Cover not available
Part of
Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage
Edited by Augusto Soares da Silva
[Figurative Thought and Language 11] 2021
► pp. 1–16

Introduction
Figurative language

Intersubjectivity and usage

| Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Article outline
  • 1.Figurative language, intersubjectivity and usage
  • 2.Social and empirical turn in figurativity research
  • 3.Overview of the sections and contributions
    • 3.1Part one. Intersubjectivity and interaction
    • 3.2Part two. Mechanisms and processes
    • 3.3Part three. Usage and variation
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.int
References (53)
References
Allan, K. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy. A diachronic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, E. (2008a). El lenguaje como cultura. Una crítica del discurso sobre el lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
(2008b). Collective cognition and individual activity: Variation, language and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 137–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Brône, G., & Oben, B. (Eds.) (2018). Eye-tracking in interaction. Studies on the role of eye gaze in dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J. (2007). Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5 , 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2019). Eye-tracking and the role of context in figurative understanding. Paper presented as part of the Theme session on Eye-tracking for figurative language research: methods, best practices & challenges at the 7th Specialised RaAM seminar, University of Liège, Belgium, 16–17th May 2019.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (177–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Vera, J. E. (Ed.) (2015). Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures. Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse? In Soares da Silva, A., Martins, C., Magalhães, L., & Gonçalves, M. (Eds.), Comunicação, cognição e media (pp. 41–60). Braga: Axioma, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2016). The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 527–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor, & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the construal of the world (pp. 153–180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (Eds.) (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48 (8), 529–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Pres. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D. (2018). Usage-based cognitive models: Behavioural profiles and quantifying context effects on conceptual metaphors. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Figurative Thought and Language, Braga, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 23–26 October.
Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.) (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gola, E., & Ervas, F. (Eds.) (2016). Metaphor and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy. The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1 (3), 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). A usage-based model. In R. W. Langacker. Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar (pp. 261–288). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (Eds.) (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rakova, M. (2002). The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay? Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (3), 215–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). The extent of the literal. Metaphor, polysemy, and theories of concepts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2017). Advances in cultural linguistics. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2015). Grammar and cooperative communication. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 232–252). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winters, M. E., Tissari, H., & Allan, K. (Eds.) (2010). Historical Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.) (2008). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar