Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 24:3 (2017) ► pp.319347


The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available online at [URL].
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000Transitivity in Tariana. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 145–172.Google Scholar
Amberber, Menigstu
2000Valency-changing and valency-encoding devices in Amharic. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 312–332.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2010Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-hierarchy and clause-linking: The syntax and pragmatics interface, 51–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Diagrammatic iconicity in stem – inflection relations. In John Haiman (ed.), 11–47.Google Scholar
2010Markedness: Iconicity, economy and frequency. In J. Jung Song (ed.), Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 131–147. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Sandra Thomspon
1997Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 378–388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Maria Polinsky
(eds.) 1993Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2007Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 251. 108–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Iconicity of sequence. A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 191. 457–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
(eds.) 2000Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
1985Competing motivations. In John Haiman (ed.), 343–365.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry
1970Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2010Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1980The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4(3). 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1983Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1985Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), 87–120.Google Scholar
2005Universals of causative verb formation. Paper presented at LSA Institute, MIT, LSA.206, 2 August 2005.
2008aCreating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Change, 185–214. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bFrequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci
2014Coding causal – noncausal verb alternations: A form – frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 501. 587–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Leanne
1982How to cause in Mixtec. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, 354–363.Google Scholar
Hollmann, Willem B.
2004The iconicity of infinitival complementation in Present-day English causatives. In Constantino Maeder, Olga Fischer, & William J. Herlofsky (eds.), Outside-in – inside-out: Iconicity in language and literature, 287–306. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
1994On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen
1994The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 51. 115–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
1993The “second causative”: A typological sketch. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), 121–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randi J.
2000Valency-changing derivations in Dulong/Rawang. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 282–311.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappoport Hovav
1995Unaccusativity: At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2015bEuropean analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 487–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Why we need a token-based typology: A case study of analytic and lexical causatives in fifteen European languages. Folia Linguistica 50(2). 507–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson
2001Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1969Nekotoryje verojatnostnyje universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazonanii [Some probabilistic universals in verbal derivation]. In I. F. Vardul’ (ed.), Jazykovyje universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1976Kausativkonstruktionen. Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar
Patterson, Betty S. J.
1974A study of Korean causatives. Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 6(4). 1–52.Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tilly & Edward Gibson
2011Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. PNAS 108(9). 3526–3529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2014R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2003Aspects of iconicity and economy in the choice between the s-genitive and the of-genitive in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 379–411. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2005New York, Dayton (Ohio), and the Raw Frequency Fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2. 295–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steger, Maria & Edgar W. Schneider
2012Complexity as a function of iconicity: The case of complement clause constructions in New Englishes. In Bernd Kortmann & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, 156–191. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John
2012The Mental Corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie & Suzanne Kemmer
1997Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 241. 61–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George K.
1949Human behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Uljas, Sami
2021. Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.