Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp.214256
Alexander, Dennis
2006Literal, figurative, metaphorical: A semantic inquiry into the semantic field of game and play in English. Armidale: University of New England PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Juri D
2000Systematic lexicography. (Kevin Windle, Trans.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009The theory of Lexical Functions: An update. In David Beck, Kim Gerdes, Jasmina Milićević & Alain Polguère (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Meaning-Text Theory, 1–14. Montreal: OLST.Google Scholar
Barrios, Rodríguez, María Auxiliadora & Cliff Goddard
Boas, Hans C
2011A frame-semantic approach to syntactic alternations with build-verbs. In Pilar Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English, 207–234. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire
2008Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Donald E
1991Human universals. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Andrej Malchukov
(eds.) 2015Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vols 1 and 21. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Norval Smith
1977Lingua Descriptive Series: Questionnaire. Lingua 421. 1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1991A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2). 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Beryl T.S. Atkins
1992Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbours. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2000Describing polysemy: The case of ‘crawl’. In Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, 91–110. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens
(eds.) 2007The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Gladkova, Anna
2010Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ėmocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki [Russian cultural semantics: Emotions, values, attitudes.] Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
1996Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara to English Dictionary, revised 2nd edn. Alice Springs: Institute for Aboriginal Development.Google Scholar
2003‘Thinking’ across languages and cultures: Six dimensions of variation. Cognitive Linguistics 14 (2/3). 109–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 A piece of cheese, a grain of sand: The semantics of mass nouns and unitizers. In Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Kinds, things and stuff: Mass terms and generics, 132–165. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
2011Semantic analysis: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3). 711–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Verb classes and valency alternations (NSM approach), with special reference to English physical activity verbs. In Bernard Comrie & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, Vol.21, 1671–1702. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2016Semantic molecules and their role in NSM lexical definitions. Cahiers de lexicologie 2016/4 (Special issue on “Lexical definitions”, edited by Alain Polguère & Dorota Sikora).Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Andrea C. Schalley
2010Semantic analysis. In Nitin Indurkhya & Fred J. Damerau (eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2nd edn., 92–120. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka
(eds.) 2002Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, Vols. I and II1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: ‘cutting’ and ‘chopping’ in English, Polish, and Japanese. Language Sciences 311. 60–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014aWords and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages and cultures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014bSemantic fieldwork and lexical universals. Studies in Language 38(1). 80–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka & Jock Wong
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
(eds.) 2013Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Dagmar Divjak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina
2010Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmetter (eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 315–342. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005Argument realization. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levisen, Carsten
2012Cultural semantics and social cognition: A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Masjak, Timur & Ekaterina Rakhilina
(eds.) 2007Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija [Aquamotion verbs: Lexical typology]. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor A
2012Semantics: From meaning to text. Vols 1 and 21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, Paul
2000Put, set, lay, place: A cognitive linguistic approach to verbal meaning. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert
Pustejovsky, James
1995The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013Type theory and lexical decomposition. In James Pustejovsky, Pierrette Bouillon, Hitoshi Isahara, Kyoko Kanzaki & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon theory, 9–38. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
2010Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doran & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R.L. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson & Jan Scheffczyk
2010 FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Available online at [URL].
Sibly, Anne
2008The semantics of physical contact verbs: Lexicographic sketches of caress, fondle, hit, kick, kiss, punch, slap, smack, stroke and touch. Canberra: Australian National University BA Hons thesis.Google Scholar
2010 Harry slapped Hugo, Tracey smacked Ritchie: The semantics of slap and smack . Australian Journal of Linguistics 30(3). 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1967Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1975Why ‘kill’ does not mean ‘cause to die’: The semantics of action sentences. Foundations of Language 13(4). 491–528.Google Scholar
1980Lingua mentalis: The semantics of natural language. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
1996Semantics: Primes and universals. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
2007NSM semantics versus Conceptual Semantics: Goals and standards (a response to Jackendoff). Intercultural Pragmatics 4(4). 521–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009All people eat and drink: Does this mean that ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ are universal human concepts? In John Newman (ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking, 65–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014aImprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014b. “Pain” and “suffering” in cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Language & Culture 1(2). 149–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Yorick
1988Reference and its role in computational models of mental representations. In Umberto Eco, Marco Santambrogio & Patrizia Violi (eds.), Meaning and mental representations, 221–237. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ye, Zhengdao
2010Eating and drinking in Mandarin and Shanghainese: A lexical-conceptual analysis. In Wayne Christensen, Elizabeth Schier & John Sutton (eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science , 375–383. Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.
(ed.) In press The semantics of nouns Oxford OUP
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Ameka, Felix K.
2017. Chapter 14. Meaning between algebra and culture. In Crossroads Semantics,  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Ameka, Felix K. & Deborah Hill
2020. The comparative semantics of verbs of ‘opening’: West Africa vs Oceania. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2017. Ethnopragmatic perspectives on conversational humour, with special reference to Australian English. Language & Communication 55  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2018. “Joking, kidding, teasing”: Slippery categories for cross-cultural comparison but key words for understanding Anglo conversational humor. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:4  pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2018. Minimal English: The Science Behind It. In Minimal English for a Global World,  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2020. Prototypes, polysemy and constructional semantics: The lexicogrammar of the English verb climb. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff & David Lambert
2022. Laughter, bonding and biological evolution. The European Journal of Humour Research 10:2  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff & Kerry Mullan
2020. Explicating verbs for “laughing with other people” in French and English (and why it matters for humour studies) . HUMOR 33:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff, Maite Taboada & Radoslava Trnavac
2019. The semantics of evaluational adjectives. Functions of Language 26:3  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka & Jock Wong
2016. “Walking” and “running” in English and German. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Hill, Deborah
2020. From Expensive English to Minimal English. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Mosel, Ulrike
2020. CUT-verbs of the Oceanic language Teop: A critical study of collecting and analysing data in a language documentation project. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Sadow, Lauren & Kerry Mullan
2020. A Brief Introduction to the Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Vicente, Agustín
2017. What words mean and express: semantics and pragmatics of kind terms and verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 117  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Wierzbicka, Anna & Cliff Goddard
2018. Talking about our Bodies and their Parts in Warlpiri. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Ye, Zhengdao
2019. The Emergence of Expressible Agency and Irony in Today’s China: A Semantic Explanation of the New Bèi-construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.