Part of
Drawing Attention to Metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities
Edited by Camilla Di Biase-Dyson and Markus Egg
[Figurative Thought and Language 5] 2020
► pp. 114
References (35)
References
Beger, A. (2011). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. metaphorik.de, 20, 39–60.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2013). Conceptual metaphor theory in light of research on speakers’ gestures. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 349–366.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (2008). The power of images in Paul. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Cuccio, V. (2018). Attention to metaphor: from neurons to representations (Metaphor in Language, Cognition and Communication 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase-Dyson, C. (2019, May). Metaphor in Ancient Egyptian medical texts. Some case studies – and a red herring, Paper presented at the RaAM Specialized Seminar: Metaphor Studies at the Intersection of Multiple Disciplines, Liège, Belgium.
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015a). Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future? Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b). Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test of deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 77–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A. (2011). The language of metaphors (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in newspapers (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2008a). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2011). Are ‘deliberate metaphors’ really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 61–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, Ch., Krennmayr, T., Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G. (2017). The value of deliberate metaphor (Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Utrecht: LOT.
Ricœur, P. (1975). Biblical hermeneutics. Semeia, 4, 29–148.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Jane Demmen, Veronika Koller, Sheila Payne, Andrew Hardie, Paul Rayson (2017). The online use of violence and journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 1, 60–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y. & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical (in)coherence in discourse. Discourse Processes 28(2), 139–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J. (2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research (Converging evidence in language and communication research 10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. metaphorik.de, 21, 83–110.Google Scholar
(2011b). What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Attention to metaphor: Where embodied cognition and social interaction can meet, but may not often do so. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 279–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1985). ‘Conventional’ and ‘dead’ metaphors revisited. In W. Paprotte & R. Dirven (Eds.), The ubiquity of metaphor (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 29), (pp. 17–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. (1990). Aspects of the invariance hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 1–2, 247–255.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dalpanagioti, Thomai
2023. Developing productive metaphoric competence through a frame-inspired task-based teaching model. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :43(4)  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.