Introduction published In:
Continuative and contrastive discourse relations across discourse domains: Cognitive and cross-linguistic approaches
Edited by Matthias Klumm, Anita Fetzer and Evelien Keizer
[Functions of Language 30:1] 2023
► pp. 415
Afantenos, Stergos, Nicholas Asher, Farah Benamara, Myriam Bras, Cécile Fabre, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac, Anne Le Draoulec, Philippe Muller, Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley, Laurent Prévot, Josette Rebeyrolle, Ludovic Tanguy, Marianne Verguez-Couret & Laure Vieu
2012An empirical resource for discovering cognitive principles of discourse organization: The ANNODIS corpus. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uǧur Doǧan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), 2727–2734. Istanbul: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides
2003Logics of conversation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Asr, Fatemeh Torabi & Vera Demberg
2012Implicitness of discourse relations. In Martin Kay & Christian Boitet (eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical papers, 2669–2684. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
2020Interpretation of discourse connectives is probabilistic: Evidence from the study of but and although . Discourse Processes 57(4). 376–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benamara Zitoune, Farah & Maite Taboada
2015Mapping different rhetorical relation annotations: A proposal. In Martha Palmer, Gemma Boleda & Paolo Rosso (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (SEM 2015), 147–152. Denver, CO: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cain, Kate & Hannah M. Nash
2011The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology 103(2). 429–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canestrelli, Anneleos R., Willem M. Mak & Ted J. M. Sanders
2013Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(9). 1394–1413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu & Mary Ellen Okurowski
2002RST Discourse Treebank, LDC2002T07. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
2020Weak and strong discourse markers in speech, chat, and writing: Do signals compensate for ambiguity in explicit relations? Discourse Processes 57(9). 793–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das, Debopam
2014Signalling of coherence relations in discourse. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University PhD thesis.
Das, Debopam & Maite Taboada
2018Signalling of coherence relations in discourse, beyond discourse markers. Discourse Processes 55(8). 743–770. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das, Debopam, Maite Taboada & Paul McFetridge
2015RST Signalling Corpus, LDC2015T10. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2019Causal relations between discourse and grammar: Because in spoken French and Dutch. In Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal & Adriana Cruz (eds.), 131–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Monika
2003Discourse relators and the beginnings of sentences in English and German. Languages in Contrast 3(2). 223–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2017Contrastive discourse relations in context: Evidence from monologic and dialogic editing tasks. In Rachel Giora & Michael Haugh (eds.), Doing pragmatics interculturally: Cognitive, philosophical, and sociopragmatic perspectives, 269–292. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018aDiscourse analysis. In Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Methods in pragmatics, 395–424. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bThe encoding and signalling of discourse relations in argumentative discourse: Evidence across production formats. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction, 13–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Augustin Speyer
2012Discourse relations in context: Local and not-so-local constraints. Intercultural Pragmatics 9(4). 413–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker
Givón, T.
1993English grammar: A function-based introduction (21 vols.). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoek, Jet & Sandrine Zufferey
2015Factors influencing the implicitation of discourse relations across languages. In Harry Bunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-11), 39–45. London: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hoek, Jet, Sandrine Zufferey, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J. M. Sanders
2019The linguistic marking of coherence relations: Interactions between connectives and segment-internal elements. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(2). 275–309.Google Scholar
Hofmockel, Carolin, Anita Fetzer & Robert M. Maier
2017Discourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse. Argument & Computation 8(2). 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klumm, Matthias
2022The signaling of continuative and contrastive discourse relations in English argumentative discourse: Corpus-based and experimental perspectives. Discours [Online] 301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana
2017Coherence relations and information structure in English and French political speeches. In Karin Aijmer & Diana Lewis (eds.), Contrastive analysis of discourse-pragmatic aspects of linguistic genres, 141–161. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal & Adriana Cruz
(eds.) 2019Empirical studies of the construction of discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maier, Robert M., Carolin Hofmockel & Anita Fetzer
2016The negotiation of discourse relations in context: Co-constructing degrees of overtness. Intercultural Pragmatics 13(1). 71–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William & Sandra Thompson
1988Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3). 243–281.Google Scholar
Murray, John D.
1997Connectives and narrative text: The role of continuity. Memory and Cognition 25(2). 227–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prasad, Rashmi, Bonnie Webber, Alan Lee & Aravind Joshi
2019Penn Discourse Treebank Version 3.0, LDC2019T05. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Renkema, Jan
(ed.) 2009Discourse, of course. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M.
2005Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In Michel Aurnague, Myriam Bras, Anne Le Draoulec & Laure Vieu (eds.), Proceedings/Actes SEM-05: First International Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning, 105–114. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-le-Mirail.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M. & Leo G. M. Noordman
2000The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29(1). 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M. & Wilbert P. M. Spooren
2009The cognition of discourse coherence. In Jan Renkema (ed.), 197–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., Wilbert P. M. Spooren, Leo G. M. Noordman
1992Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes 15(1). 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M., Vera Demberg, Jet Hoek, Merel C. J. Scholman, Fatemeh Torabi Asr, Sandrine Zufferey & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2021Unifying dimensions in coherence relations: How various annotation frameworks are related. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(1). 1–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, Erwin M., Judith F. Duchan & Paula J. Scott
1991The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 14(1). 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite
2006Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics 38(4). 567–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Implicit and explicit coherence relations. In Jan Renkema (ed.), 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, Mathis, Sandrine Zufferey & Pascal Gygax
2022How robust is discourse processing for native readers? The role of connectives and the coherence relations they convey. Frontiers in Psychology 131: 822151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeyrek, Deniz, Amália Mendes & Murathan Kurfali
2018Multi-lingual extension of PDTB-style annotation: The case of TED multi-lingual discourse bank. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uǧur Doǧan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), 1913–1919. Miyazaki, Japan: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine
2014Givenness, procedural meaning and connectives: The case of French puisque . Journal of Pragmatics 621. 121–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, Sandrine, Willem M. Mak, Sara Verbrugge & Ted J. M. Sanders
2018Usage and processing of the French causal connectives car and parce que . Journal of French Language Studies 28(1). 85–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar