Cover not available
Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 18:1 (2011) ► pp.96–107
Book review

Rolf Kailuweit, Björn Wiemer, Eva Staudinger & Ranko Matasović (eds.). New applications of Role and Reference Grammar: Diachrony, grammaticalization, Romance languages. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008. xx+438 pp. ISBN 9781847184092

Reviewed by
| Universidad de La Rioja
Published online: 20 June 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.1.06mar
References (35)
References
Butler, Christopher S. 2003a. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories, Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003b. Structure and function: A guide to the three major structural-functional theories, Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneš, František. 1964. A three-level approach to syntax. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11. 225–240.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
. 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1974. Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of Functional Sentence Perspective. In František Daneš (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, 11–37. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 251. 127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles (ed.). 1975. Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1977. Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Martín Arista, Javier. 2001. Sintaxis medieval I: complementación, caso y sintaxis verbal. In Isabel de la Cruz Cabanillas & Javier Martin Arista (eds.), Lingüistica histórica inglesa, 224–312. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Martin Arista, Javier. 2008. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), 119–145.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1). 56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Heads in discourse: structural versus functional centricity. In Greville Corbett, Norman Fraser & Scott McGlashan (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 164–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge. Massachusetts: MIT.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1990. Layered syntax in Role and Reference Grammar. In Jan Nuyts, Machtelt Bolkestein & Co Vet (eds.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory, 193–231. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1993. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar. In Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), 161–178.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & William Foley. 1980. Role and Reference Grammar. In Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Current approaches to syntax. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 131, 329–352. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & David Wilkins. 1993. Predicting syntax from semantics. In Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, 499–534. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Case for ‘Effector’: Case roles, agents and agency revisited. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra Thompson (eds.) Grammatical constructions. Their form and meaning, 289–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus. 1984 (1963). An historical syntax of the English language, Volume 1: Syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar