Article published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 27:3 (2020) ► pp.280–306
Give as a light verb
Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) have received widespread attention. Research on these constructions, however, has for the most part focused exclusively on their syntactic and lexical-semantic properties. Additionally, studies devoted to specific LVCs tend to neglect the phrasal-semantic and pragmatic variation brought about by the combination of a light verb with different nominal complements. This paper tries to fill those gaps by means of a quantitative and qualitative corpus-based study of Light give Constructions (LgiveCs). The quantitative analysis investigates frequencies of LgiveCs in British English and compares them across spoken and written (fiction) discourse, which reveals a high frequency of this construction in speech, especially in combinations of give with a ring, a kiss and an answer. When these combinations are excluded, LgiveCs are significantly more frequent in writing. In a complementary qualitative approach, we highlight the structural and discursive features of the construction and attempt to explore the factors that motivate the frequent use of the LgiveC in British English.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2. give as a light verb
- 3.Research goals and methodology
- 4.Light give in spoken and written (fiction) discourse: Frequency and distribution
- 5.The form and meaning of the LgiveC
- 5.1Semantic features
- 5.2Patterns of modification and transitivity
- 5.3Grammatical choices within the verb phrase
- 5.4Summary
- 6.The LgiveC in context
- 6.1Discourse-organisation and textual meanings
- 6.2Intersubjective and interactional meanings
- 6.3Summary
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Algeo, John
1995 Having a look at the expanded predicate. In Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description, 203–217. Cambridge: CUP.
Alsina, Alex
1993 Predicate composition: A theory of syntactic function alternations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD thesis.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bowern, Claire
Brugman, Claudia
2001 Light verbs and polysemy. Language Sciences 23(4.5). 551–578. 
Butt, Miriam
2003 The light verb jungle. In Gülsat Aygen, Claire Bowern & Conor Quinn (eds.), Harvard working papers in linguistics. Volume 9 of papers from the GSAS/Dudley house workshop on light verbs, 1–49. Harvard, MA: Harvard University.
2010 The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 48–78. Cambridge: CUP.
Davies, Mark
2004– BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at [URL]
Downing, Angela
2015 English grammar: A university course. London: Routledge.
Firbas, Jan
1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: CUP.
Goldberg, Adele
2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224.
2013 Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: OUP.
Granger, Sylviane & Fanny Meunier
Hannay, Mike & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2017 Effective writing in English: A sourcebook, 3rd edn. Bussum: Coutinho.
Hilpert, Martin
2014 Collostructional analysis: Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 391–404. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Huddleston, Rodney
2002 The clause: Complements. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), 213–321.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hunston, Susan & John Sinclair
2000 A local grammar of evaluation. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 74–101. Oxford: OUP.
Kearns, Kate
1988/2002 Light verbs in English. Manuscript, MIT.
Kittilä, Seppo
2006 The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity. Linguistics 44(3). 569–612.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith
2009 Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: CUP.
Live, Anna H.
1973 The take-have phrasal in English. Linguistics 11(95). 31–50.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
2014 Projection as a fractal motif: Semantic and lexicogrammatical manifestations. Draft.
Mondorf, Britta
2016 “Snake legs it to freedom”: Dummy it as pseudo-object. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1). 73–102.
Muller, Ernst-August
1978 Funktionsverbgefuge vom Typ ‘give a smile’ und ähnliche Konstruktionen. Eine textorientierte Untersuchung im Ahmen eines doppelschichtigen Semantikmodells. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Newman, John
1996 Give: A cognitive linguistic study. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Newman, John and Sally Rice
2006 Transitivity schemas of English EAT and DRINK in the BNC. In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 225–260. Berlin: Mouton.
Palmer, Martha, David Gildea & Paul Kingsbury
2005 The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 31(1). 71–106.
Sinclair, John
(ed. in chief) 1990 Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: Harper Collins.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan T. Gries
2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243.
Stein, Gabriele
1991 The phrasal verb type “to have a look” in Modern English. International Review of Applied Linguistics 291. 1–29.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1982 Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language 58(4). 753–799.
Wilson, Andrew
2009 Speech, writing and discourse type. In Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak & Tony McEnery (eds.), English language: Description, variation and context, 425–438. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wittenberg, Eva
2016 With light verb constructions from syntax to concepts. Potsdam Cognitive Science Series, vol. 7. Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Wittenberg, Eva, Ray Jackendoff, Gina Kuperberg, Martin Paczynski, Jesse Snedeker & Heike Wiese
2014 The processing and representation of light verb constructions. In Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy & Linnaea Stockall (eds.), Structuring the argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure (Language Faculty and Beyond 10), 61–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.