Cover not available
Article published In:
FORUM
Vol. 14:2 (2016) ► pp.194–210

Self-monitoring processes in simultaneous interpreting

| University of Szeged, Hungary
| Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary

In psycholinguistics there is an agreement that self-monitoring is part of the speech production system, it serves the repair of speech errors and disfluencies occurring during the process of speech production.

During simultaneous interpreting, where source language speech perception and target language speech production happen simultaneously, the analysis of self-monitoring is of particular importance.

In our study we compare self-monitoring processes in the target language texts, interpreted from English into Hungarian, of professional interpreters and trainee interpreters.

We examine the frequency of incidence of error – type disfluencies, the editing phase of self-repairs, the frequency of incidence of disfluencies, and the editing phases of repetitions and restarts.

Although our data have revealed considerable individual differences between interpreters, some tendencies can be detected. In general, differences can be detected in self-monitoring between professional and trainee interpreters. When compared to data about self-monitoring processes in spontaneous, monolingual Hungarian speech, we can state that there were far fewer phenomena connected to self-monitoring in the target language output of simultaneous interpreters than in monolingual Hungarian texts.

Keywords: disfluencies, repair mechanisms, self-monitoring, simultaneous interpreting, speech production
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Pauses and hesitations
    • 3.2Repetitions
    • 3.3Restarts
    • 3.4Error-type disfluencies
    • 3.5Content analysis of the TL texts
  • 4.Discussion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.14.2.02bak
References
Bakti, Mária and Bóna, Judit
2014 “The Effect of Source Language Disfluencies on the Target Language Output of Simultaneous Interpreters.” In Papers in Language Acquisition, Language Learning and Speech Research. Studies in Psycholinguistics 41., ed. by Bátyi Szilvia, Navracsics Judit and Vígh-Szabó Melinda, 121–129. Budapest-Veszprém: Gondolat Kiadó-Pannon Egyetem MFTK.Google Scholar
Bóna, Judit
2011 “Disfluencies in the Spontaneous Speech of Various Age Groups: Data from Hungarian.” Govor 28(2): 95–115.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert and Wasow, Thomas
1998 “Repeating Words in Spontaneous Speech.” Cognitive Psychology 371: 201–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
G. Láng, Zsuzsa
2002 Tolmácsolás felsőfokon: a hivatásos tolmácsok képzéséről. Budapest: Scholastica.Google Scholar
Gerver, David
1976 “Empirical Studies of Simultaneous Interpretation: A Review and a Model.” In Translation. Application and Research, ed. by Richard W. Brislin, 165–207. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel
1995 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gósy, Mária
2005 Pszicholingvisztika. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
2007 “Disfluencies and Self-monitoring.” Govor 261: 91–110.Google Scholar
Gyarmathy, Dorottya
2009 “A beszélő bizonytalanságának jelzései: ismétlések és újraindítások.” In Beszédkutatás 2009., ed. by Gósy Mária, 196–216. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M.
1989 Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, Sieb
2005 “Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech.” Speech Communication 471: 43–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petite, Christelle
2005 “Evidence of repair mechanisms in simultaneous interpreting: A corpus-based analysis.” Interpreting 7(1): 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz
1995 “Slips and Shifts in Simultaneous Interpreting.” In Topics in Interpreting Research, ed. by Jorma Tommola, 73–90. Turku: The University of Turku, Centre for Translation and Interpreting.Google Scholar
Postma, Albert
2000 “Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.” Cognition 771: 97–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postma, Albert and Kolk, Herman
1993 “The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 391: 472–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Setton, Robin
1999 Simultaneous Interpretation. A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
1979 “Speech Errors as Evidence for a Serial-Ordering Mechanism in Sentence Production.” In Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, ed. by William Cooper and Edward Walker, 295–342. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Spiller-Bosatra, Edith and Daró, Valeria
1992 “Delayed Auditory Feedback Effects on Simultaneous Interpreters.” The Interpreters’s Newsletter 41: 8–14.Google Scholar
Van Besien, Fred and Meuleman, Chris
2004 “Dealing with Speakers’ Errors and Speakers’ Repairs in Simultaneous Interpretation.” The Translator 10 (1): 59–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Magnifico, Cédric & Bart Defrancq
2019. Self-repair as a norm-related strategy in simultaneous interpreting and its implications for gendered approaches to interpreting. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 31:3 ► pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Shen, Mingxia & Junying Liang
2021. Self-repair in consecutive interpreting: similarities and differences between professional interpreters and student interpreters. Perspectives 29:5 ► pp. 761 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.