Cover not available
Part of
Why Gesture?: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating
Edited by Ruth Breckinridge Church, Martha W. Alibali and Spencer D. Kelly
[Gesture Studies 7] 2017
► pp. 317–329

Chapter 14
The function of gesture in mathematical and scientific discourse in the classroom

 | Bridgewater State University
In science and math domains that are highly abstract and complex gestures produced by both teachers and students play an important role in constructing meaning for students. Gesture facilitates the communication of newly forming, abstract ideas and in turn, enables students and teachers to engage in a discourse that will eventually lead the student to a higher level of mathematical and scientific knowledge. I will address two main functions of gesture in mathematical and scientific discourse: (1) Through imagery, gesture makes abstract concepts and phenomena concrete and perceptible, (2) Through teacher-student and peer-peer interactions in the classroom, gesture is used in the co-construction of shared representations. Future directions and implications will also be discussed.
Article outline
  • Gestures make abstract concepts and phenomena concrete
    • Student’s gestures
    • Teacher’s gestures
  • Gestures help co-construct shared representations
    • Teacher-student interactions
    • Peer interactions
  • Practical implications and future work
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7.15sin
References (45)
References
Alibali, Martha W., Andrew G.Young, Noelle M. Crooks, Amelia Yeo, Matthew S. Wolfgram, Iasmine M. Ledesma, Mitchell J. Nathan, R. Breckinridge Church, Suyeon Kim, & Eric J. Knuth 2013. “Students learn more when their teacher has learned to gesture effectively.” Gesture 13(2): 210–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Lucia M. Flevares & Susan Goldin-Meadow 1997. “Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand?” Journal of Educational Psychology 23: 183–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibali, Martha W. & Mitchell J. Nathan 2007. “Teacher’s gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson.” In Video Research in the Learning Sciences, R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. J. Barron & S. Derry (eds), 349–365. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Mitchell J. Nathan, R. Breckinridge Church, Matthew S. Wolfgram, Suyeon Kim, & Eric J. Knuth 2013. “Teachers’ gestures and speech in mathematics lessons: Forging common ground by resolving trouble spots.” ZDM Mathematics Education 45: 425–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibali, Martha W., Robert C. Spencer, Lucy Knox, & Sotaro Kita 2011. “Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem-solving.” Psychological Science, XX (X): 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blöte, Anke W., Eeke Van der Burg, & Anton S. Klein 2001. “Students’ flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems instruction effects.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 627–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, R. Breckinridge, & Susan Goldin-Meadow 1986. “The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge.” Cognition 23: 43–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2005. “Coordinating with each other in a material world.” Discourse Studies 7: 507–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowder, Elaine M. 1996. “Gestures at work in sense-making science talk.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 5 (3): 173–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowder, Elaine M., & Denis Newman 1993. “Telling what they know: The role of gestures and language in children's science explanations.” Pragmatics & Cognition 1: 339–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enyedy, Noel 2003. “Knowledge construction and the collective practice: At the intersection of learning, talk, and social configurations in a computer-mediated mathematics classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (3): 361–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (4): 427–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flevarez, Lucia & Perry, Michelle 2001. “How Many Do You See? The use of nonspoken representations in first-grade mathematics lessons.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 330–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerofksy, Susan 2010. “Mathematical learning and gesture: Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in student’s gestured graphs of functions.” Gesture 10 (2–3): 321–343.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, San Kim, & Melissa A. Singer 1999. “What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 720–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, & Melissa A. Singer 2003. “From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in teaching and learning.” Developmental Psychology 39: 501–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Debra Wein, & Cecelia Chang 1992. “Assessing knowledge through gesture: Using children’s hands to read their minds.” Cognition & Instruction 9: 201–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles 1986. “Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation.” Semiotica 62: 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, James & Diane Wearne 1993. “Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic.” American Educational Research Journal 30: 393–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, Autumn, Martha Alibali, & Sotaro Kita 2006. “I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands.” Language and Cognitive Processes 21: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam 1996. “Some reasons for studying gesture.” Semiotica 62(1–2): 3–28.Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro 2000. “How representational gestures help us think.”In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 152–185. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Seokmin, Barbara Tversky, & John Black 2015. “Coordinating gesture, word, and diagram: Explanations for experts and novices.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 15: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschman, Timothy & Curtis LaBaron 2002. “Student articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture.” Cognition and Instruction 20 (2): 249–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampert, Magdalene 1986. “Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication.” Cognition and instruction 3, no. 4: 305–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. “When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.” American Educational Research Journal 27: 29–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Maréchal, Jean-François, & Dupont, Celine 2003. The Questioning Gesture in Relation to Levels of Knowledge: Case of Chemistry Laboratory work. Radovljica ESERA summer school-2002, submitted.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay 1999. “Meaning-making in the conversation: Head-spinning, heart winning, and everything in between.” Human Development 42: 87–91.Google Scholar
2003. “Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word.” In Educational Perspectives on Mathematics as Semiotics: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing, M. Anderson, A. Saenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, and V. Cifarelli (eds), 215–234. Ottawa: Legas Publishing.Google Scholar
M´arquez, Conxita, Merc`e Izquierdo, & Mariona Espinet 2006. “Multimodal science teachers’ discourse in modeling the water cycle.” Science Education 90: 202–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCrone, Sharon S. 2005. “The development of mathematical discussions: An investigation in a fifth-grade classroom.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 7 (2): 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, Michelle 1991. “Learning and transfer: Instructional conditions and conceptual change.” Cognitive Development 6: 449–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, Michelle, Church, Ruth Breckinridge, & Goldin-Meadow, Susan 1988. “Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts.” Cognitive Development 3: 359–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Fiona J. & Robert A. Reeve 2002. “Gesture in collaborative mathematics problem-solving.” Journal of Mathematical Behavior 20: 447–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael & Daniel Lawless 2002. “Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts.” Learning and Instruction 12: 285–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael 2001. “Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning.” Review of Educational Research 71: 365–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael & Manuela Welzel 2001. “From activity to gestures and scientific language.” Journal of Research and Science Teaching 38: 103–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, Wolff-Michael 2003. “From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: The bridging function of gestures.” Pragmatics and Cognition 11: 141–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. “Gesture-speech phenomena, learning, and development.” Educational Psychologist 38 (4): 249–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singer, Melissa 2004. “Gesture-speech mismatches during instruction: Handing out more information.” Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 65 (6-B), 3203–Google Scholar
Singer, Melissa & Susan Goldin-Meadow 2005. “Children learn when their teacher’s speech and gesture differ.” Psychological Science 16 (2): 85–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singer, Melissa, Josh Radinsky, & Susan Goldman 2008. “The role of gesture in meaning construction.” Discourse Processes 45 (4–5): 365–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stigler, Jim W., & James Hiebert 1999. “Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instructions: An overview of the TIMSS video study.” Phi Delta Kappan 79: 14–21.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Zhang, Zhenzhen, Wendy L. Bowcher & Bingjun Yang
2024. Toward a system of gesture–speech relations in elementary science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching DOI logo
Tu, Xintian, Joshua Danish, Megan Humburg, Mengxi Zhou, Nitasha Mathayas, Noel Enyedy & Tessaly Jen
2023. Understanding young children’s science learning through embodied communication within an MR environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 18:2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Rau, Martina A. & Miranda Zahn
2022. Nonverbal Collaboration on Perceptual Learning Activities with Chemistry Visualizations. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13356], ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Rau, Martina A., Miranda Zahn, Edward Misback, Tiffany Herder & Judith Burstyn
2021. Adaptive support for representational competencies during technology-based problem solving in chemistry. Journal of the Learning Sciences 30:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Papandreou, Maria & Stefanos Yiallouros
2020. Highlighting the features of whole-class interactions in a participatory early childhood environment. Early Child Development and Care 190:4 ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.