Article published In:
The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 6083
References
CLMET3.0
The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0 (CLMET3.0). For details, see Diller et al. (2011).
PPCME
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd ed. For details, see Kroch & Taylor (2000).
PPCEME
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. For details, see Kroch et al. (2004).
PPCMBE
Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. For details, see Kroch et al. (2010).
Ackles, Nancy
1997Historical syntax of the English articles in relation to the count/non-count distinction. Seattle, WA: University of Washington PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris
2005Possessive weak definites. In Ji-yung Kim, Yury Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 89–113. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Behrens, Leila
2005Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics 43(2). 275–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhat, D.N. Shankara
1994The adjectival category. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
1998Aspectuality and countability: A cross-categorial analogy. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 37–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1999The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10(3). 203–250.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2008Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 121. 55–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen, Hendrik De Smet & Jukka Tyrkkö
2011A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. The European English Messenger 191. 21–35.Google Scholar
Donner, Morton
1986The gerund in Middle English. English Studies 67(5). 394–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
1980Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Wallace Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Duffley, Patrick
Emonds, Joseph E
1973The derived nominals, gerunds, and participles in Chaucer’s English. In Braj B. Kachru & Robert B. Lees (eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, 185–189. Urbana, Il.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
1996bOn the historical development of English retrospective verbs. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97(1). 71–79.Google Scholar
1998Developments in argument linking in early Modern English gerund phrases. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 87–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006The role of language standardization in the loss of hybrid gerunds in Modern English. In Leiv Egil Breivik, Sandra Halverson & Kari Haugland (eds.), ‘These things write I vnto thee...’: Essays in honour of Bjorg Bækken, 93–110. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
2007Drift and the development of sentential complements in British and American English from 1700 to the present day. In Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso & Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds.), ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’: New insights into Late Modern English, 161–235. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
1992Syntactic change and borrowing: The case of the accusative-and-infinitive construction in English. In Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds.), Internal and external factors in syntactic change, 17–89. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015aWhat it means to verbalize: The changing discourse functions of the English gerund. Journal of English Linguistics 43(1). 36–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonteyn, Lauren, Liesbet Heyvaert & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2015bHow do gerunds conceptualize events? A diachronic study. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4). 583–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1990Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K
1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A
1978Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Helm.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2008On the constructional semantics of gerundive nominalizations. Folia Linguistica 42(1). 39–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1985The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 151–186. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann
1989The English gerund: Syntactic change and discourse function. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 173–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jack, George B
1988The origins of the English gerund. Nowele 121. 15–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1940A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Vol. 51. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2006The origin of English gerundial constructions: A case of French influence?. In Andrew J. Johnston, Ferdinand von Mengden & Stefan Thim (eds.), Language and text: Current perspectives on English and German historical linguistics and philology, 179–195. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor
2000Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of middle English, 2nd ed. [URL].Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Lauren Delfs
2004Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. [URL].Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini & Ariel Diertani
2010Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. [URL].Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 21. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2009Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maekelberghe, Charlotte & Liesbet Heyvaert
Forthcoming. Indefinite nominal gerunds, or the particularization of a reified event. English Studies.
Malchukov, Andrej L
2004Nominalization, verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2006Constraining nominalization: function/form competition. Linguistics 44(5). 973–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mari, Alda, Claire Beyssade & Fabio Del Prete
2013Genericity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Martin, James Robert
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Gary D
2002Nonfinite structures in theory and change. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno Frans
1960A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul Martin
1970On coreferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 439–500.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F
1992The ZPG letter subjects: Definiteness and information status. In Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds.), Discourse description diverse analyses of a fundraising text, 295–325. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V.O
1960Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph S., Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
1991The noun phrase in early sixteenth-century English: A study based on Sir Thomas Moore’s writing. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 50. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1999Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Vol. III, Early Modern English 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976A nontransformational account of gerundive nominals in English. Linguistic Inquiry 7(2). 205–241.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Lotte
2011Old English se from demonstrative to article: A usage-based study of nominal determination and category emergence. Vienna: University of Vienna PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2012Investigating article development in Old English: About categorization, gradualness and constructions. Folia Linguistica Historica 331. 175–213.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Elisabeth Closs Traugott
1998Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Anna Giacolone Ramat & Paul John Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 229–272. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, Matsuji
1999The compound gerund in Early Modern English. In Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe (eds.), The emergence of the modern language sciences: Studies on the transition from historical-comparative to structural linguistics in honour of E. F. K. Koerner, 265–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek
2010The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48(2). 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederick Theodor
1963–1973An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Von Heusinger, Klaus
2002Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Jounral of Semantics 191. 245–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Peter
2005Nominal reference-point constructions: Possessive and esphoric NPs in English. Leuven: University of Leuven PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Wurff, van der Wim
1993Gerunds and their objects in the Modern English period. In Jaap Van Marle (ed.), Historical linguistics 1991, 363–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Fonteyn, Lauren & Liesbet Heyvaert
2018. Chapter 6. Category change in the English gerund. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
He, Qingshun
2020. A Corpus-based Study of Transfers in English Gerunds. In Corpus-based Approaches to Grammar, Media and Health Discourses [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2019. Is there a pluralia tantum subcategory of nominal gerunds? Developing Gaeta's notion of morphological differentiation. Language Sciences 73  pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2018. Present-day English gerunds: A multilayered referential model. Folia Linguistica 52:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
van Praet, Wout
2023. Referential accessibility as an index of the discourse functions of predicative and specificational clauses. Text & Talk 43:1  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.