Introduction
Introduction
This article is available free of charge.
References (24)
References
Berry, Margaret. 1975. An introduction to Systemic Linguistics: I Structures and systems. London: Batsford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1977. An introduction to Systemic Linguistics: II Levels and links. London: Batsford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1979. A note on Sinclair and Coulthard’s classes of acts including a comment on comments. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 81. 49–59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1981a. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1881b. Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1981c. Polarity, ellipticity and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. (A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move.) Nottingham Linguistic Circular 101. 36–63.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1995. Thematic options and success in writing. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 55–84. London: Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 1996. What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. In Margaret Berry, Christophe Butler, Robin Fawcett, Guowen Huang (eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic Functional interpretations. Meaning and choice in language. Studies for Michael Halliday, 1–64. Norwood: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berry, Margaret. 2013. Contentful and contentlight subject themes in informal spoken English and formal written English. In Gerard O’Grady, Tom Bartlett & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butler, Christopher. 1982. The directive function of the English modals. Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cloran, Carmel. 1994. Rhetorical units and decontextualisation: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning and grammar. Monographs In Systemic Linguistics 3. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davidse, Kristin. 1999. Categories of experiential grammar. Monographs In Systemic Linguistics 11. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, T. R. 1992. Towards a Discourse Theory of Abstracts and Abstracting. Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. 1959. The language of the Chinese “Secret History of the Mongols”. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Publications of the Philological Society XVII.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hillier, Hillary. 1990. The Language of Spontaneous Interaction between Children Aged 7–12: Instigating Action. Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney. 1977. Review of An introduction to systemic linguistics, Volume 1: Structures and systems by Margaret Berry. Language 53(1). 190–192.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive application. Volume 21. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Neal, Almein. 1994. Narrative structure in the writing of primary school children in the British Virgin Islands. Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parsons, Gerald. 1995. Measuring cohesion in English texts: The relationship between cohesion and coherence. Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plum, Guenther. 1998. Text and contextual conditioning in spoken English: A genre-based approach. Monographs In Systemic Linguistics 10. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ravelli, Louise. 1999. Metaphor, mode and complexity: An exploration of co-varying patterns. Monographs In Systemic Linguistics 12. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torr, Jane. 1997. From child tongue to mother tongue: A case study of language development in the first two and a half years. Monographs In Systemic Linguistics 9. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Forey, Gail
2022.
Margaret Berry.
Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:1
► pp. 146 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.