Part of
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
Edited by Dylan Glynn and Justyna A. Robinson
[Human Cognitive Processing 43] 2014
► pp. 443485
Agresti, A
(2002)  Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A
2006Frequency considerations in morphology. Finnish verbs differ, too. SKY Journal of Linguistics , 19, 175–189.Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H
(2008)  Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.1. Retrieved from [URL].
Benzécri, J.P
(1992)  Correspondence analysis handbook . New York:Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, J., & Mair, P
(2009a) Simple and canonical correspondence analysis using the R package anacor. Journal of Statistical Software , 31, 1–18. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
(2009b) Gifi methods for optimal scaling in R: The package homals. Journal of Statistical Software , 31, 1–20. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Delaere, I., Plevoets, K., & De Sutter, G
(Submitted) Measuring text type variation through profile-based correspondence analysis: How far apart are translated and non-translated Dutch? Target . International Journal of Translation Studies .Google Scholar
Divjak, D
(2010)  Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dray, S., & Dufour, A.-B
(2007) The ade4 package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software , 22, 1–20.Google Scholar
Gifi, A
(1990)  Nonlinear multivariate analysis . Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Glynn, D., & Sjölin, M
(2011) Cognitive Linguistic methods for literature: A usage-based approach to metanarrative and metalepsis. In A. Kwiatkowska (Ed.), Texts and minds: Papers in cognitive poetics and rhetoric (pp. 85–102). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Glynn, D
(2009) Polysemy, syntax, and variation: A usage-based method for Cognitive Semantics. In V. Evans, & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 77–106). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Synonymy, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions: A study in usage-based Cognitive Semantics. In H.-J. Schmid, & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage-patterns: Empirical studies (pp. 89–118). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a) The conceptual profile of the lexeme home: A multifactorial diachronic analysis. In J.E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures (pp. 265–293). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2014b) The social nature of anger: Multivariate corpus evidence for context effects upon conceptual structure. In I. Novakova, P. Blumenthal, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Emotions in discourse (pp. 69–82). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(In press) Cognitive socio-semantics: The theoretical and analytical role of context in meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics .Google Scholar
Gower, J., Gardner-Lubbe, S., & le Roux, N
(2010)  Understanding biplots . Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J
(Eds.) (2006)  Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods . London: Chapman & Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, M., & Nenadić, O
(2010) ca: Simple, multiple and joint correspondence analysis. R package version 0.33. Retrieved from [URL].
Greenacre, M
(1984)  Theory and applications of correspondence analysis . London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2006) From simple to multiple correspondence analysis. InM. Greenacre, & J. Blasius(Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 41–76). London: Chapman & Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007)  Correspondence analysis in practice . London: Chapman & Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010)  Biplots in practice . Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Husson, F., Lê, S., & Pagès, J
(2011)  Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R . 
London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, T., Pleszczynska, E., & Ruland, F
(Eds.) (2004)  Grade models and methods for data analysis . München: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krawczak, K
(2014a) Shame and its near-synonyms in English: A multivariate corpus-driven approach to social emotions. In I. Novakova, P. Blumenthal, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Emotions in discourse (pp. 84–94). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2014b) Epistemic stance predicates in English: A quantitative corpus-driven study of subjectivity. In D. Glynn, & M. Sjölin (Eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity: Corpus, discourse, and literary approaches to stance (pp. 355–386). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Krawczak, K., & Glynn, D
(2011) Context and cognition: A corpus-driven approach to parenthetical uses of mental predicates. In K. Kosecki, & J. Badio (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 87–99). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krawczak, K., & Kokorniak, I
(2012) Subjective construal of think in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics , 48, 439–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H
(2005)  Geometric data analysis: From correspondence analysis to structured data analysis . London: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010)  Multiple correspondence analysis . London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lê, S., & Husson, F
(2008) FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software , 25, 1–18.Google Scholar
Murtagh, F
(2005)  Correspondence analysis and data coding with R and Java . London: Chapman & Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nenadić, O., & Greenacre, M
(2007) Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software , 20. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Henry, M., Stevens, H., & Wagner, H
(2011) vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 1.17-11. Retrieved from [URL].
Oksanen, J
(2006) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. Retrieved from [URL].
Pardo, C
(2010) ‘pamctdp’. Retrieved from [URL].
