Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 17:1 (2010) ► pp.101112
Butler, Christopher S.
2003Structure and function. A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Studies in Language Companion Series 631).Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1997The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. 2nd edn. Ed. Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Functional Grammar Series 201).Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P.
2000A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Functional Grammar Series 2061). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
1990A student’s grammar of the English language. London. Longman.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts. Syntax and semantics 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part I. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994An introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter
1998Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
1996English nominalizations in the layered model of the sentence. In Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Complex structures. A functionalist perspective, 325–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Functional Grammar series 171). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Pamela Faber
2002Functional Grammar and lexical templates. In Ricardo Mairal Usón & María Jesús Pérez Quintero (eds.), New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar, 39–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005Brothers in arms? On the relations between Cognitive and Functional Linguistics? In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 69–100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 321).Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1992On verbal irony. Lingua 871. 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N.
1973Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul
1999Text worlds. Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman/ Pearson Education Ltd.: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar