Interpersonal functions of interjections
A Systemic Functional perspective
Motivated by the frequent omission of interjections from film subtitles, this study investigates the interpersonal
functions of interjections, and seeks to disentangle their meaning relations. Based on the analysis of interjections
from six English language films under the theoretical framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), the study primarily
classifies the functions of interjections in terms of whether the interjections independently realize moves in exchange. The
function of the interjection which realizes a move on its own is described at the semantic stratum in terms of a minor speech
function, and the function of the interjection which realizes a move together with a clause is described at the lexicogrammatical
stratum in terms of an optional clausal function referred to as a ‘latched function’. The study highlights the distinction between
latched functions and their agnate minor speech functions, and offers more delicate accounts of the functions of interjections. It
proposes a system network of the minor speech functions, which can facilitate a more systematic analysis
of the functions realized by interjections. This study contributes to the SFL description of English interjections, and can offer
methodological insights into further research on the functionality of interjections.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The interjections in question: Data and formal features
- 2.1Interjections as syntactically resistant utterances
- 2.2Interjections as stabilized forms
- 3.Interpersonal functions of interjections
- 3.1Minor speech functions
- 3.1.1Systematizing minor speech functions
- 3.1.2Exemplifying minor speech functions
- A.Exclamation
- B.Call
- C.Alarm (minor speech function)
- D.Greeting
- E.Continuity
- 3.2Latched functions
- 3.2.1Expletive
- 3.2.2Vocative
- 3.2.3Continuative
- 3.2.4Alarm (latched function)
- 3.2.5Negotiator
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
Primary sources
-
References
References (31)
Primary sources
Cambridge Dictionaries Online: [URL]
Collins Dictionaries: [URL]
London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: [URL]
Merriam-Webster Dictionary: [URL]
Oxford English Dictionary: [URL]
Saarbrücken Corpus of Spoken English: [URL]
Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English: [URL]
References
Ameka, Felix K. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2–3). 101–118.
Ameka, Felix K. 2006. Interjections. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 743–746. Oxford: Elsevier.
Georgakopoulou, Panayota. 2009. Subtitling for the DVD industry. In Jorge Díaz Cintas & Gunilla Anderman (eds.), Audiovisual translation: Language transfer on screen, 21–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goddard, Cliff. 2014. Interjections and emotion (with special reference to “surprise” and “disgust”). Emotion Review 6(1). 53–63.
Goffman, Erving. 1978. Response cries. Language 54(4). 787–815.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1961/2002. Categories of the theory of grammar. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol.1. On grammar, 37–94. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1975/2004. Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. In Jonathan Webster (ed.), The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol.4. The Language of early childhood, 28–59. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985/1989. Spoken and written language. Oxford: OUP.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.
James, Deborah. 1973. The syntax and semantics of some English interjections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD thesis.
Martin, J. R. 1981/2010. How many speech acts? In Zhenhua Wang (ed.), Discourse semantics, Vol. 2, 35–57. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
Martin, J. R. 2013. Systemic Functional Grammar: A next step into the theory – axial relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
Norrick, Neal R. 2009. Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5). 866–891.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Wharton, Tim. 2009. Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: CUP.
Wilkins, David P. 1992. Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2–3). 119–158.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Anderson, Jemima Asabea, Ebenezer Agbaglo & Rachel G. A. Thompson
2024.
Exploring Ghanaians’ Usage of ei, ehe, eh, and eish in Global Web-Based English Corpus.
Corpus Pragmatics 8:2
► pp. 131 ff.
Cheng, Shi
2023.
A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022).
Journal of World Languages
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.