Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp.179–213

Objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity

Integrating two Cognitive-Functional theories

| Adam Mickiewicz University
Subjectivity and intersubjectivity have long been recognized as central to the understanding of the relations between language, mind and society. They arise in an interactive world for the mind of the individual and shape his/her (inter)personal reality. In present-day linguistics, there are two major approaches to subjectivity. One is associated with Langacker and focuses on cognitive construal. The other framework, which was developed by Traugott, zooms in on diachronic changes on the conceptual level. Naturally, diachronic developments are intimately related to synchronic variation and the conceptual content of an utterance hinges on its presentation and perspectivization. This paper, therefore, argues that, rather than being discrepant and treating distinct phenomena, as is widely suggested (e.g. Brisard 2006; Nuyts 2001, 2012), the two frameworks can be reconciled. By so doing, the ensuing discussion yields an integrated view on objectivity and (inter)subjectivity, a view that will be organized around four main arguments.
Published online: 6 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.2.02kra
References (60)
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie. 2006. Introduction. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.). 2006. Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, Fa: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas & Peter Koch (eds.). 1999. Historical semantics and cognition. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2006. Grammaticalization and subjectification of the English adjectives of general comparison. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), 241–277.Google Scholar
. 2010. English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brisard, Frank. 2006. Logic, subjectivity, and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In Angeliki, Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), 41–74.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 821. 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, Kathleen. 1995. Subjectification and the development of the English perfect. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), 83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish semi-auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2009. Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin. 2013. Nominal reference and the dynamics of discourse: A cognitive-functional approach. In María de los Ángeles, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & Francisco Gonzálvez García (eds.), Form and function in language: Functional, Cognitive and applied perspectives, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). 2013. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Benjamin Fagard. 2011. Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language 181. 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 171. 365–392.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 61. 427–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens. 2007. Introducing cognitive linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 3–21. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectificationpaths followed by the adjectives of completeness. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), 277–314.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems & Freek Van de Velde. 2012. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalizaiton. English Text Construction 51. 128–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: A Functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, Anders R. & Gitte R. Hougaard. 2009. Fused bodies: Sense-making as a phenomenon of interacting, knowledgeable, social bodies. In Hanna Pishwa (ed.), 47–78.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krawczak, Karolina. 2013. Epiphenomenal semantics: Cognition, context and convention. Frankfurt/Main: Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999a. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999b. Losing control: Grammmaticalization, subjectification, and transparency. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), 147–175.Google Scholar
. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 121. 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Deixis and subjectivity. In Frank Brisard (ed.), Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Subjectification, grammaticization and conceptual archetypes. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), 18–40.Google Scholar
. 2007. Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 171–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Grammaticalization and cognitive grammar. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 79–91. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 51. 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2003. Between epistemic modality and degree: The case of really . In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 191–220. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna (ed.). 2009. Social cognition and language. Expression of the social mind. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1990. The principle of intersubjectivity in communication and conversation. Semiotica 801. 121–151.Google Scholar
Stein, Dieter & Susan Wright (eds.). 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651. 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), 31–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), 177–196.Google Scholar
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), 29–71.Google Scholar
. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 51. 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 1995. Subjectification, syntax and communication. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds.). 2008. The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.