Cover not available
Article published In:
Stance, resonance and the power of engagement
Edited by Bracha Nir and Elisabeth Zima
[Functions of Language 24:1] 2017
► pp. 16–40

Creative resonance and misalignment stance

Achieving distance in one Hebrew interaction

| University of Massachusetts, Amherst
This paper elaborates on one element of the theory of Dialogic Syntax, Du Bois’ main tool for stance-taking, namely creative resonance. The examples are taken from a recording of a car ride which was part of data collected for the analysis of Hebrew. The focus in the analysis is on misalignment, when participants use stance acts to distance themselves from each other. The main claim of this paper is that whenever a stance act takes place, the relations between the participants are at stake. I show how creative, and to a lesser extent pre-existing, resonance can be used for creating and enhancing distance in misalignment. The discussion connects resonance and Dialogic Syntax with other frameworks for the study of language and interactions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Stance, dialogic resonance and its structural relations
  • 3.The data
  • 4.The central request to go dancing
  • 5.Misalignment via creative dialogic resonance
  • 6.Resonance, Dialogic Syntax and other theories of interaction
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.02dor
References (37)
References
Becker, Alton L. 1982. Beyond translation: Esthetics and language description. In Heidi Byrnes (ed.), GURT 1982: Contemporary perceptions of language: interdisciplinary dimensions, 124–138. Washington D.C., WA: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11(2). 131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Stephen & John Heritage. 2014. Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Paul Drew (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 55–86. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of sociolinguistics 10(5). 569–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24(3). 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2010. ‘You nag so much’: Description of confrontational discourse between two women. Hebrew Linguistics 62–631. 201–230. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
. 2014. Establishing social groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in political radio phone-in programs. In Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou (ed.), Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts, 187–206. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. In prep. Reasons to resonate: Motivating Dialogic Syntax.
Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text and Talk 32(4). 433–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, Gonen & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2006. On the preference for minimization in referring to persons: Evidence from Hebrew conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 38(8). 1305–1312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti. 2006. The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking. Text & Talk 26(3). 281–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. The epistemic engine: sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 681. 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William & David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 2009. Metalanguage in interaction: Israeli-Hebrew discourse markers. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Bracha Nir. 2014. Complementation in linear and Dialogic Syntax: The case of Hebrew divergently aligned discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 523–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. The management of knowledge discrepancies and of epistemic changes in institutional interactions. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 27–57. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nir, Bracha, Gonen Dori-Hacohen & Yael Maschler. 2014. Formulations on Israeli political talk radio: From actions and sequences to stance via dialogic resonance. Discourse Studies 16(4). 534–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreement and disagreement with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In John Heritage & Maxwell J. Atkinson (eds.), Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68(6). 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70(6). 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In David N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 79–106. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
1987. Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 501. 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988a. On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: A single case conjecture. Social problems 35(4). 442–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988b. Description in the social sciences I: Talk-in-interaction. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 21. 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2000. On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1). 715–720.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2003a. On ESP puns. Studies in language and social interaction. In Phillip J. Glenn, Curtin D. LeBaron & Jennifer Mandelbaum (eds), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper, 452–461. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2003b. The surfacing of the suppressed. In Phillip J. Glenn, Curtin D. LeBaron & Jennifer Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper, 204–223. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2013. Sequence organization. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 191–209. Malden, MA: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Makoto Hayashi. 2010. Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society 391. 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Iwasaki, Shoichi
2023. Stancetaking in motion: stance triangle and double dialogicality. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 575 ff. DOI logo
Nir, Bracha, Irit Mayost-Abramovich & Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2021. Balancing institutional authority and children’s agency. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 10:2 DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Johan Frid, Victoria Johansson & Carita Paradis
2021. Challenges of releasing audio material for spoken data: The case of the London-Lund Corpus 2. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
PÕLDVERE, NELE, VICTORIA JOHANSSON & CARITA PARADIS
2021. Resonance in dialogue: the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Shrikant, Natasha
2020. Metadiscourse and the management of relationships during online conflict among academics. Text & Talk 40:4 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Avalos, Xima & Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2019. Criticism, consensus, and fandom: Demonstrated practices from a sports Facebook fan page. Discourse, Context & Media 29 ► pp. 100284 ff. DOI logo
Noy, Chaim & Michal Hamo
2019. Stance-taking and participation framework in museum commenting platforms: On subjects, objects, authors, and principals. Language in Society 48:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.