This paper presents an analysis of the field of perception verbs in Swedish within a typological and contrastive framework. Earlier work has to a great extent focused on the concepts see and hear. This article focuses on the more ‘raw’ form of perception represented by sensations and on the combination of meanings referring to perception and cognition in Swedish känna ‘feel, know’. The polysemy of känna turns out to be very language-specific even in relation to the most closely related Germanic languages. The polysemy of känna is interesting also because this verb can refer to internal (bodily) perception and has an extension that covers blended spaces combining cognitive elements with emotional and bodily feelings (cf. feel remorse, feel convinced). Special attention is paid also to sensory verbs describing sensations of light and sound (cf. English glitter, glimmer, rattle, creak, etc.) and of bodily sensations and pain (cf. ache, itch, etc.) Sensations are interesting because — similar to sensory adjectives — evaluation and intensity are central components of their meaning in addition to the fine-grained description of sensory qualia. There are great differences across languages in the degree of elaboration of sensory verbs referring to sensations. Recent typological work has demonstrated great elaborations of taste verbs in some languages, whereas other languages have elaborated odor verbs. Swedish (similar to many other European languages) has a rich repertoire of sound verbs.
Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism (Gothenburg monographs in Linguistics vol. 171). Gothenburg: Dept. of Linguistics, Gothenburg University.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch. 2013. Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 1–45.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch (eds.). 2013. Perception and cognition in language and culture. Leiden: Brill.
Altenberg, Bengt & Karin Aijmer. 2000. The English-Swedish parallel corpus: A resource for contrastive research and translation studies. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 15–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Anttila, Raimo. 1976. Meaning and structure of Finnish descriptive vocabulary. In Robert T. Harms & Frances Karttunen (eds.), Papers from the transatlantic Finnish conference, 1–12. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Brenzinger, Matthias & Anne-Maria Fehn. 2013. From body to knowledge: Perception and cognition in Khwe-ǁAni and Ts’ixa. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 161–191.
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burenhult, Niclas & Asifa Majid. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. Senses & Society 6(1). 19–29.
Colman, Andrew (ed.). 1994. Companion encyclopedia of psychology. Vol.11. London: Routledge.
Enghels, Renata & Marlies Jansegers. 2013. On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics 51(5). 957–991.
Evans, Nicholas M. & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extension of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592.
Hardin, C.L. & Louisa Maffi (eds.). 1997. Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge: CUP.
Hellquist, Elof. 1898. Om nordiska verb på suffixalt -k, -l, -r, -s och -t samt af dem bildade nomina. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 141. 136–194.
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.
Huumo, Tuomas. 2010. Is perception a directional relationship? On directionality and its motivation in Finnish expressions of sensory perception. Linguistics 48(1). 49–97.
Kluge, Friedrich. 2011/1883). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25th edn. revised by Elmar Seebold. Berlin: Mouton.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Majid, Masifa & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.). 2011. The senses in language and culture. Special issue of Senses & Society 6(1).
Malt, Barbara C. & Phillip Wolff (eds.). 2010. Words and the mind. How words capture human experience. Oxford: OUP.
Maslova, Elena. 2004. A universal constraint on the sensory lexicon, or when hear can mean ‘see’? In Alexandr P. Volodin (ed.), Tipologičeskie obosnovanija v grammatike: k 70-letiju professora Xrakovskogo V.S., 300–312. Moscow: Znak. Retrieved from [URL]
Mather, George. 2006. Foundations of perception. Hove & New York: Psychology Press.
Nakagawa, Hirosi. 2012. The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3). 395–420.
Paradis, Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. In Rosario Caballero (guest ed.), Metaphor in and across genres. Thematic issue of Metaphor and Symbol
28(1). 22–40.
Ralph, Bo. 1991. Strömningar inom ordforskningen. Svenskans beskrivning 181. 9–28. Lund: Lund University Press.
Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, Aubrey L. Gilbert & Richard B Ivry. 2010. Language and thought: Which side are you on, anyway? In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–182.
Reznikova, Tatiana, Ekaterina Rakhilina & Anastasia Bonch-Osmolovskaya. 2012. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3). 421–465.
Roberson, Debi & J. Richard Hanley. 2010. Relatively speaking: An account of the relationship between language and thought in the color domain. In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–198.
Semino, Elena. 2010. Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol 251. 205–226.
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English. A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Storch, Anne. 2013. Knowing, smelling and telling tales in Luwo. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 47–68.
Strik Lievers, Francesca. 2007. Italian perception verbs. A corpus-based study. In Sansò, Andrea (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory, 167–179. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP.
Viberg, Åke. 1980. Tre semantiska fält i svenskan och andra språk. SSM Report 7. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL].
Viberg, Åke. 1983. Studier i kontrastiv lexikologi: Perceptionsverb. SSM Report 8. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL]
Viberg, Åke. 1984. The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics 21(1). 123–162.
Viberg, Åke. 2001. The verbs of perception. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, 1294–1309. Berlin: Mouton.
Viberg, Åke. 2009. The meaning patterns of Swedish låta ‘sound’; ‘let’. A corpus-based contrastive study. In Petra Bernardini, Verner Egerland & Jonas Granfeldt (eds.), Mélanges plurilingues offerts à Suzanne Schlyter à l’occasion de son 65ème anniversaire. [Études romanes de Lund 85], 455–480. Lund: University of Lund.
Viberg, Åke. 2010. Swedish impersonal constructions from a crosslinguistic perspective. An exploratory corpus-based study. Orientalia Suecana 591. 122–158. Available at: [URL]
Viberg, Åke. 2012. Language-specific meanings in contrast: A corpus-based contrastive study of Swedish få ‘get’. In Alexandra Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (guest eds.), The art of getting: Get verbs in European languages from a synchronic and diachronic point of view. Thematic issue of Linguistics
50(6). 1413–1461.
van de Weijer, Joost, Ivana Bianchi & Carita Paradis
2024. Sensory modality profiles of antonyms. Language and Cognition 16:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Hartman, Jenny & Carita Paradis
2023. The language of sound: events and meaning multitasking of words. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 445 ff.
Wu, Shuqiong & Yue Ou
2023.
A quantitative study of the polysemy of Mandarin Chinese perception verb
kàn
‘look/see’
. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 191 ff.
Poulton, Thomas
2022. Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Przemysław Staniewski: The linguistics of olfaction: Typological and diachronic approaches to synchronic diversity
. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 693 ff.
SEÇKİN, Kuban
2022. DERLEME SÖZLÜĞÜ’NE GÖRE TÜRKİYE TÜRKÇESİ AĞIZLARINDA “DÜŞÜN-” FİİLİ. Motif Akademi Halk Bilimi Dergisi
2020. Soundscapes in English and Spanish: a corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition 12:4 ► pp. 705 ff.
Hellerstedt, Maria & Rea Peltola
2020. Le chemin de l’audible : la structuration dynamique de la perception par les verbes höras (suédois) et kuulua (finnois) « être audible ». Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
PROOS, MARIANN
2020. Feeling your neighbour: an experimental approach to the polysemy oftundma‘to feel’ in Estonian. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 282 ff.
Viberg, Åke
2020. Phenomenon-Based Perception Verbs in Swedish from a Typological and Contrastive Perspective. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
2018. Being perceptible: Animacy, existentiality and intersubjectivity in constructions with the Finnish verbkuulua‘to be perceptible (through hearing)’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Peltola, Rea
2023. Verbalizing animal inner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 217 ► pp. 109 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.