Article published In:
Discourse-pragmatic perspectives on interrogatives
Edited by Malte Rosemeyer
[Functions of Language 29:1] 2022
► pp. 86115
Auer, Peter
2005Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text & Talk 25 (1). 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar
2009Contrasting and turn transition: Prosodic projection with parallel-opposition constructions. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11). 2271–2294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David I., Craige Roberts, Mandy Simons & Judith Tonhauser
2017Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of Linguistics 3 (1). 265–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benz, Anton & Katja Jasinskaja
2017Questions under discussion: From sentence to discourse. Discourse Processes 54 (3). 177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2020Praat (version 6.1.30). Amsterdam: Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam. [URL]
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1977Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky
2016The argument dependency model. In Gregory Hickok & Steven L. Small (eds.), Neurobiology of language, 357–369. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003On D-Trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5). 511–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifton, Charles, Jr. & Lyn Frazier
2018Context effects in discourse: The question under discussion. Discourse Processes 55 (2). 105–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Constant, Noah
2014Contrastive topic: Meanings and realizations. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PhD Thesis.
Elvira-García, Wendy
2017Create pictures with tiers v.4.4. Praat script. [URL]
Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Katariina Harjunpää, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, et al.
2019Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics 55 (2). 277–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, Robert
2007Asking questions: Using meaningful structures to imply ignorance. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Daniel W.
2020We talk to people, not contexts. Philosophical Studies 1771. 2713–2733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy
2006Topic-focus controversies. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus, 373–397. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström & Jakob Steensig
2011Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In Jakob Steensig, Lorenza Mondada & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 107–130. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2012Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
2011Emergent grammar and temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent, 22–44. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jasinskaja, Katja & Henk Zeevat
2008Explaining additive, adversative and contrast marking in Russian and English. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 241. 65–91.Google Scholar
Kamide, Yuki, Gerry T. M. Altmann & Sarah L. Haywood
2003The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (1). 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2012Interrogative intimations: On a possible social economics of interrogatives. In Jan P. De Ruiter (ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives, 11–32. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matić, Dejan
2015Tag questions and focus markers: Evidence from the Tompo dialect of Even. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 167–190. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matić, Dejan & Daniel Wedgwood
2013The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49 (1). 127–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel
2018aA community-driven documentation of natural discourse in Anal, an endangered Tibeto-Burman language. London. [URL]
2018bTracing the sources of Information Structure: Towards the study of interactional management of information.” Journal of Pragmatics 1381. 77–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019This is not an interrogative: The prosody of ‘wh-questions’ in Hebrew and the sources of their questioning and rhetorical interpretations. Language Sciences 721. 13–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021aMultifactorial information management: Summing up the emerging alternative to information structure. Linguistics Vanguard 7 (1). 2020039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021bProsodic salience in Anal Naga: Where non-arbitrariness, phaticity and engagement meet. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1). 41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panov, Vladimir
2020The marking of uncontroversial information in Europe: Presenting the Enimitive. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52 (1). 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riester, Arndt, Lisa Brunetti & Kordula De Kuthy
2018Annotation guidelines for questions under discussion and information structure. In Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Information structure in lesser-described languages, 403–443. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
2012Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5 (6). 1–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas-Esponda, Tania
2014A QUD account of German doch . Proceedings of Sinn Und Bedeutung 181. 359–376.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1978On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), Current trends in text linguistics, 81–102. Berlin: Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsauki
2016Saliency in discourse and sentence form: Zero anaphora and topicalization in Japanese. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 55–75. Berlin: Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2008A response to Abbott on presupposition and common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5). 539–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensing, Jacob & Trine Heinemann
2013When ‘yes’ is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question. In Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Units of talk – units of action, 207–242, Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig
(eds.) 2011The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Federico Rossano
2010Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1). 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko
2015Action-projection in Japanese conversation: Topic particles wa, mo, and tte for triggering categorization activities. Frontiers in Psychology 61. 1113–1135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thounaojam, Harimohon & Shobhana L. Chelliah
2007The Lamkang language: Grammatical sketch, texts and lexicon. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30 (1). 1–212.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2007Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar