Aitchison, J. (1987). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Akhundov, M. D. (1986). Conceptions of space and time: Sources, evolution, direction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allan, K. (1995). The anthropocentricity of the English word(s) back
. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 11–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alverson, H. (1994). Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time, in English, Mandarin, Hindi and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arstila, V., & Loyd, D. (2014). Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atkins, S., Clear, J., & Ostler, N. (1992). Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 7, 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bachelard, G. (1936/1993). La dialectique de la durée. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bachelard, G. (1932/1994). L’ intuition de l’ instant. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barcelona, A. (1995). Metaphorical models of romantic love in Romeo and Juliet
. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 667–688. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barnett, J. E. (1998). Time’s pendulum: The quest to capture time – from sundials to atomic clocks, the fascinating history of timekeeping and how our discoveries changed the world. New York: Plenum Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balslev, A. N. (1986). Reflections on time in Indian philosophy. In J. T. Fraser, N. Lawrence, & F. C. Haber (Eds.)., Time, science and society in China and the West: The study of time V (pp. 104–112). Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergson, H. (1960). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphor: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, M. (1979). More on metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Block, R. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., & Garrett, M. F. (Eds.) (1996). Language and space. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandt, P. A. (2004a). Spaces, domains and meaning: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandt, P. A. (2004b). Metaphors and meaning in Shakespeare’s sonnet 73. In G. Bradshaw, T. Bishop, & M. Turner (Eds.), The Shakespearean international yearbook 4: Shakespeare studies today (pp. 123–131). Aldershot: Ashgate.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brône, G., & Vandaele, J. (Eds.) (2009). Cognitive Poetics: Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, P. (2012). Time and space in Tzeltal: Is the future uphill?. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–11.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, M. (2004). Cognitive Stylistics in the classroom: A pedagogical account. Style, 39(1), 491–510.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, M. (2010). Why care about Pedagogical Stylistics?. Language and Literature, 19(1), 7–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burke, M. (2011). Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L. (2011). Metaphor in prosaic and poetic creativity. In J. Swann, R. Pope, & R. Carter (Eds.), Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp. 68–82). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell, S. (1990). Circadian rhythms and human temporal experience. In R. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, R. (1999). Common language: Corpus, creativity and cognition. Language and Literature, 8(3), 195–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D. (2005). Perceptual foundations of abstract thought (Doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58(1), 63–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D. (2016). Temporal language and temporal thinking may not go hand in hand. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time (pp. 169–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, Green J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, S., Santiago-Diaz, I., Fotokopoulou, O., Pitta, R., & Gil, D. (2004). How deep effects are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek and Spanish. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child’s mind: Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34, 387–405. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gesture in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(4), 643–674. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cavafy, J. (2003). C. P. Cavafy. Sixty-three poems translated by J. C. Cavafy. Athens: Ikaros.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 27–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, A. (2010). Shakespearean neuroplay: Reinvigorating the study of dramatic texts and performance through Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooperrider, K., Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2014). The conceptualization of time in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body-language-communication (Vol. 2, pp. 1781–1788). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, S. (1996). The Menendez brothers virus: Analogical mapping in blended spaces. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 67–81). Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, S. (2006). Conceptual blending in thought, rhetoric, and ideology. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: current applications and future perspectives (pp. 187–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in Cognitive Semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1510–1536. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, S., & Pagán Cánovas, C. (2013). Understanding timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integration. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 198–219.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Ø. (1995).
When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19, 197–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dancygier, B. (2012). The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deignan, A. (1999). Linguistic metaphors and collocation in non-literary corpus data. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 19–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deignan, A. (2008). Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Desagulier, G. (2005). A cognitive model of variation and language change based on an examination of some emerging constructions in contemporary English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Bordeaux 3, Bordeaux.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Draaisma, D. (2004). Why life speeds up as you get older: How memory shapes our past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Droit-Volet, S., & Gil, S. (2009). The time-emotion paradox. Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 364, 1943–1953. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Droit-Volet, S., & Meck, W. H. (2007). How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 504–513. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1993). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durkheim, E. (1912/1915). The elementary forms of the religious life. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elias, N. (1993). Time: An essay (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emmorey, K. (2001). Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 148–174). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1999). Space and time. In J. Allwood, & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Cognitive Semantics: Meaning and cognition (pp. 131–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, V. (2004b). How we conceptualise time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Essays in Arts and Sciences, 33(2), 13–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, V. (2005). The meaning of time: Polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 33–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, V. (2013). Language and time: A Cognitive Linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, V., & Chilton, P. (Eds.) (2010). Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G. (2005). Compression and emergent structure. Language and Linguistics, 6(4), 523–538.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G. (2009). Generalized integration networks. In V. Evans, & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 147–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (1996). Spaces, worlds, and grammars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1994). Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD: Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. [Available at [URL] and at [URL]]
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113–130). Stanford: CSLI Publications/![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, T. (1998). Principles of conceptual integration. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 269–283). Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1999). Metonymy and conceptual integration. In K. U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 77–90). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 283–304.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Polysemy and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, V. Herman, Z. Todd, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 79–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filipović, L., & Jaszczolt, K. (Eds.) (2012a). Space and time in languages and cultures: Linguistic diversity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Filipović, L., & Jaszczolt, K. (Eds.) (2012b). Space and time in languages and cultures: Language, culture, and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen, H. Thompson, G. Thurgood, K. Whistler, & J. Wright (Eds.), Proceeedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1977). Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 76–138). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1978). On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In D. Frakas, W. M. Jacobsen, M. Weslay, & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon (pp. 148–173). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flaherty, M. (1999). A watched pot. New York: New York University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleischman, S. (1982). The future in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flowerdew, L. (2005). An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 321–332. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fludernik, M. (Ed.) (2011). Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fong, V. (1998). Space and time in the semantics of the Finnish case system. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 17–28). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forceville, C. (2001). Blends and metaphors in multimodal representations. Paper presented at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of California at Santa Barbara.
Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. New York: Harper and Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, D. C. (1993).
According to my bond: King Lear and re-cognition. Language and Literature, 2, 1–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, D. C. (1998).
Catch[ing] the nearest way: Macbeth and cognitive metaphor. In J. Culpeper, M. Short, & P. Verdonk (Eds.), Exploring the language of drama: From text to context (pp. 96–111). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, D. C. (1999).
The Rack Dislimns: Schema and rhetorical pattern in Antony and Cleopatra
. Poetics Today, 20, 443–460.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, M. H. (1995). Metaphor making meaning: Dickinson’s conceptual universe. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 643–666. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, M. H. (1997). Grounded spaces: Deictic-self anaphors in the poetry of Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature, 6, 7–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, M. H. (2000). Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a theory of Cognitive Poetics. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 253–281). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, M. H. (2002). Cognitive mapping in literary analysis. Style, 36, 466–483.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, M. H. (2005). The poem as complex blend: conceptual mappings of metaphor in Sylvia Plath’s The Applicant
. Language and Literature, 14(1), 25–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freeman, M. H. (2007). Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies: State of the art in Cognitive Poetics. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1175–1202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedman, W. J. (1990). About time: Inventing the fourth dimension. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Galton, A. (2011). Time flies but space does not: Limits to the spatialization of time. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 695–703. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavins, J., & Steen, G. (Eds.) (2003). Cognitive Poetics in practice. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D. (1989). Prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics, 27, 587–612. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D. (1997). Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geissler, H. G., Schebera, F. U., & Kompass, R. (1999). Ultra-precise quantal timing: Evidence from simultaneity thresholds in long-range apparent movement. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 707–726. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gell, A. (1992). The anthropology of time. Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D., & Imai, M. (1992). Is the future always ahead? Evidence for system mappings in understanding space-time metaphors. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 510–515.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: evidence for two systems in processing space-time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 537–565. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Georgakopoulos, T. (2011). Γνωσιακή προσέγγιση της σημασιολογικής αλλαγής των προθέσεων της ελληνικής: Η περίπτωσης της ‘εἰς’. [A cognitive approach to the semantic change of prepositions in Greek: The case of ‘eis’] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Georgakopoulos, T., & Piata, A. (2012). The meaning of khrónos in Ancient Greek. Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings 1, 342–360 (available at [URL]).
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 347–358.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R., & Bogdanovich, J. (1999). Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 14, 37–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., & Colston, H. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21, 379–403. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, J. (1966). The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception. Journal of Psychology, 62, 141–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, J. (1975). Events are perceivable but time is not. In J. T. Fraser, & N. Lawrence (Eds.), The study of time (Vol. 2, pp. 295–301). New York: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goguen, J. (1999). An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for metaphor, analogy, and agents (pp. 242–291). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goutsos, D. (2003). Σώμα ελληνικών κειμένων: Σχεδιασμός και υλοποίηση [The corpus of Greek texts: Design and application]. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Conceptual blending and metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guyau, J. M. (1890/1988). The origin of the idea of time. In J. A. Michon (Ed.), Guyau and the idea of time (pp. 37–148). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamilton, C. (1996). Mapping the mind and the body: On W. H. Auden’s personifications. Style, 36, 408–427.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, P., & Giora, R. (2011). Metaphor and figurative language (Vols. 1–6). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haralambopoulou, K. (2010). A principled polysemy approach as an alternative to the conceptual metaphor theory for the study of time in Greek (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich: Lincom Europa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time: From the Bing Bang to black holes. London: Bantam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (trans. by J. Stambaugh). New York: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiraga, M. K. (1998). Metaphor-icon link in poetic texts: A cognitive approach to iconicity. Journal of the University of the Air, 16, 95–123.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiraga, M. K. (1999). Blending and an interpretation of haiku: A cognitive approach. Poetics Today, 20, 461–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiraga, M. K. (2005). Metaphor and iconicity: A cognitive approach to analyzing texts. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Husserl. (1928/1999). Phenomenology of internal time consciousness. In D. Welton (Ed.), The essential Husserl. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors in conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Indefrey, P., & Gullberg, M. (2008). Time to speak: Cognitive and neural prerequisites for time in language. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Isham, C. J., & Savvidou, K. N. (2002). Time and modern physics. In K. Ridderbos (Ed.), Time (based on the 2000 Darwin Lectures) (pp. 6–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R. (1987). Poetry of grammar and grammar of poetry. In K. Pomorska, & S. Rudy (Eds.), Language and Literature (pp. 121–144). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R., & Waugh, L. R. (1979). The sound shape of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1–2). New York: Dover.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janda, L. (2002). Concepts of case and time in Slavic. Glossos, 3, 1–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaszczolt, K. M. (2009). Representing time: An essay on temporality as modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kant, I. (1838). Critique of pure reason (F. Haywood, Trans.). London: William Pickering.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemmerer, D., (2005). The spatial and temporal meanings of English prepositions can be independently impaired. Neuropsychologia, 43, 797–806. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiang, M. (2005). Conceptual blending theory and psychiatry. Cognitive Science Online, 3(1), 13–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, H. E. M. (1987). The future precedes the past: Time in Toba. Word, 38, 173–185. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, V. (2002).
A shotgun wedding: Co-occurrence of war and marriage metaphors in mergers and acquisitions discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 179–204. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövesces, Ζ. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövesces, Ζ. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kranjec, A. (2006). Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kyriacou, C. P. (2002). The genetics of time. In K. Ridderdos (Ed.), The Darwin college lectures: Time (pp. 65–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1996).
Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 91–123). Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vols. 1–2). Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Virtual reality. Studies in Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. London/New York: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levine, R. (1997). A geography of time: The temporal misadventures of a social psychologist, or how a culture keeps time just a little bit differently. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Exploration in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (2006). Grammars of space. Exploration in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liddell, S. K. (1998). Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(3), 283–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lucas, J. R. (2002). Time and religion. In K. Ridderdos (Ed.), The Darwin college lectures: Time (pp. 143–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ludlow, P. (1999). Semantics, tense, and time: An essay in the metaphysics of natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacDonald, J. (1999). Inuit time. In K. Lippincott, U. Eco, & E. H. Gombrich (Eds.), The story of time (pp. 92–95). London: Merell Holberton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malinowski, B. (1927). Lunar and seasonal calendari in the Trobriands. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 57, 203–15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandelblit, N. (1997). Grammatical blending: Creative and schematic aspects in sentence processing and translation (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandelblit, N. (2000). The grammatical marking of conceptual integration: From syntax to morphology. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 197–252.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marmaridou, S. (2006). On the conceptual, cultural and discursive motivations of Greek pain lexicalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 393–434. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marmaridou, S. (2008). Γνωσιακή προσέγγιση στη σημασιολογική ανάλυση του χρόνου στα νέα ελληνικά [A cognitive approach to the semantic analysis of time in Modern Greek]. In A. Moser, A. Mpakakou, H. Haralambakis, & D. Heila-Markopoulou (Eds.), Γλώσσης χάριν. Τόμος αφιερωμένος από τον τομέα γλωσσολογίας στον καθηγητή Γεώργιο Μπαμπινιώτη [Linguae gratia. A volume dedicated to Prof. Georgios Bampiniotis by the department of linguistics] (pp. 57–70). Athens: Ellinika Grammata.