Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 29:3 (2022) ► pp.274299
Allan, Lorraine G.
1980A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15(3). 147–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, Ben, Amy Bidgood, Katherine E. Twomey, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland & Daniel Freudenthal
2015Preemption versus entrenchment: Towards a construction-general solution to the problem of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. PloS one 10(4). 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland & Chris R. Young
2008The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgments of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition 1061. 87–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnon, Inbal & Neal Snider
2010More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1). 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas M. Bates
2008Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language 59(4). 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily
2013Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bencini, Giulia ML & Adele E. Goldberg
2000The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43(4). 640–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bidgood, Amy, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine & Caroline F. Rowland
2014The retreat from locative overgeneralisation errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgement study. PLOS one 9(5). 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa
1988The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 73–101. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg
2011Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language 87(1). 55–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braine, Martin D. S. & Patricia J. Brooks
1995Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Michael Tomasello & William E. Merriman (eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs, 352–376. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cho, Yongjoon & Moongee Jeon
2015hankwuke swuyongseng phantanuy silhempangpeplon pikyo yenkwu [A comparative study of acceptability judgement collection methods in Korean]. The Journal of Linguistics Science 721. 397–416.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects and the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choo, Miho. & Hye-Young Kwak
2008Using Korean. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2010Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review 27(1). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desagulier, Guillaume
2016A lesson from associative learning: asymmetry and productivity in multiple-slot constructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(2). 173–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
2002Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Fernando Ferreira-Junior
2009Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7(1). 188–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Ute Römer & Matthew Brook O’Donnell
2016Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar (Language Learning Monograph Series). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Enochson, Kelly & Jennifer Culbertson
2015Collecting psycholinguistic response time data using Amazon Mechanical Turk. PloS one 10(3). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1990Construction grammar. Course reader for Linguistics 120A. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2013Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational verb templates. Mind & Language 28(4). 435–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Healy, A., & Miller, G.
(1970) The verb as the main determinant of sentence meaning. Psychonomic Science 201. 372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilbig, Benjamin E.
2016Reaction time effects in lab-versus Web-based research: Experimental evidence. Behavior Research Methods 48(4). 1718–1724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Holger Diessel
2017Entrenchment in construction grammar. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 57–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Matt A. & Adele E. Goldberg
2013Evidence for automatic accessing of constructional meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(10). 1439–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Yuki, Gerry TM Altmann & Sarah L. Haywood
2003The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 491. 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Youngjin
1999The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 141. 687–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyunwoo, Gyu-Ho Shin & Haerim Hwang
2020Integration of verbal and constructional information in the second language processing of English dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42(4). 825–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hung-gyu, Beom-mo Kang & Jungha Hong
200721seyki seycongkyeyhoyk hyentaykwuke kichomalmwungchi sengkwawa cenmang [21st century Sejong modern Korean corpora: Results and expectations]. Proceedings of Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology 311. 311–316.Google Scholar
Kim, Jonathan, Ute Gabriel & Pascal Gygax
2019Testing the effectiveness of the Internet-based instrument PsyToolkit: A comparison between web-based (PsyToolkit) and lab-based (E-Prime 3.0) measurements of response choice and response time in a complex psycholinguistic task. PLoS One 14(9). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lachman, Roy, Juliet Popper Shaffer & Deborah Hennrikus
1974Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(6). 613–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1970Irregularity in syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2017Entrenchment in Cognitive Grammar. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 39–56. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Tova R. Rapoport
1988Lexical Subordination. CLS 24 Part 1 1. 275–289.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ikseop
2011kwukehakkaysel [Introduction to Korean linguistics]. Seoul: Hakyensa.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong-hun
2014Semantic relations and multiple case constructions: An experimental approach. Linguistic Research 31(2). 213–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Soojong, Minjung Kwon, Junsu Kim & Hyunki Kim
2015ExoBrainul wihan hankwuke uymiyek kaitulain mich malmwungchi kwuchwuk [Korean Proposition Bank Guidelines for ExoBrain]. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on human & cognitive language technology, 250–254.Google Scholar
Liu, Ho-Ling, Wan-Ting Liao, Shin-Yi Fang, Tieh-Chi Chu & Li Hai Tan
2004Correlation between temporal response of fMRI and fast reaction time in a language task. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22(4). 451–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jeff
1991Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43(4). 907–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2006Discussion note: Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language 82(4). 850–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Sang-Hee & Eunkyung Yi
2021Perception-production asymmetry for Korean double accusative ditransitives. Linguistic Research 38(1). 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent & Adele E. Goldberg
2017Linguistic generalization on the basis of function and constraints on the basis of statistical preemption. Cognition 1681. 276–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1989Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, Roger
1993Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin 1141. 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robenalt, Clarice & Adele E. Goldberg
2015Judgement evidence for statistical preemption: It is relatively better to vanish than to disappear a rabbit, but a lifeguard can equally well backstroke or swim children to shore. Cognitive Linguistics 26(3). 467–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, Gyu-Ho
2020People also avoid repetition in sentence comprehension: Evidence from multiple postposition constructions in Korean. Linguistics Vanguard 6(1). 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, Gyu-Ho & Hyunwoo Kim
Shin, Jeong-Ah
2008Structural priming in bilingual language processing and second language learning. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PhD thesis.
Shin, Jeong-Ah & Kiel Christianson
2009Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition 112(1). 175–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, Seo-in
2016A study on the functions of eul/reul through examining double accusative constructions: focusing on transitivity. URIMALGEUL: The Korean Language and Literature 681. 1–35.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse
2014Judgement data. In Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho Min
1999The Korean language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Spivey, Michael J. & Michael K. Tanenhaus
1998Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(6). 1521–1543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, John C.
1996The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 35(4). 566–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yong, N., & Lee, M.
(2012) Semantic effects of a pre-verbal argument on the online processing of Korean sentences: An eye-tracking study. Korean Journal of Linguistics 371. 639–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James Hye Sook
2015Double nominative and double accusative constructions. In Lucien Brown & Jaehoon Yeon (eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics, 79–97. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar