Part of
Metonymy in Language and ThoughtEdited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 91–120
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 91–120
Distinguishing Metonymy from Synecdoche
Cited by (43)
Cited by 43 other publications
Geçitli, Erkan & Bünyamin Yurdakul
2025. Teaching Programming Through Metaphors. In Effective Computer Science Education in K-12 Classrooms [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 319 ff. 
Muszytowska, Dorota
2024. Metaphtonymy of ἀστέρες πλανῆται in the Epistle of Jude 13 in the Light of the First Book of Enoch. The Biblical Annals 14:3 ► pp. 481 ff.
Tur, Cristina
Kim, Yeseul
2023. Cumulative Part-Whole Relations as a Verbal and Visual Rhetorical Strategy: Song of Songs 7 and Composite Beings of the Southern Levant. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 48:2 ► pp. 154 ff.
Law, James
2023. Regularity of semantic change in Romance anatomical terms. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13:2 ► pp. 295 ff.
Tsakuwa, Mustapha Bala, Xu Wen & Ibrahim Lamido
2023. A chained metonymic approach toίdὸ‘eye’ constructional metonymies in Hausa. Cognitive Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Zhang, Cun & Zhengjun Lin
2023. Metaphor analysis of the COVID-19 public health emergency on Chinese national news media. Pragmatics and Society 14:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
Dai, Xin
2022. Estudio cognitivo e intercultural del eufemismo chino y español de muerte. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 449 ff.
Dehouve, Danièle
2022. Los tropos conceptuales en los códices adivinatorios del Centro de México. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 52:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Peña Cervel, Ma Sandra
2022. For Better, for Worse, for Richer, for Poorer, in Sickness and in Health: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Merism. Metaphor and Symbol 37:3 ► pp. 229 ff.
Apresjan, Valentina, Anastasiya Lopukhina & Maria Zarifyan
2021. Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Li, Ke & Shukang Li
2021. Towards A Better Understanding of Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol 36:3 ► pp. 146 ff.
Szymańska, Monika
2021. Grammatical metonymy and construal operations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 465 ff.
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2020. Figures of speech revisited. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 225 ff.
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2024. On The Gradability of Metaphor. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 69:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 266 ff.
Devylder, Simon
2019. Mereology in the flesh. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 199 ff.
Golovko, Nikolay, S. Cindori, O. Larouk, E.Yu. Malushko, L.N. Rebrina & N.L. Shamne
2019. Is a metonymy always a metonymy? A speculation on taxonomical aspects of propositional metonymy and situational metonymy. SHS Web of Conferences 69 ► pp. 00044 ff.
Ioannou, Georgios
2019. Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kolesnyk, Oleksandr
2019. The cognitive premises of myth-oriented semiosis. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives :19
Kowalewski, Hubert
Stampoulidis, Georgios, Marianna Bolognesi & Jordan Zlatev
2019. A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics 12:1
Denroche, Charles
Cho, Hye-Jin
2017. A Study on the Cognitive Structure and the Extension of Meaning of Spanish Phraseological Units of BOCA. Iberoamérica 19:2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Jassal, Aftab S.
2017. Making God Present: Place-Making and Ritual Healing in North India. International Journal of Hindu Studies 21:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos
2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
SUZUKI, KOHEI
2017. <i>Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Pinto, Jonathan
2016. ‘Wow! That’s so cool!’ The Icehotel as organizational trope. Human Relations 69:4 ► pp. 891 ff.
Smith, Chris
2012. Double whammy! The dysphemistic euphemism implied in unVables such as u. Lexis :7
Velasco, Olga Isabel Díez
2012. Review of Benczes, Barcelona & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (2011): Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 227 ff.
Kostina, Irina
2011. Classification of Conceptual Variation of Terms Based on the Semantic Discursive Modulation. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 16:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
Rundblad, Gabriella & Dagmara Annaz
2010. Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28:3 ► pp. 547 ff.
Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol
2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Rydning, Antin Fougner
2005. Le défi du procédé synecdoquien en traduction. Meta 49:4 ► pp. 856 ff.
WEISS, DAVID
2005. Metonymy in Black and White: Shelby Steele's Revelatory Racial Tropes. Howard Journal of Communications 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2003. Speaking With Forked Tongue: A Comparative Study of Metaphor and Metonymy in English and Malay Phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol 18:4 ► pp. 289 ff.
Fisher, Harwood
2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147
Koch, Peter
2001. Bedeutungswandel und Bezeichnungswandel. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 31:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide & Brigitte Nerlich
2000. Metáfora y Conocimiento. Metaphor and Symbol 15:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.