Variation between modal adverbs in British English
The cases of maybe and perhaps
Daisuke Suzuki | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | Setsunan University | Kyoto University
This study investigates the use and distribution of the synonymous adverbs maybe and perhaps in
order to determine their functional similarities and differences. After extracting usage data from the British National Corpus
(BNC), this study explores the following factors by analyzing the target adverbs in a larger context: (i) the kind of register,
(ii) the kind of NP chosen as the subject in maybe/perhaps clauses, (iii) the kind of modal verb used in the same
clause, and (iv) the position occupied by the target adverbs in a clause. The corpus analysis demonstrates that
maybe is more prone to subjective use while perhaps is a more strongly grammaticalized item,
and that the factors related to a highly subjective context contribute much to the variation between the adverbs. In addition, I
suggest that both maybe and perhaps (in combination with modal verbs or in final position) can
be used in an intersubjective context.
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges (eds.). 2014. Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language
change. Leiden: Brill.
Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2). 337–351.
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 111. 1–34.
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech & Susan Conrad. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 21. 119–127.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and form. London: Longman.
Brinton, Laurel J.2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: CUP.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 821. 711–733.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Ernst, Thomas. 2004. Principles of adverbial distribution in the lower clause. Lingua 1141. 755–777.
Ernst, Thomas. 2009. Speaker-oriented adverbs. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 271. 497–544.
Ernst, Thomas. 2010. Adverbs and light verbs. In Lauren E. Clemens & Chi-Ming L. Liu (eds.), Proceedings of the 22rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) and the 18th International Conference
on Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18) 2, 178–195. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Facchinetti, Roberta, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.). 2003. Modality in contemporary English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fowler, Henry W.2004. Fowler’s modern English usage, 3rd edn. Revised by Robert W. Burchfield. Oxford: OUP.
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English adverbial usage. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.
Halliday, M. A. K.1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 61. 322–361.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken
English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3603–3623.
Haselow, Alexander. 2012a. Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds.), English historical linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical
Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 153–175. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Haselow, Alexander. 2012b. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in
English. Language and Communication 32(3). 182–204.
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 375–424.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and modality in English. London: Longman.
Hoye, Leo & Mihai Zdrenghea. 1995. Modals and adverbs in English with reference to Romanian. Rask 21. 25–50.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What must and can must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 11. 337–355.
Lakoff, Robin. 1972. The pragmatics of modality. CLS 81. 229–246.
Langacker, Ronald W.1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 5–38.
Langacker, Ronald W.1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.
Larkin, Don. 1976. Some notes on English modals. In James D. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground, 387–398. New York: Academic Press.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb, 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and rhetoric: Adverbial connectors in the history of English. Berlin: Mouton.
Lindquist, Hans. 2009. Corpus linguistics and the description of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Longman Language Activator, 2nd edn. 2002. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I., Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.). 2013. English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality. Berlin: Mouton.
Oxford Thesaurus of English, 3rd edn. 2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palmer, Frank R.1990. Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.
Palmer, Frank R.2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Papafragou, Anna. 2006. Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 1161. 1688–1702.
Perkins, Michael R.1983. Modal expressions in English. London: Pinter.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause
linkers in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 205–249. Berlin: Mouton.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2005. Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11. 1–43.
Swan, Michael. 2005. Practical English usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus.
Tancredi, Christopher. 2007. A multi-model modal theory of I-semantics: Part I: Modals. Tokyo: University of Tokyo manuscript.
Tottie, Gunnel. 2002. An introduction to American English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651. 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell.
Traugott, Elizabeth C.2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.