Drawing attention to metaphor
An introduction to the debate
Article outline
- 1.By means of context
- 2.Definitions: Metaphor, “deliberateness” and “attention-drawing”
- 3.The theory and the debate(s)
- 4.Methods
- 5.The role of non-textual modes
- 6.The antiquity debate: Are we second-guessing ancient authors?
- 7.The role of genre
- 8.Summing up
-
Notes
-
References
References (35)
References
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate
metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in
US-American college
lectures. metaphorik.de, 20, 39–60.
Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalising
‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic
research. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching
and applying
metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L. & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining
large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in
spoken discourse. Metaphor and
Symbol, 18(3), 149–60.
Cienki, A. (2013). Conceptual
metaphor theory in light of research on speakers’
gestures. Journal of Cognitive
Semiotics, 5(1–2), 349–366.
Collins, R. (2008). The
power of images in
Paul. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.
Di Biase-Dyson, C. (2019, May). Metaphor in Ancient Egyptian medical texts. Some case studies – and a red herring, Paper presented at the RaAM Specialized Seminar: Metaphor Studies at the Intersection of Multiple Disciplines, Liège, Belgium.
Gibbs, R. W. (2015a). Does
deliberate metaphor theory have a
future? Journal of
Pragmatics, 90, 73–76.
Gibbs, R. W. (2015b). Do
pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test
of deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of
Pragmatics, 90, 77–87.
Goatly, A. (2011). The
language of metaphors (2nd
ed.). London: Routledge.
Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor
in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures,
communicative functions and cognitive
representations (Dissertation Vrije
Universiteit
Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor
in newspapers (Dissertation
Vrije Universiteit
Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The
contemporary theory of
metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor
and
thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors
we live
by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy
in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western
thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More
than cool reason: A field guide to poetic
metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, C. (2008a). Metaphors
dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A dynamic
view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, Ch., Krennmayr, T., Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP:
A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language
use. Corpus
Pragmatics, 2, 129–147.
Reijnierse, W. G. (2017). The
value of deliberate
metaphor (Dissertation Vrije
Universiteit
Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.
Ricœur, P. (1975). Biblical
hermeneutics. Semeia, 4, 29–148.
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Jane Demmen, Veronika Koller, Sheila Payne, Andrew Hardie, Paul Rayson (2017). The
online use of violence and journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as
compared with health professionals: a mixed methods
study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative
Care, 1, 60–66.
Shen, Y. & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical
(in)coherence in discourse. Discourse
Processes 28(2), 139–154.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The
paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of
metaphor. Metaphor and
Symbol, 23, 213–241.
Steen, G. J. (2011a). From
three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate
metaphor. metaphorik.de, 21, 83–110.
Steen, G. J. (2015). Developing,
testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor
Theory. Journal of
Pragmatics, 90, 67–72.
Steen, G. J. (2017). Attention
to metaphor: Where embodied cognition and social interaction can meet, but
may not often do
so. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor:
Embodied cognition and
discourse (pp. 279–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A
Method for Linguistic Metaphor
Identification (Converging Evidence in Language and
Communication Research
14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Turner, M. (1990). Aspects
of the invariance hypothesis. Cognitive
Linguistics, 1–2, 247–255.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Dalpanagioti, Thomai
2023.
Developing productive metaphoric competence through a frame-inspired task-based teaching model.
Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :43(4)
► pp. 33 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.