Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 29:2 (2022) ► pp.169198
References (61)
Abercrombie, Gavin & Batista‑Navarro, Riza
2020Sentiment and position‑taking analysis of parliamentary debates: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computational Social Science 31. 245–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
2019Quantifying systemic coupling and syndrome using multivariate statistical methods: An SFL corpus example. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 15(1). 1–38.Google Scholar
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria, Gloria Fernández-Díaz & Isabel Íñigo-Mora
(eds.) 2009Discourse and politics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn
2018Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences 68 1. 22–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argamon, Shlomo, Kenneth Bloom, Andrea Esuli & Fabrizio Sebastiani
2007Automatically determining attitude type and force for sentiment analysis. Paper presented at the LTC 2007, Berlin.
Arya, Apoorva, Vishal Shukla, Arvind Negi & Kapil Gupta
2020A review: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Paper presented at the the International Conference on Innovative Computing & Communications (ICICC) 2020, New Delhi.
Bayley, Paul
2004aThe whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discourse. In Paul Bayley (ed.), 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2004bCross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1995On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation: A reply to Watson. Text 15(3). 341–370.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner
1997Discourse and politics. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction, Vol. 21, 206–230. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Decter-Frain, Ari & Jeremy A. Frimer
2016Impressive words: Linguistic predictors of public approval of the U.S. Congress. Front. Psychol. 7(240). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Jesse M. Shapiro & Matt Taddy
2019Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: Method and application to congressional speech. Econometrica 87(4). 1307–1340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerston, Larry N.
2010Public policy making: Process and principles. Armonk: M.E.Sharpe.Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan
2014Correspondence analysis: Exploring data and identifying patterns. In Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (Human Cognitive Processing 43), 443–485. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, Michael J.
1984Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haarman, Louann & Linda Lombardo
2009Introduction. In Louann Haarman & Linda Lombardo (eds.), Evaluation and stance in war news, 1–26. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1991aCorpus studies and probabilistic grammar. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1991bTowards probabilistic interpretations. In Eija Ventola (ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 39–62. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Horák, Aleš & Pavel Rychlý
2013Methods for detection of word usage over time. In Ondˇrej Herman & Vojtˇech Kováˇr (eds.), Proceedings of the seventh workshop on recent advances in Slavonic natural languages processing, RASLAN 2013, 79–85. Brno: Tribun EU.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2003Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2(1). 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Jacob, Ethan Kaplan, Suresh Naidu & Laurence Wilse-Samson
2012Political polarization and the dynamics of political language: Evidence from 130 years of partisan speech. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 43(2). 1–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenset, Gard B. & Barbara McGillivray
2017Quantitative historical linguistics: A corpus framework. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirvalidze, Nino & Nino Samnidze
2016Political discourse as a subject of interdisciplinary studies. Journal of Teaching and Education 5(1). 161–170.Google Scholar
Křen, Michal
2017Grammatical change: Trends in contemporary Czech newspapers. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 68(2). 238–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, Bertus van Rooy & Adam Smith
2019Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015). Journal of English Linguistics 47(3). 183–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2008Triggering Events. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Topics in English linguistics, Vol. 611, 11–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, Zuhe, Yangyu Fan, Bin Jiang, Tao Lei & Weihua Liu
2019A survey on sentiment analysis and opinion mining for social multimedia. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78(6). 6939–6967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loerts, Hanneke, Wander Lowier & Bregtje Seton
2020Essential statistics for applied linguistics: Using R and JASP. London: Red Globe Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Henry B.
1945Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13(3). 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992English text: System and structure Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2006Frequency profiles of some basic grammatical systems. In Geoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), System and orpus: Exploring connections, 103–142. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Militino, Ana E., Mehdi Moradi & Dolores Ugarte
2020On the performances of trend and change-point detection methods for remote sensing data. Remote Sens. 12(6). 1008–1033. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Richard G.
1974Aristotle’s doctrine that man is a political animal. Hermes 102(3). 438–445.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, Chris & Guenter Plum
1988Probabilities in a systemic-functional grammar: The clause complex in English. In Robin P. Fawcett & David J. Young (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics, Vol. 21, 6–39. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa & Claudia Castro
2019Dictatorship and the Cold War in official Chilean history textbooks. In Barbara Christophe, Peter Gautschi & Robert Thorp (eds.), The Cold War in the classroom: International perspectives on textbooks and memory practices, 221–247. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owoyea, Oluwole & Matthew Dabrosb
2017The analysis of White House occupant and political polarization in the United States. Review of Social Sciences 2(4). 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, Jonathon & John Carroll
2012Annotating expressions of Appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 46(3). 421–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Vergara, Daniel
2015Clause combining in research articles in Spanish and English: A systemic-functional analysis. US-China Foreign Language 13(7). 471–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rokach, Lior
2019Ensemble learning: Pattern classification using ensemble methods (2nd edn.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheckels, Theodore F.
2000When congress debates: A Bakhtinian paradigm. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stadler, Kevin
2016Direction and directedness in language change: An evolutionary model of selection by trend-amplification. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2005New York, Dayton (Ohio), and the raw frequency fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2). 295–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli & Marco R. Steenbergen
2004Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Su, Hang & Monika Bednarek
2018Bibliography of appraisal, stance and evaluation. Available online at [URL]
Taboada, Maite, Julian Brooke, Milan Tofiloski, Kimberly Voll & Manfred Stede
2011Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 37(2). 267–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Jack Grieve
2004Analyzing appraisal automatically. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text, Stanford.
Thornbury, Scott & Diana Slade
2006Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treimane, Laura
2011Analyzing parliamentary discourse: Systemic functional perspective. Kalbotyra 63(3). 78–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1997What is political discourse analysis. In Jan Blommaert & ‎Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Political Linguistics, 11–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Text and context of parliamentary debates. In Paul Bayley (ed.), 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17(3). 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vardanega, Moreno
2016Analysis of sentiment direction based on two centuries of the Hansard Debate Archive. Stirling: University of Stirling unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Vukovic, Milica
2014Strong epistemic modality in parliamentary discourse. Open Linguistics 11. 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuković, Milica
2015Emphasisers in the UK parliamentary language: A diachronic and a synchronic perspective. Paper presented at the ICIFL5, Podgorica.
Załęska, Maria
2012Rhetoric and politics: Mapping the interrelations. In Maria Załęska (ed.), Rhetoric and politics: Mapping the interrelations, 1–19. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, Chris Cléirigh, Paul Dwyer & J. R. Martin
2009The coupling of gesture and phonology. In Monika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 237–266. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.