Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 30:2 (2023) ► pp.159–182

The genre specifics of English wh-exclamatives

ORCID logo | University of Münster
This paper puts forward the hypothesis that wh-exclamatives in Present-day English are much more genre-specific than has previously been acknowledged. To test this, prototypical how- and what-exclamatives are searched for in three different corpora containing material from conceptually oral language, that is prose fiction, personal letters and informal, spontaneous face-to-face conversations. The results show that in terms of token frequency, wh-exclamatives are most frequent in personal letters, a genre which has hitherto not been linked with exclamatives. Furthermore, the outcomes demonstrate that each genre shows a different distribution of exclamatives. In all cases, the different structural realizations (clausal vs. non-clausal form) can be connected to the function the exclamative fulfills in the respective genre and to the general properties of the three distinct text types. The results compel us to consider that exclamatives might be more specialized than has been believed so far.
Keywords: exclamatives, Present-day English, corpus linguistics, genre, discourse, oral language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The syntax and semantics of exclamatives
    • 2.1The syntactic characteristics of wh-exclamatives
    • 2.2Semantic and pragmatic characteristics of wh-exclamatives
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Parameters of orality
    • 3.2Data sources and collection of data
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22013.sch
References (36)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2010. Factivity in exclamatives is a presupposition. Studia Linguistica 64 (1). 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anna, Marina & Martin Pfeiffer. 2021. Die frühkindliche Verwendung des Exklamativformats oh+X: Noticings und Problemmitteilungen. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 221. 1–35.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 2007. Longman grammar of spoken and written English, 7th edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2014. The extremes of insubordination: Exclamatory as if! Journal of English Linguistics 42(2). 93–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNC Consortium. 2007. The British National Corpus, XML Edition. Oxford Text Archive. [URL]
Castroviejo Miró, Elena. 2008. Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 71. 41–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charleston, Britta M. 1960. Studies on the emotional and affective means of expression in Modern English. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Chernilovskaya, Anna, Cleo Condoravi & Sven Lauer. 2012. On the discourse effects of wh- exclamatives. In Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 109–119. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2005. Exclamative clauses in English. Word – Journal of the International Linguistic Association 561. 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Avis, Franz-Josef. 2002. On the interpretation of wh-clauses in exclamative environments. Theoretical Linguistics 281. 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliot, Dale E. 1974. Toward a grammar of exclamations. Foundations of Language 11(2). 231–246.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2). 279–326.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2004. Illocution, mood, and modality. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphologie. Morphology. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. A handbook on inflection and word formation, vol. 21, 1190–1201. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva. 2020. On the status of wh-exclamatives in English. Functions of Language 27(2). 207–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter. 1999. Court records and cartoon reflections of spontaneous dialogue in early Romance texts. In Andreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz & Franz Lebsanft (eds.), Historical Discourse Analysis, 399–429. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 361. 15–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 26(102). 64–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, Noriko. 1973. Boy! Is syntax easy! In Claudia Corum, Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 369–377. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2001. Exclamative constructions. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language universals and language typology. An international handbook, vol. 2/21, 1038–1050. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. & Knud Lambrecht. 1996. The exclamative sentence type in English. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 375–389. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Näf, Anton. 1996. Die w-Exklamativsätze im Deutschen – zugleich ein Plädoyer für eine Rehabilitierung der Empirie in der Sprachwissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 24(2). 135–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, Martin. 2016. The deictic dimension of exclamations: On the use of wh-exclamatives in German face-to-face interaction. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 401. 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 341. 411–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Speech acts distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 11, 155–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schröder, Daniela. 2016. Gutenberg Letter Corpus.Google Scholar
. In preparation. Independent wh-exclamative constructions in the history of English. New York: Routledge.
Siemund, Peter. 2015. Exclamative clauses and their relevance for theories of clause types. Studies in Language 39(3). 697–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 271–285. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas. 2019. Approaching the pragmatics of exclamations experimentally. In Eszter Ronai, Laura Stigliano & Yenan Sun (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 54 (CLS 54), 527–540. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Vialard, Maurice. 1989. Remarques sur les “questions exclamatives” en anglais. L’Information Grammaticale 411. 10–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2021. The grammar of interactional language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Paul Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79 (1). 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, Alexander & Michael Ellsworth. 2016. Exklamativsätze im FrameNet-Konstruktikon am Beispiel des Englischen. In Rita Finkbeiner & Jörg Meibauer (eds.), Satztypen und Konstruktionen, 146–91. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Van Olmen, Daniel
2024. Adjectival intensification in West Germanic. Studies in Language 48:2 ► pp. 436 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.