Article published In:
On mood and speech function and the ‘why’ of text analysis: In honour of Margaret Berry
Edited by Lise Fontaine, Miriam Taverniers and Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 26:1] 2019
► pp. 86111
References

References

Athanasiadou, Angeliki
1991The discourse function of questions. Pragmatics 11. 107–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axelsson, Karin
2011Tag questions in fiction dialogue. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg PhD thesis. Available online at [URL]
Bald, Wolf-Dietrich
1979English tag questions and intonation. In Kuno Schumann (ed.), Anglistentag, 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Gayle Elam Ayers
1993Guidelines for ToBI labelling: The Ohio State University Research Foundation. Available online at [URL]
Berry, Margaret
1981aSystemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1981bTowards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.Google Scholar
1981cPolarity, ellipticity and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. (A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move.) Nottingham Linguistic Circular 101. 36–63.Google Scholar
2016Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction 91. 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2015Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.04. [URL]
Burton, Deirdre
1980Dialogue and discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm & David Brazil
1979Exchange structure. Discourse Analysis Monographs 6. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Margaret Seltink & Paul Drew
1996Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte
2007Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics 391. 270–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Bert Cornillie
2014A speech function analysis of tag questions in British English spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 661. 64–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Eirian
2001Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language 81. 217–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2012What drives sequences? Research of Language and Social Interaction 451. 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
1997Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1964English system networks. In Gunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers (1976), 101–135. London: OUP.Google Scholar
1970Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 61. 322–361.Google Scholar
1985An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond
2005The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 681. 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
Martin, James
1981How many speech acts? In Wang Zhenhua (ed.), Discourse Semantics: Collected Works of J. R. Martin. Vol. 21 (2010), 35–57. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Google Scholar
1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
1990A dynamic model of exchange. WORD 411. 293–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A grammar of spoken English discourse. The intonation of increments. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2013Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2016Given/New: What do the terms refer to? A first (small) step. English Text Construction 91. 7–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rose, David
2014Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 11. 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel & Harvey Sacks
1973Opening up Closings. Semiotica 71. 289–327.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an analysis of discourse. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1984Questions and responses in English conversation. Lund Studies in English 68. Lund: Liber/Gleerups.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2014A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsui, Amy
1994English conversation. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1987The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the coordinate-subordinate dichotomy. Interpersonal grammar and the analysis of adverbial clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Beauchamp, David & Sheena Gardner
2023. A trinocular view of the auxiliary verb will in COVID-19 briefings from Westminster and Holyrood. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Berry, Margaret
2021. Inequalities in status: How do they show in discourse and what can be done about them?. Lingua 261  pp. 102924 ff. DOI logo
Berry, Margaret & Sarah Jane Mukherjee
Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo
Forey, Gail
2022. Margaret Berry. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:1  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.