Cover not available
Review article published In:
Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics perspectives
Edited by J.R. Martin
[Functions of Language 25:1] 2018
► pp. 2–19
Introduction

Interpersonal meaning

Systemic Functional Linguistics perspectives

| University of Sydney

This introduction comprises four main sections. Section 1 introduces the overall theoretical architecture of Systemic Functional Linguistics (hereafter SFL) by way of contextualising the focus on interpersonal grammar in this special issue. Section 2 looks in more detail at the interpersonal discourse semantics underlying this work, briefly introducing the systems of negotiation and appraisal realised through interpersonal grammar. Section 3 turns to the concept of grammatical metaphor, a concept which bears critically on the realisation relationship between interpersonal discourse semantics and lexicogrammar in SFL. Section 4 comments on the challenge of intradisciplinary dialogue.

Article outline
  • 1.Systemic Functional Linguistics and interpersonal meaning
  • 2.The discourse semantics of interpersonal meaning in SFL
  • 3.The concept of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in SFL
  • 4.Intradisciplinarity
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17018.mar
References
Bartlett, Tom & Gerard O’Grady
(eds.) 2017 Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
1981a Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1981b Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.
2003a Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause (Studies in Language Companion Series 63). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003b Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond (Studies in Language Companion Series 64). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. & Miriam Taverniers
2008a Introduction. Linguistics 46(4). 679–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Layering in structural-functional grammars. Linguistics 46(4). 689–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1982 The de-automatization of grammar: From Priestley’s ‘An Inspector Calls’. In John M. Anderson (ed.), Language form and linguistic variation: Papers dedicated to Angus MacIntosh, 129–159. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Language as code and language as behaviour: A systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In Robin P. Fawcett, M. A. K. Halliday, Sydney M. Lamb & Adam Makkai (eds.), The Semiotics of language and culture: Vol 1: Language as social semiotic, 3–35. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1985 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1988 On the language of physical science. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (Open Linguistics Series), 162–178. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1996 On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David G. Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory in practice (Current Issues in Linguistics Theory 121), 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014 An introduction to functional grammar , 4th edn., revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
2007 Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Volume 1: Clause structure, 276–324. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Incongruent and proud: De/vilifying ‘nominalisation’. Discourse & Society 19(6). 801–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Semantic variation: Modelling system, text and affiliation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2007 Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2nd revised edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., Pin Wang & Yongsheng Zhu
2013 Systemic Functional Grammar: A next step into the theory – axial relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2004 Descriptive motifs and generalisations. In Alice Caffarel, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), 537–673. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Halliday on language. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), 137–202.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & M. A. K. Halliday
2009 Systemic Functional Grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Mwinlaaru, Isaac Nuokyaa-Ire & Wenhui W. Xuan
2016 A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology. Functional Linguistics 3(8). [URL] DOI logo
Mwinlaaru, Isaac Nuokyaa-Ire, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Ernest S. Akerejola
in press. A system-based typology of mood in Niger-Congo languages. In Augustine Agwuele & Adams Bodomo eds. The Routledge handbook of African Linguistics London Routledge DOI logo
Oteíza, Teresa
2017 The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 457–472.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy & R. Malcolm Coulthard
1975 Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Tann, Ken
2017 Context and meaning in the Sydney architecture of SFL. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 438–456.Google Scholar
Teruya, Kazuhiro, Ernest Akerejola, Thomas H. Anderson, Alice Caffarel, Julia Lavid, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, Uwe Helm Petersen, Pattama Patpong & Flemming Smedegaard
2007 Typology of mood: A text-based and system-based functional view. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective. Volume 21, 859–920. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Teruya, Kazuhiro & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2015 Halliday in relation to language comparison and typology. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), 427–452.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005 The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Language and Linguistics 6(4). 807–837.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1987 The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Webster, Jonathan J.
(ed.) 2015 The Bloomsbury companion to M.A.K. Halliday. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 20 other publications

Bangga, Lungguh Ariang & Y. J. Doran
2021. A Systemic Functional Sketch of Material Clauses in Sundanese. <i>WORD</i> 67:2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Bartlett, Tom
2021. Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo
Du, Yixuan
2021. 2021 2nd International Conference on Computers, Information Processing and Advanced Education, ► pp. 1573 ff. DOI logo
Figueredo, Giacomo
2021. Interpersonal Grammar in Brazilian Portuguese. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Geng, Fang
2022. A contrastive study of the Chinese and Japanese mood type systems. Journal of World Languages 8:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Li, Dongqi
2024.  J. R. Martin, Beatriz Quiroz & Pin Wang. 2023. Systemic functional grammar: A text-based description of English, Spanish and Chinese . Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo
Martin, J. R.
2024. Intradisciplinarity: can one theory do it all?. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Martin, J. R. & Priscilla Cruz
2021. Interpersonal Grammar in Tagalog: Assessment Systems. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Martin, J. R., Beatriz Quiroz & Giacomo Figueredo
2021. Introduction: Theory and Description in Interpersonal Grammar across Languages. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Martin, James R.
2019. Once more with feeling. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
O’Farrell, Kate
2022. “Completely incapable of logical thought”. Internet Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Rose, David
2021. Interpersonal Grammar of Pitjantjatjara. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Tian, Lili
2024. An Innovative Demonstration of Functional Linguistic Ideas for Teaching English in Colleges and Universities Based on Multi-objective Optimization Models. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Wang, Pin
2021. Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Bingjun & Hongmiao Gao
2023. Polarity metaphor in English: Definition, identification, and categorization. Lingua 295 ► pp. 103623 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2020. Dialogic positioning in Khorchin Mongolian: The temporal and spatial dimensions of propositional engagement in conversations. Lingua 244 ► pp. 102920 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2020. Towards a discourse semantic characterisation of the modal particles in Khorchin Mongolian: A case study of an interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 158 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Dynamism in knowledge exchanges: developing move systems based on Khorchin Mongolian interactions. Discourse Studies 23:3 ► pp. 386 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Interpersonal Grammar in Khorchin Mongolian. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.