Part of
Metonymy in Language and Thought
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden
[Human Cognitive Processing 4] 1999
► pp. 333
Cited by

Cited by 50 other publications

Antloga, Špela
2023. Identifikacija metafore in metonimije v jezikovnih korpusih. Slovenščina 2.0: empirical applied and interdisciplinary research 11:1  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2007. Review of Günter, Köpcke, Berg & Siemund (2007): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2017. Chapter 3. How to do things with metonymy in discourse. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. Chapter 5. How metonymy and grammar interact. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Tanja Gradečak
2022.  Rosie the Riveter of the COVID time. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1  pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Daler Zayniev
2024. Chapter 2. Metonymic layers in proverbs. In Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 16],  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2021. Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn
2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2  pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Cifuentes-Férez, Paula
DeCoursey, Christina A. & Aliaa N. Hamad
2019. Emotions across the essay: What second-language writers feel across four weeks’ writing a research essay. English Studies at NBU 5:1  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
DESAGULIER, GUILLAUME & PHILIPPE MONNERET
2023. Cognitive Linguistics and a Usage‐Based Approach to the Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics,  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Fisher, Harwood
2003. Metonymy as concept: A metaphor for rhetoric, not for thought. Semiotica 2003:147 DOI logo
Guarddon-Anelo, María del Carmen
2011. The Role of Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammaticalization: The Expression of Aspect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Guerrero Medina, Pilar
2020. Meaning construction and motivation in the English benefactive double object construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Kochman-Haładyj, Bożena & Robert Kiełtyka
2023. Paradigm Shift in the Representation of Women in Anglo-American Paremiology – A Cognitive Semantics Perspective. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 68:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Law, James
2019. Diachronic frame analysis. Constructions and Frames 11:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Law, James
2022. Metonymy and argument alternations in French communication frames. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
LECLERCQ, BENOÎT & ILSE DEPRAETERE
2022. Making meaning withbe able to: modality and actualisation. English Language and Linguistics 26:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4)  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2016. How to encode and infer linguistic actions. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:2  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
2005. Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda Thornburg
1998. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30:6  pp. 755 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1  pp. 168 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2018. Chapter 5. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Paradis, Carita
2004. Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19:4  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Paszenda, Joanna
2017. Chapter 8. Motivation behind the extended senses of the Polish ditransitive construction. In Constructing Families of Constructions [Human Cognitive Processing, 58],  pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Yi
2019. The Event-Domain Cognitive Model perspective on terminology: A case study of atmospheric environment terms. Lexicography 6:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Peña Cervel, María Sandra
2016. Argument structure and implicational constructions at the crossroads. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2  pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Lorena Pérez Hernández
2011. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, Developments and Challenges. Metaphor and Symbol 26:3  pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2019.  But, you see, the problem is … Perception verbs in courtroom talk: Focus on you see . Topics in Linguistics 20:1  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Tóth, Máté
2024. A case for metonymic synesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1  pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol
2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona & Maciej Witek
2009. The many faces of speech act theory — editorial to special issue on speech actions. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Guocai
2016. A Cognitive Approach to the Event Structures of Wh-dialogic Constructions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 34:4  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
2015. Cross-linguistic variation in metonymies for PERSON. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Ziegeler, Debra
2016. Intersubjectivity and the diachronic development of counterfactual almost . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
ŞEHİTOĞLU, Muammer
2023. Yabancılara Türkçe Öğretiminde Dinleme Eğitiminde Kullanılan Kitapçık Metinlerinde Çok Anlamlılık: Yedi İklim B1-B2. Korkut Ata Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :11  pp. 837 ff. DOI logo
孙, 姣姣
2022. A New Interpretation of the Phenomenon of Syntactic-Semantic Mismatches in Chinese. Modern Linguistics 10:01  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2007. Book reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 4:3 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.