Article published In:
Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 96131
References (50)
Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism (Gothenburg monographs in Linguistics vol. 171). Gothenburg: Dept. of Linguistics, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch. 2013. Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 1–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.). 2013. Perception and cognition in language and culture. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Karin Aijmer. 2000. The English-Swedish parallel corpus: A resource for contrastive research and translation studies. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 15–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1976. Meaning and structure of Finnish descriptive vocabulary. In Robert T. Harms & Frances Karttunen (eds.), Papers from the transatlantic Finnish conference, 1–12. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias & Anne-Maria Fehn. 2013. From body to knowledge: Perception and cognition in Khwe-ǁAni and Ts’ixa. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 161–191.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Asifa Majid. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. Senses & Society 6(1). 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colman, Andrew (ed.). 1994. Companion encyclopedia of psychology. Vol.11. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata & Marlies Jansegers. 2013. On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics 51(5). 957–991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas M. & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extension of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C.L. & Louisa Maffi (eds.). 1997. Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellquist, Elof. 1898. Om nordiska verb på suffixalt -k, -l, -r, -s och -t samt af dem bildade nomina. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 141. 136–194.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hummelstedt, Eskil. 1939. Östsvenska verbstudier. Helsingfors: Centraltryckeriet.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2010. Is perception a directional relationship? On directionality and its motivation in Finnish expressions of sensory perception. Linguistics 48(1). 49–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 2011/1883). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25th edn. revised by Elmar Seebold. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lascaratou, Chryssoula. 2007. The language of pain: Expression or description. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Majid, Masifa & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.). 2011. The senses in language and culture. Special issue of Senses & Society 6(1).Google Scholar
Malt, Barbara C. & Phillip Wolff (eds.). 2010. Words and the mind. How words capture human experience. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2004. A universal constraint on the sensory lexicon, or when hear can mean ‘see’? In Alexandr P. Volodin (ed.), Tipologičeskie obosnovanija v grammatike: k 70-letiju professora Xrakovskogo V.S., 300–312. Moscow: Znak. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Mather, George. 2006. Foundations of perception. Hove & New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hirosi. 2012. The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3). 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. In Rosario Caballero (guest ed.), Metaphor in and across genres. Thematic issue of Metaphor and Symbol 28(1). 22–40.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina & Petyer Holz (eds.). 2007. Speaking of colors and odors. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Bo. 1991. Strömningar inom ordforskningen. Svenskans beskrivning 181. 9–28. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, Aubrey L. Gilbert & Richard B Ivry. 2010. Language and thought: Which side are you on, anyway? In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reznikova, Tatiana, Ekaterina Rakhilina & Anastasia Bonch-Osmolovskaya. 2012. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3). 421–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberson, Debi & J. Richard Hanley. 2010. Relatively speaking: An account of the relationship between language and thought in the color domain. In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2010. Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol 251. 205–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English. A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Storch, Anne. 2013. Knowing, smelling and telling tales in Luwo. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 47–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca. 2007. Italian perception verbs. A corpus-based study. In Sansò, Andrea (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory, 167–179. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2008. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change. Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 341–370. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1980. Tre semantiska fält i svenskan och andra språk. SSM Report 7. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL].
. 1983. Studier i kontrastiv lexikologi: Perceptionsverb. SSM Report 8. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL]
. 1984. The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics 21(1). 123–162.Google Scholar
. 1999. Polysemy and differentiation in the lexicon. Verbs of physical contact in Swedish. In Jens Allwood & Peter Gärdenfors (eds.), Cognitive semantics. Meaning and cognition, 87–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The verbs of perception. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, 1294–1309. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2005. The lexical typological profile of Swedish mental verbs. Languages in Contrast 5(1). 121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Towards a lexical profile of the Swedish verb lexicon. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(1). 103–129.Google Scholar
. 2008. Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González-Álvarez (eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast and comparison, 123–172. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The meaning patterns of Swedish låta ‘sound’; ‘let’. A corpus-based contrastive study. In Petra Bernardini, Verner Egerland & Jonas Granfeldt (eds.), Mélanges plurilingues offerts à Suzanne Schlyter à l’occasion de son 65ème anniversaire. [Études romanes de Lund 85], 455–480. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
. 2010. Swedish impersonal constructions from a crosslinguistic perspective. An exploratory corpus-based study. Orientalia Suecana 591. 122–158. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
. 2012. Language-specific meanings in contrast: A corpus-based contrastive study of Swedish ‘get’. In Alexandra Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (guest eds.), The art of getting: Get verbs in European languages from a synchronic and diachronic point of view. Thematic issue of Linguistics 50(6). 1413–1461.Google Scholar
. 2013. Seeing the lexical profile of Swedish through multilingual corpora. The case of Swedish åka and other vehicle verbs. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics. Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 25–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Erk Emeksiz, Zeynep & Julian Rentzsch
2024. Visual perception verbs in Old Anatolian Turkish. Journal of Historical Linguistics DOI logo
van de Weijer, Joost, Ivana Bianchi & Carita Paradis
2024. Sensory modality profiles of antonyms. Language and Cognition 16:1  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Hartman, Jenny & Carita Paradis
2023. The language of sound: events and meaning multitasking of words. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Shuqiong & Yue Ou
2023.  A quantitative study of the polysemy of Mandarin Chinese perception verb kàn ‘look/see’ . Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Poulton, Thomas
2022. Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Przemysław Staniewski: The linguistics of olfaction: Typological and diachronic approaches to synchronic diversity . Linguistic Typology 26:3  pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
SEÇKİN, Kuban
2022. DERLEME SÖZLÜĞÜ’NE GÖRE TÜRKİYE TÜRKÇESİ AĞIZLARINDA “DÜŞÜN-” FİİLİ. Motif Akademi Halk Bilimi Dergisi DOI logo
Backhouse, Anthony E.
2021. How to talk about smell in Japanese. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131],  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Bellamy, Kate
2021. Let me count the ways it stinks. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131],  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz & Przemysław Staniewski
2021. Rendering what the nose perceives. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2021. Smelling over time. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131],  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
CABALLERO, ROSARIO & CARITA PARADIS
2020. Soundscapes in English and Spanish: a corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition 12:4  pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Hellerstedt, Maria & Rea Peltola
2020. Le chemin de l’audible : la structuration dynamique de la perception par les verbes höras (suédois) et kuulua (finnois) « être audible ». Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
PROOS, MARIANN
2020. Feeling your neighbour: an experimental approach to the polysemy oftundma‘to feel’ in Estonian. Language and Cognition 12:2  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Viberg, Åke
2020. Phenomenon-Based Perception Verbs in Swedish from a Typological and Contrastive Perspective. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Viberg, Åke
2021. Why is smell special? A case study of a European language: Swedish. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach-Eicke, Elisabeth
Peltola, Rea
2018. Being perceptible: Animacy, existentiality and intersubjectivity in constructions with the Finnish verbkuulua‘to be perceptible (through hearing)’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Peltola, Rea
2023. Verbalizing animal inner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 217  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.