Cover not available
Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 13:1 (2015) ► pp.65–86

Mapping Translation Studies in Korea Using the Holmes Map of Translation Studies

| Hankuk University of Foreign Studies |
Keywords: Holmes map, translation studies in Korea, empirical science, mapping, non-empirical research
Published online: 1 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.13.1.04lee
References (18)
References
Baker, M. (1996). Linguistic and cultural studies: Complementary or competing paradigms in Translation Studies?. In: Angelika Lauer, Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, Johann Haller and Erich Steiner (eds.) Übersetzungswissenschaft im Umbruch: Festschrift fur Wolfram Wilss zum 70. Geburstag. Tübingen, Gunter narr. p. 9–19.Google Scholar
Brownlie, S. (2003). Distinguishing some approaches to translation research: The issue of interpretative constraints. The Translator. 9 (1), p. 39–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, A. (1998). Causes, translations, effects. Target. 10(2), p. 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). What constitutes “progress” in Translation Studies?” In: Birgitta Englund Dimitrova (ed.) Översättning och tolkning. Rapport från ASLA:shöstsymposium, Stockholm, 5-6 november 1998. Uppsala, ASLA, p. 33–49.Google Scholar
Cherterman, A. & Arrojo, R. (2000). Shared ground in Translation Studies. Target. 12(1), p. 151–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doorslaer, L. V. (2007). Risking conceptual maps. In: Gambier, Y. & Doorslaer, L. V. (eds.) The Metalanguage of translation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins, p. 27–43.Google Scholar
Gile, D. (2001). Being constructive about shared ground. Target. 13(1), p. 149–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gile, D., Gambier, Y. & Doorslaer, L. V. (eds.) (2012). Handbook of Translation Studies.volume 31. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hermans, T. (1999). Translation in systems: Descriptive and system-oriented approaches explained. Manchester, Saint Jerome.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2002). Crosscultural transgressions: Research models in Translation Studies II: Historical and ideological issues. Manchester, Saint Jerome.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. S. (1988). Translated!: Papers on literary translation and Translation studies. Amsterdam, Rodopi.Google Scholar
Mossop, B. (2001). Why should we seek common ground? Target. 13(1), p. 158–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pym, A. (1998). Method in translation history. Manchester, Saint Jerome.Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. (2006). The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, L. (1995). The Translatorʼs invisibility. London, Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. & Chesterman, A. (2002). The Map: A beginner's guide to doing research in Translation Studies. Manchester, Saint Jerome.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lee, Hyang & Won Jun Nam
2019. The past and future of translation studies in South Korea. Perspectives 27:3 ► pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Yanfei & Huijuan Ma
2019. Mapping translation studies in China based on Holmes/Toury Map. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 17:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.