There are opposing views on whether speech or writing is more complex syntactically. We investigated the complexity of clause relationships in a range of spoken and written text categories: spontaneous conversations, broadcast discussions, unscripted monologues, personal handwritten letters, academic writing, and non-academic writing. Conversations proved to be the most distinctive category. It had the highest percentage of simple clauses and the lowest percentage of both subordination and coordination. For all the other categories there is not a sharp distinction between speech and writing in any of the measures that were applied.
2021. Writing in the Sciences and Humanities: A Clause-Complex Perspective. <i>WORD</i> 67:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Miller, Jim & Andreea S. Calude
2020. Speaking and Writing English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 547 ff.
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2019. Beyond Length: Investigating Dependency Distance Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels. Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 601 ff.
Huang, Qunying, Lixin Xia & Yun Xia
2018. A Corpus-Based Study on Collocation and Semantic Prosody in China’s English Media: The Case of the Verbs of Publicity. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10829], ► pp. 203 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2018. If-insubordination in spoken British English: Syntactic and pragmatic properties. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 42 ff.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
2017. Spoken Grammar: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?. Applied Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Green, Clarence
2017. Introducing the Corpus of the Canon of Western Literature: A corpus for culturomics and stylistics. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 282 ff.
Green, Clarence
2017. Isomorphic Development and English Clause Combination. In Patterns and Development in the English Clause System, ► pp. 169 ff.
Cantos, Pascual
2012. The Use of Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Linguistic Variation and Change: Types and Computational Applications. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 99 ff.
GONG, SHU-PING & PEI-YAN WU
2012. Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near-synonymy: The HELP Verbs in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages 24:01 ► pp. 3 ff.
Iyeiri, Y., M. Yaguchi & Y. Baba
2011. Principal component analysis of turn-initial words in spoken interactions. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Walker, Crayton
2008. Factors which influence the process of
collocation. In Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, ► pp. 291 ff.
Leong Ping, Alvin & Geok Wee Bee
2005. Investigating the clause complex. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 149-150 ► pp. 47 ff.
Hudson-Ettle, Diana
2002. Nominal that Clauses in Three Regional Varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 258 ff.
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2001. Principles of Pattern Selection. Journal of English Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 295 ff.
Engel, Dulcie M. & Marie-Eve A. Ritz
2000. The Use of the Present Perfect in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
Kirk, John M.
1997. Subordinate Clauses in English. Journal of English Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 349 ff.
GREENBAUM, SIDNEY & GERALD NELSON
1996. Positions of adverbial clauses in British English. World Englishes 15:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
GREENBAUM, SIDNEY & GERALD NELSON
1996. The International Corpus of English (ICE) Project. World Englishes 15:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.