Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 1:1 (1994) ► pp.145150
Bolinger, D. L.
(1952) Linear modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 671: 1117–1144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and points of view. In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 26–56.Google Scholar
(1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (ed.) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 21–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(1969) Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, F.
(1964) A three-level approach to syntax. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11: 225–240.Google Scholar
Geluykens, R.
(1988) Five types of clefting in English discourse. Linguistics 261: 823–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press) The Pragmatics of Discourse Anaphora in English: Evidence from Conversational Repair. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo
Givón, T.
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 21. Journal of Linguistics 31: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. and G. F. Arnold
(1973) The Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F.
(1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J. and R. Quirk
(eds.) (1980) A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar