Patterns of (inter)subjectivity
Asymmetries for Glaswegian peripheral but
The prevalent hypothesis in research on pragmatic markers suggests that the left periphery of an utterance attracts predominantly subjective meanings, whereas the right periphery is the locus of intersubjective meanings. The goal of this paper is to test this hypothesis for but as used in a dataset of spoken Glaswegian English, a variety in which but may occur in both left- and right-peripheral positions. Considering that but derives its discursive meaning not per se, but from its embeddedness in particularized contexts, the methodological framework integrates the notion of (inter)subjectivity with the interactional-sociolinguistic concept of contextualization cue to identify (inter)subjective patterned co-occurrences for but. A fine-grained analysis of the patterns but forms with subjective and intersubjective cues in its local linguistic context shows that discourse patterns of left-peripheral but tend to foreground subjective meanings, while discourse patterns of right-peripheral but tend to foreground more intersubjective meanings, supporting the hypothesis of peripheral asymmetry.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Peripheries and (inter)subjectivity
- 3.(Inter)subjective discourse patterns
- 4.PM but in Glaswegian English
- 5.(Inter)subjective patterns of Glaswegian but
- 5.1Procedure
- 5.2Results
- 5.3Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (69)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Aitken, Adam J. 1979. Scottish speech: A historical view, with special reference to the Standard English of Scotland. In Adam J. Aitken & Tom McArthur (eds.), Languages of Scotland, 85–118. Edinburgh: Chambers.
Altenberg, Bengt. 1986. Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds.), English in speech and writing: A symposium (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 60), 13–40. Uppsala: Academiae Ubsaliensis.
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
Beeching, Kate. 2009. Procatalepsis and the etymology of hedging and boosting particles. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 81–105. Bingley: Emerald.
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges (eds.). 2014. Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Brill: Leiden.
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistíque générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson. 2000. Concessive patterns in conversation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton.
Degand, Liesbeth. 2014.
So very fast very fast then: Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds.), 151–178.
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit. 2011.
Moi, je ne sais pas. Je ne sais pas, moi: French tonic pronouns in the left vs. right periphery. Paper presented at IPra, Manchester. (July, 2011.)
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, 21 vols.. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
El Zarka, Dina. 2013. Egyptian Arabic independent pronouns in the left and right periphery: Reference point and repair constructions with subjective and intersubjective meanings. Paper presented at IPra, New Delhi. (September, 2013.)
Fischer, Kerstin & Maria Alm. 2013. A radical construction grammar perspective on the modal particle-discourse particle distinction. In Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles: categorization and description, 47–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fritz, Clemens W. A. 2007. From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CUP.
Gumperz, John J. 1992. Contextualization and understanding. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 229–252. Cambridge: CUP.
Haselow, Alexander. 2012. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language and Communication 32(3). 182–204.
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 375–424.
Jucker, Andreas H. & Yael Ziv. 1998. Introduction. In Andreas H. Jucker & Jael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory, 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2009. English comment clauses: Position, prosody, and scope. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34(1). 49–75.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tanja Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4). 852–897.
Koivisto, Aino. 2012. Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics 44(10). 1254–1272.
Krug, Manfred G. 2015. Maltese English. In Edgar Schneider, Daniel Schreier, Peter Trudgill & Jeffrey P. Williams (eds.), Further studies in the lesser-known varieties of English, 11–50. Cambridge: CUP.
Lenk, Uta. 1998. Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30(2). 245–257.
López-Couso, María José. 2010. Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–164. Berlin: Mouton.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Macmillan.
Moore, Bruce. 2008. Speaking our language: The story of Australian English. South Melbourne, Vic.: OUP.
Mulder, Jean & Sandra A. Thompson. 2006. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Keith Allen (ed.), Selected Papers from the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. [URL].
Mulder, Jean, Sandra A. Thompson & Cara Penry Williams. 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English, 337–358. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Norrick, Neal R. 2001. Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 33(6). 849–878.
Norrick, Neal R. 2009. Conjunctions in final position in everyday talk. In Bruce Fraser, Ken Turner & Jacob Mey (eds.), Language in life and a life in language: Jacob Mey – a festschrift, 319–328. Bingley: Emerald.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 383–400.
Palmer, John F. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Pichler, Heike. 2013a. Discourse function and clause periphery, innit?
Paper presented at IPra, New Delhi. (September, 2013.)
Polanyi, Livia & Remko Scha. 1983. On the recursive structure of discourse. In Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), On connectedness in sentence, discourse and text: Proceedings of the Tilburg conference held on 25 and 26 January 1982, 141–178. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Ian Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP.
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2011–2014. Fine phonetic variation and sound change: A real-time study of Glaswegian. Research grant RPG-142 funded by the Leverhulme Trust. [URL].
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4). 283–311.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–142. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–74. Berlin: Mouton.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van der Wouden, Ton & Ad Foolen. 2011. Dutch particles in the right periphery. [URL]. (April 16, 2013.)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2022.
American and Irish English speakers’ perceptions of the final particles so and but.
World Englishes 41:2
► pp. 207 ff.
Cuenca, Maria Josep
2020.
Defective Connective Constructions: Some Cases in Catalan and Spanish.
Corpus Pragmatics 4:4
► pp. 423 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.