Cover not available
Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 14:2 (2016) ► pp.173–193

Strategy use in English-to-Chinese simultaneous interpreting

A descriptive-exploratory study

 | Southwest University
 | Macquarie University
The study reported here attempts to describe and explore possible patterns of strategy use in English-to-Chinese simultaneous interpreting (SI) of fast-delivery and accented speeches, drawing upon a subset of empirical data generated from a larger experimental study (see Han & Riazi 2016). A paralleled text analysis of source speeches and transcripts of interpretations indicates that the interpreters developed a deep repertoire of interpreting strategies, but utilized strategies of syntactic transformation and of substitution most frequently across different speeches. They also employed strategy clusters, a sequential combination of strategies, to cope with complex source-text segments. In addition, the speech rate affected the use of the two prominent strategies (i.e., syntactic transformation and substitution) considerably, whereas the accent did not. These results are explained and their implications for interpreter training are also discussed.
Keywords: accent, fast speech rate, interpreting strategy, simultaneous interpreting, strategy use
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Defining, identifying and categorizing interpreting strategies
    • 2.2The effect of source-text characteristics on strategy use
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Data source
    • 4.2Strategy coding
    • 4.3English glosses for the target language interpretations
    • 4.4Samples selected for the analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Strategy use: illustrated examples
    • 5.2Patterns of strategy use
    • 5.3Strategy clusters
    • 5.4Effect of speech rate and accent on strategy use
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.14.2.01han
References (30)
References
Al-Salman, Saleh, and Al-Khanji, Raja’i. 2002. “The native language factor in simultaneous interpretation in an Arabic/English context.” Meta 47 (4): 607–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena. 2006. “Strategies of simultaneous interpreting and directionality.” Interpreting 8 (2): 149–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Chia-chien. 2005. Directionality in Chinese/English simultaneous interpreting: Impact on performance and strategy use. PhD diss. University of Texas at Austin, USA.Google Scholar
Donato, Valentina. 2003. “Strategies adopted by student interpreters in SI: A comparison between the English-Italian and the German-Italian languagepairs.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 121: 101–134.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Simon, Herbert A. 1980. “Verbal reports as data.” Psychological Review 87 (3): 215–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 1995. Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Chao. 2016a. Investigating score dependability in English/Chinese interpreter certification performance testing: A generalizability theory approach. Language Assessment Quarterly 13 (3): 186–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. (Report). A survey to profile conference interpreting practice in China. Interpreting 18 (2): 253–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Chao & Riazi, Mehdi. 2016. Investigating the effects of speech rate and accent on simultaneous interpretation: A mixed-methods approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Ivanova, Adelina. 2000. “The use of retrospection in research on simultaneous interpreting.” In Tapping and Mapping the Processes of Translation and Interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research, ed. by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit and Riitta Jääskeläinen, 27–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Roderick. 1998. Conference Interpreting Explained. 2nd ed. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Kalina, Sylvia. 2000. “Interpreting competences as a basis and a goal for teaching.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 101: 3–32.Google Scholar
Kim, Hye-Rim. 2005. “Linguistic characteristics and interpretation strategy based on EVS analysis of Korean-Chinese, Korean-Japanese interpretation.” Meta 50 (4): 1492–1421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, Hella. 1976/2002. “Simultaneous interpreting: Interdependence of variables in the interpreting process, interpreting models and interpreting strategies.” In Interpreting Studies Reader, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker, and Mariam Shlesinger, 110–119. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kohn, Kurt, and Kalina, Sylvia. 1996. “The strategic dimension of interpreting.” Meta 41 (1): 118–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiangdong. 2013. “Are interpreting strategies teachable? Correlating trainees’ strategy use with trainers’ training in the consecutive interpreting classroom.” Interpreters’ Newsletter 181: 105–128.Google Scholar
Liontou, Konstantina. 2011. “Strategies in German-to-Greek simultaneous interpreting: A corpus-based approach.” Gramma 191: 37–56.Google Scholar
Meuleman, Chris, and Van Besien, Fred. 2009. “Coping with extreme speech conditions in simultaneous interpreting.” Interpreting 11 (1): 20–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina. 2004. “Interpreting omissions: A new perspective.” Interpreting 6 (2): 117–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petite, Christelle. 2005. “Evidence of repair mechanisms in simultaneous interpreting.” Interpreting 7 (1): 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riccardi, Alessandra. 1998. “Interpreting strategies and creativity”. In Translators’ Strategies and Creativity, ed. by A. Beylard-Ozeroff, J. Králová, and B. Moser-Mercer, 171–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “On the evolution of interpreting strategies in simultaneous interpreting.” Meta 50 (2): 753–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setton, Robin. 1999. Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive and Pragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlesinger, Mariam. 2000. “Interpreting as a cognitive process.” In Tapping and mapping the processes of Translation and Interpreting: Outlooks on empirical research, ed. by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit and Riitta Jääskeläinen, 3–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Besien, Fred. 1999. “Anticipation in simultaneous interpretation.” Meta 44 (2): 250–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandepitte, Sonia. 2001. “Anticipation in conference interpreting: A cognitive process.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 141: 323–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vik-Tuovinen, Gun-Viol. 2002. “Retrospection as a method of studying the process of simultaneous interpreting.” In Interpreting in the 21st Century: Challenges and opportunities, ed. by Giuliana Garzone, and Maurizio Viezzi, 63–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhuang, Minglian. 1991. “汉英同声传译的技巧. [Techniques in Chinese-English simultaneous interpreting].” Chinese Translators Journal 21: 24–27.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Su, Wei
2021. Rubric-Based Self-Assessment of Chinese-English Interpreting. In Testing and Assessment of Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.