Part of
New Directions in Cognitive LinguisticsEdited by Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel
[Human Cognitive Processing 24] 2009
► pp. 161–181
Edited by Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel
[Human Cognitive Processing 24] 2009
► pp. 161–181
Genitives and proper names in constructional blends
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Kang, Ji-in & Iksoo Kwon
2024. The COVID-19 pandemic and changing meanings of flatten the curve
. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 505 ff. 
Golubeva, Tatiana
2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political
discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Yue, Ming & Yi Zhang
2023. Semantic Integration in It-Clefts: A Multifactorial Exploration of Agreement Variability in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4 ► pp. 375 ff.
Dancygier, Barbara
2022. Experiential viewpoint, simile and dynamicity in discourse. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 205 ff.
van Dongen, Noah, Matteo Colombo, Felipe Romero & Jan Sprenger
2021. Intuitions About the Reference of Proper Names: a Meta-Analysis. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12:4 ► pp. 745 ff.
Fontaine, Lise
2020. A textual perspective on referential metonymy. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :70 ► pp. 199 ff.
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.