Article published In:
The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 1739
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1999On apposition. English Language and Linguistics 3(1). 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13(3). 453–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allegranza, Valerio
2007The signs of determination. Constraint-based modelling across languages. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Amaral, Patricia, Craige Roberts & Allyn Smith
2007Review of “The logic of conventional implicatures” by Chris Potts. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(6). 707–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C. & Ivan A. Sag
(eds.) 2012Sign-based construction grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 131. 391–419.Google Scholar
Delorme, Evelyne & Ray Dougherty
1972Appositive NP constructions: we, the men; we men; I, a man; Etc. Foundations of Language 8(1). 2–29.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Edwin Williams
1987On the definition of word. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles & Collin Baker
2010A frames approach to semantic description. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–339. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. & Ivan A. Sag
1982Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(3). 355–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag
2000Interrogative investigations. The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Harris, Jesse A. & Christopher Potts
2009Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(6). 523–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heringa, Herman
2011Appositional constructions (LOT Dissertation Series 294). Groningen: University of Groningen PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2012A multidominance approach to appositional constructions. Lingua 122(6). 554–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle
1993From discourse to logic. Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2005The discourse function of close appositions. Neophilologus 891. 447–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok
2012Form and function mismatch in the English appositional construction. Language Research 48(3). 1–23.Google Scholar
Loock, Rudy & Kathleen M. O’Connor
2013The discourse functions of nonverbal appositives. Journal of English Linguistics 41(4). 332–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Charles
1987Apposition in English. Journal of English Linguistics 20(1). 101–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Chris
2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 475–501. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffry Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A
2012Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), 69–202.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916Cours de linguistique générale. Genève: Payot.Google Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank
2006NP-internal agreement and the structure of the noun phrase. Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 139–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Predicative constructions. From the Fregean to a Montagovian treatment. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Structural Assemblies and Semantics of the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts,  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.