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matlock, T. (2001). How real is fictive motion? (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Cruz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Y. (1996a). How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In A. Goldberg (Ed.). Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 359–374). Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Y. (1996b). Subjective motion and English and Japanese Verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 138–226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McTaggart, E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 17, 457–474. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mendelsohn, D. (2012). C. P. Cavafy. Complete poems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London/New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michon, J. A. (1990). Impicit and explicit representations of time. In R. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Minkowski, E. (1970). Lived time: Phenomenological and psychopathological studies. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore, K. E. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore, K. E. (2011). Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 759–776. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moser, A. (1994). Ποιόν και απόψεις του ρήματος [Verbal aspect and aktionsart]. Athens: Parousia Monograph Series.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mukarovský, J. (1932/1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. Garvin (Ed.), Prague school reader in aesthetics, literary structure and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 93–123. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nänny, M., & Fischer, O. (Eds.), (2003). Iconicity in language and literature (Vols. 1–4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikiforidou, K. (2005). Conceptual blending and the interpretation of relatives: A case study of Greek. Cognitive Linguistics, 161, 169–206.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R. (1999). Could the future taste purple?. In R. Núñez, & W. Freeman (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention, and emotion (pp. 41–60). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R. (2008). Conceptual metaphor, human cognition, and the nature of mathematics. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 339–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R., Cooperrider, K., Doan, D., & Wassmann, J. (2012). Contours of time: Topographic construals of past, present, and future in the Yupno valley of Papua Nea Guinea. Cognition, 124(1), 25–35. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R., Motz, B., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the Ego- and Time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the cross-linguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oakley, T. (1998). Conceptual blending, narrative discourse, and rhetoric. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 321–360. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 175–196.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ochs, E. (1979). Introduction: What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 1–17). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ohmann, R. (1971). Speech acts and the definition of literature. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 4, 1–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ornstein, R. (1969/1997). On the experience of time. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Özçaliskan, S. (2002). Metaphors we move by: A crosslinguistic-developmental analysis of metaphorical motion events in English and Turkish (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagán Cánovas, C. (2010). Erotic emissions in Greek Poetry: A generic integration network. Cognitive Semiotics, 6, 7–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagán Cánovas, C. (2011). The genesis of the arrows of love: Diachronic conceptual integration in Greek mythology. The American Journal of Philology, 132(4), 553–579. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagán Cánovas, C. (2012). Conceptual templates and context: Metaphor, conceptual integration, and relevance. Invited talk at the workshop “Meaning and context”, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris.
Pagán Cánovas, C., & Jensen, M. (2013). Anchoring time-space mappings and their emotions: The timeline blend in poetic metaphors. Language and Literature, 22(1), 45–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parker, J. A., Crawford, M., & Harris, P. (Eds.) (2006). Time and memory. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pascual, E. (2002). Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT 68.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pederson, E., Levinson, S., Danziger, E., Kita, S., Wilkins, D., & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petterson, A. (1990). A theory of literary discourse in aesthetics. Lund: Lund University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pereira, F. C. (2007). Creativity and artificial intelligence: A conceptual blending approach. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piata, A., & Pagán Cánovas, C. (2017).
Powerful rhyme and sluttish time: A cross-linguistic study of time personification in poetic discourse. Language and Literature, 26(1), 18–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pöppel, E. (1978). Time perception. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 8, pp. 713–729). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pöppel, E. (1997). A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 56–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (1987). Culture and cognition. In D. Holland, & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G. (2006). The metaphor time as space across languages. In E. Górska, & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy – metaphor collage (pp. 99–120). Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G. (2011). Spatial time in the West and the East. In M. Brdar, M. Omazic, V. P. Takac, T. Gradecak-Erdeljic, & G. Buljan (Eds.), Space and time in language (pp. 1–40). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raju, C. K. (2003). The eleven pictures of time: The physics, philosophy and politics of time beliefs. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robert, A. (1998). Blending in the interpretation of mathematical proofs. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 337–350). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Τ. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192–233. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. (1978). Principle of categorization. In Ε. Rosch, & Β. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 27–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandra, D., & Rice, S. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or the language user’s?. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89–130. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santa Ana, O. (1999).
Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in U.S. public discourse. Discourse and Society, 10, 191–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right”. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 512–516. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santiago, J., Román, A., Ouellet, M., Rodríguez, N., & Pérez-Azor, P. (2008). In Hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research, 74(1), 59–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sattig, T. (2006). The language and reality of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, H. J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 83–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E. (1995). Schema theory and the analysis of text worlds in poetry. Language and Literature, 4(2), 79–108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E. (1997). Language and world creation in poems and other texts. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E. (2006). Blending and characters’ mental functioning in Virginia Woolf’s Lappin and Lapinova
. Language and Literature, 15(1), 55–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E. (2011). Metaphor, creativity, and the experience of pain across genres. In J. Swann, R. Pope, & R. Carter (Eds.) Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp. 83–102). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus Stylistics. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semino, E., & Steen, G. (2008). Metaphor in literature. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 232–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinha, C., Sinha, V. S. da, Zinken, J., & Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shinohara, K. (1999). Epistemology of space and time: An analysis of conceptual metaphor in English and Japanese. Nishinomiya, Japan: Kwansei Gakuin University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sifianou, M. (1992). The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 155–173. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. TEXTUS, 9(1), 75–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. (2005). Corpus and text-basic principles. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing linguistic corpora: A guide to good practice (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxbow Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slife, B. D. (1993). Time and psychological explanation. New York: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smart, J. J. C. (1949). The river of time. Mind, 58, 483–494. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. Gibbs, (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. J. (1994). Understanding metaphor in literature. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G. (1999). Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth’s I wandered lonely as a cloud
. Poetics Today, 20, 499–522.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svalund, J. (2007). Metaphor and convention. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 47–89.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swann, J., Pope, R., & Carter, R. (Eds.) (2011). Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, E. (1999). Compositionality and blending: Semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In T. Janssen, & G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology (pp. 129–162). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, E. (2000). Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 305–334.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweetser, E. (2006). Whose rhyme is whose reason? Sound and sense in Cyrano de Bergerac
. Language and Literature, 15(1), 29–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Vols. 1–2). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, J. (1987). Tense and metaphorizations of time in Zulu. In W. Lörscher, & R. Schulze (Eds.), Perspectives on language in performance. Studies in linguistics, literary criticism, and language teaching and learning (pp. 214–229). Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, J. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tenbrink, T. (2011). Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 704–722. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tendahl, M. (2009). A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive Linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tobin, V. (2006). Ways of reading Sherlock Holmes: The entrenchment of discourse blends. Language and Literature, 15(1), 73–90. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C. (1975). Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica, 15(3), 207–230. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg, (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 3, pp. 369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsur, R. (1992). Toward a theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsur, R. (1998). Poetic rhythm – structure and performance: An empirical study in cognitive poetics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsur, R. (2002). Aspects of Cognitive Poetics. In E. Semino, & J. Culpeper (Eds.), Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis (pp. 279–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsur, R. (2003). On the shore of nothingness: A study in Cognitive Poetics. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsur, R. (2008). Comparing approaches to versification style in Cyrano de Bergerac
. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(2), 146–168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turetzky, P. (1998). Time. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (1987). Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (1996). Conceptual blending and counterfactual argument in the social and behavioral sciences. In P. Tetlock, & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics (pp. 291–295). Princeton: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (1998). The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (2001). Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (2008). Frame blending. In R. Favretti (Ed.), Frames, corpora, and knowledge representation (pp. 13–32). Bologna: Bononia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1998). Conceptual integration in counterfactuals. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 285–296). Stanford: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2000). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metonymy and metaphor at the crossroads (pp. 133–145). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veale, T. (1999). Pragmatic forces in metaphor use: The mechanics of blend recruitment in visual metaphors. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for metaphor, analogy, and agents (pp. 37–51). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A. (1989). Prototypes in semantics and pragmatics: Explicating attitudinal meanings in terms of prototypes. Linguistics, 27, 731–769. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A. (1990).
Prototypes save: On the uses and abuses of the notion of ‘prototype” in linguistics and related fields. In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization (pp. 347–367). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, R. (2004). Making meaning from a clock: Material artifacts and conceptual blending in time-telling instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D. (2011). Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 177–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind and Language, 21(3), 404–433. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wynne, M. (2005). Stylistics: Corpus approaches. In The Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [Available online [URL]].
Zbikowski, L. (2001). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zinken, J. (2009). Temporal frames of reference. In V. Evans, & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space. The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)