za naše podrijetlo hrvatskoga preporoda (1790–1832). Građa za povijest književnosti Hrvatske 12. Zagreb: NadbiskUpska tiskara.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2002. Werke: Band III: Textband und Kommentarband: Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit, ed. by Wolfgang Proß. Munich: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Horvatović, Domoljub. 1833. Sollen wir Magyaren werden? Fünf Briefe geschrieben aus Pesth an einen Freund an der Theis. Karlstadt: Prettner.Google Scholar
Jurčić, Hrvoje. 1969. “Die sogenannten ‘Pacta conventa’ in kroatischer Sicht.” Ungarn-Jahrbuch 1: 11–22.Google Scholar
Katona, Stephanus. 1810. Historia critica regum Hungariae stirpis Austriacae ex fide domesticorum et externorum scriptorum concinnata. Tomulus XXI, ordine XL. Buda: Regia Universitas Hungarica.Google Scholar
Kukuljević, Ivan. 1997. “Prvi od davnina zastupnički govor na hrvatskom jeziku koji je održao Ivan Kukuljević 2. svibnja 1843. u Hrvatskom saboru.” In Programski spisi hrvatskog narodnog preporoda, ed. by Miroslav Šicel, 157–161. Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.Google Scholar
Maissen, Anna Pia. 1998. Wie ein Blitz schlägt es aus meinem Mund. Der Illyrismus: Die Hauptschriften der kroatischen Nationalbewegung 1830–1844. Geist und Werk der Zeiten 89. Bern, et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. 1987. “Sprachkonflikt: Terminologische und begriffsgeschichtliche Überlegungen.” In Soziokulturelle Perspektiven von Mehrsprachigkeit und Spracherwerb. Sociocultural Perspectives of Multilingualism and Language Acquisition, 289–299. Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 320. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Miskolczy, Ambrus. 2009. “A ‘hungarus alternatíva.’ Példák és ellenpéldák: (Fejes Jánostól Rumy Károly Györgyig).” Regio. Kisebbség, Politika, Társadalom 26 (2): 3–45.Google Scholar
Oakes, Leigh. 2001. Language and National Identity: Comparing France and Sweden. Impact: Studies in Language and Society 13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“Preisausschreibung.” 1808. Morgenblatt für gebildete Stände. April 4: 324.Google Scholar
Rapant, Daniel. 1927. K počiatkom maďarizácie: Diel prvý.:Vývoj rečovej otázky v Uhorsku 1740–1790. Spisy Filozofickej fakulty Univerzity Komenského v Bratislave 8. Bratislava: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Komenského.Google Scholar
Révész, Lászlo. 1968. Die Anfänge des ungarischen Parlamentarismus. Südosteuropäische Arbeiten 68. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel, and Thomas Stolz. 2003. “Introduction.” In Minor Languages: Approaches, Definitions, Controversies, ed. by Joel Sherzer and Thomas Stolz, vii–xii. Diversitas Linguarum 3. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Sikirić Assouline, Zvjezdana. 2006. U obranu hrvatskih municipalnih prava i latinskog jezika. Govori na Hrvatskom Saboru 1832. godine. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Latinitet u hrvatskom drustvu prve polovice 19. stoljeća.” Radovi zavoda za hrvatsku povijest filozofskoga fakulteta sveučilista u Zagrebu 41: 257–265.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 1992. “National Identity and the Idea of European Unity.” International Affairs 68: 55–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2001. “Minor Languages and General Linguistics (with Special Focus on Europe).” In Minor Languages of Europe, ed. by Thomas Stolz, 211–242. Bochum – Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 30. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Sundhaußen, Holm. 1973. Der Einflluß der Herderschen Ideen auf die Nationsbildung bei den Völkern der Habsburger Monarchie. Buchreihe der Südostdeutschen Historischen Kommission 27. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Szekfű, Gyula. 1926. Iratok a magyar államnyelv kérdésének történetéhez, 1790–1848. Budapest: Magyar Történelmi Társulat.Google Scholar
Tkalac, E.I.von. 1894. Jugenderinnerungen aus Kroatien (1749–1823. 1824–1843). Leipzig: Wigand.Google Scholar
Tóth, István György. 2000. Literacy and Written Culture in Early Modern Central Europe. Budapest: CEU.Google Scholar
“Ungarn.” 1784. Wiener Zeitung, June 26: 1458–1460.Google Scholar
V[ojkffy], F[ranciscus]. 1832. Dissertatio de introducenda in regno Hungariae et regnis ac provinciis eidem adnexis in cunctis negotiis publicis lingua hungarica. Zagreb: Suppan.Google Scholar
Waquet, Françoise. 2001. Latin, or the Empire of a Sign: From the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Centuries. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zhu, Hongxiang, Lay Hoon Ang & Nor Shahila Mansor
2024. Are mouse noodles actually made from mice? Touring street food name translations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.