Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 21:3 (2014) ► pp.297332
References
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert
2008Aspect and aspectuality. In Bas Arts & April MacMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 244–269. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J
Büring, Daniel
2005The syntax and semantics of Binding Theory. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1984How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 101. 437–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Thomas
2011Cohesion: A discourse perspective. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cloran, Carmel
2010Rhetorical unit analysis and Bakhtin’s chronotype. Functions of Language 17(1). 29–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2001Grammaticalization and the life cycles of constructions. RASK Internationalt tidsskrift for sprog og kommunikation 141. 91–134.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2008Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 121. 55–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010English -ing clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48(6). 1153–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2005Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3). 449–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Disterheft, Dorothy
1981Remarks on the history of the Indo-European infinitive. Folia Linguistica Historica 2(1). 3–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
2005A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke
2006English grammar: A university course. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
2003Argument structure. In John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick
2006The English gerund-participle: A comparison with infinitives. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & Wim van der Wurff
2006Syntax. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 109–199. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1993English grammar: A function-based introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax: An introduction, Vol. 11. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Bio-linguistics: The Santa Barbara lectures. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Grammar as an adaptive evolutionary product. In Christopher S. Butler, Raquel Downing & Julia Lavid (eds.), Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse: In honour of Angela Downing, 1–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012aThe adaptive approach to grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), 27–51.
2012bToward a diachronic typology of relative clauses. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: A typological overview, 3–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Masayoshi Shibatani
Goldberg, Adele
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1989From purposive to infinitive: A universal path of grammaticization. Folia Linguistica Historica 10(2). 287–310Google Scholar
2004On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 17–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Framework-free grammatical theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), 341–367.
Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog
(eds.) 2012The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
(eds.) 2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huettner, Alison, Marie Vaughan & David D. McDonald
1987Constraints on the generation of adjunct clauses. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics , 207–214.
Knoch, Ute
2009Diagnostic writing assessment: The development and validation of a rating scale. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1988Towards a typology of clause linkage. In John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181–225. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
2002Combining clauses into clause complexes: A multi-faceted view. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 235–319. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moessner, Lilo
2003Diachronic English linguistics: An introduction. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Morris, Jane & Grahame Hirst
1991Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Computational Linguistics 17(1). 21–48.Google Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Sandra Thompson
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Cross-linguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 179–204. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, T.E
2011Understanding English grammar: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam
1988Australian corpus of English. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
(eds.) 1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
(ed.) 1991Collins Cobuild English grammar. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the International Conference on Historical Linguistics 12 , Manchester.
Van Valin Jr., Robert
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Eugene
1977A clause relational approach to English texts: A study of some predicative lexical items in written discourse. International Science 61. 1–92.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Asp, Elissa
2019. In praise of text analysis. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Green, Clarence
2017. Discourse Coherence and Clause Combination. In Patterns and Development in the English Clause System,  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Ortega, Lourdes
2015. Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing 29  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Taboada, Maite
2019. The space of coherence relations and their signalling in discourse. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada
2016. Cataphora, backgrounding and accessibility in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 93  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.