Plevoets, K., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D
(2008) The distribution of T/V pronouns in Netherlandic and Belgian Dutch. In K. Schneider, & A. Baron (Eds.), Variational pragmatics: Regional varieties in pluricentric languages (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rencher, A
(2002)  Methods of multivariate analysis (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, K
(2009)  Going-to-V and gonna-V in child language: A quantitative approach to constructional development. Cognitive Linguistics , 20, 509–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speelman, D., Grondelaers, S., & Geeraerts, D
(2003) Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities , 37, 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szelid, V., & Geeraerts, D
(2008) Usage-based dialectology: Emotion concepts in the Southern Csango dialect. Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 6, 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venables, W., & Ripley, B
(2002)  Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weller, S., & Romney, K
(1990)  Metric scaling correspondence analysis . London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 60 other publications

Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
Beaupoil-Hourdel, Pauline & Aliyah Morgenstern
2021. French and British children’s shrugs. Gesture 20:2  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Béchet, Christophe & Lieselotte Brems
2023. From complex prepositions to complex subordinators: challenging generalizations. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 55:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Campana, Ilaria, Ivan Farace, Miriam Paraboschi & Antonella Arcangeli
2023. Analysis of environmental, social, and anthropogenic factors as potential drivers of breaching behavior in the Mediterranean fin whale. Marine Mammal Science 39:3  pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Qiaoyun
2022. English and Chinese existential constructions in contrast: A corpus-based semantic study. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58:4  pp. 717 ff. DOI logo
Clarke, Isobelle
2018. Stylistic Variation in Twitter Trolling. In Online Harassment [Human–Computer Interaction Series, ],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Dahlgren, Sonja, Alek Keersmaekers & Joanne Stolk
2022. Language contact in historical documents: the identification and co-occurrence of Egyptian transfer features in Greek documentary papyri. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:2  pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Dattner, Elitzur
2015. Enabling and allowing in Hebrew. In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167],  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Debras, Camille
2017. The shrug. Gesture 16:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Desagulier, Guillaume
2017. Clustering Methods. In Corpus Linguistics and Statistics with R [Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ],  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Structuring subjectivity in Asian Englishes. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Mark Waltermire
2019. The indicative vs. subjunctive alternation with expressions of possibility in Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Divjak, Dagmar, Nina Szymor & Anna Socha-Michalik
2015. Less is more: possibility and necessity as centres of gravity in a usage-based classification of core modals in Polish. Russian Linguistics 39:3  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Dou, Jinmeng & Meichun Liu
2023. Exploring color metaphor with Behavioral Profiles: A usage-based analysis on the metaphorical meanings of the Chinese color term bái “white”. Lingua 289  pp. 103539 ff. DOI logo
Du, Jing, Fuyin Thomas Li & Mengmin Xu
2020. Pò(‘break’),qiē(‘cut’) andkāi(‘open’) in Chinese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Fagard, Benjamin & Karolina Krawczak
2017. Les prépositions à et de et la complémentation verbale. Langages N° 206:2  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Fang, Lumin
2022. Constituency map of the alternative for Germany (AfD) vote in 2017: analysing characteristic differences via multiple correspondence analysis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30:2  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Flach, Susanne
2020. Schemas and the frequency/acceptability mismatch: Corpus distribution predicts sentence judgments. Cognitive Linguistics 31:4  pp. 609 ff. DOI logo
Gaio, Mario, Carmen Ferrajolo, Alessia Zinzi, Consiglia Riccardi, Pasquale Di Filippo, Ludovica Carangelo, Gorizio Pieretti, Francesco Rossi, Giovanni Francesco Nicoletti & Annalisa Capuano
2021. Association of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Warfarin With Haemorrhagic Risk by Applying Correspondence Analysis to Data From the Italian Pharmacovigilance Database – A Case Study. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12 DOI logo
Garraffoni, André R. S., Fabrício C. Alcântara & Hélio H. Checon
2017. Evaluating the anesthetization and fixation efficacy of “soft” and “hard” freshwater benthic meiofauna: what is the best method for specimen preservation?. Limnology 18:2  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Glynn, Dylan
2022. Chapter 8. Emergent categories. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73],  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Glynn, Dylan & Avgustina Biryukova
2022. Death, enemies, and illness: How English and Russian metaphorically conceptualise boredom. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
González Granado, Nicolás, Patrick Drouin & Aurélie Picton
2023. De l’analyse statistique à l’apprentissage automatique : le langage R au service de la terminologie. Éla. Études de linguistique appliquée N° 208:4  pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2021. Diachronic Cognitive Linguistics. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ioannou, Georgios
2017. A corpus-based analysis of the verb pleróo in Ancient Greek. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Ioannou, Georgios
2019. From Athenian fleet to prophetic eschatology. Correlating formal features to themes of discourse in Ancient Greek. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Ivanová, Martina
2024. Under pressure: Exploring the impact of cognitive factors on clitics placement in L2 Slovak. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo
Jakimowicz, Aleksander & Daniel Rzeczkowski
2019. Firm ownership and size versus innovation activities over the business cycle: near-zero inertia as a sign of the transition from the fifth to the sixth Kondratieff wave. Oeconomia Copernicana 10:4  pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Jannusch, Tim, Darren Shannon, Michaele Völler, Finbarr Murphy & Martin Mullins
2021. Smartphone Use While Driving: An Investigation of Young Novice Driver (YND) Behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 77  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Junjie & Fuyin Thomas Li
2024. A multifactorial aspectual analysis of verb concatenation with imperfective markers zhe in Mandarin. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:1  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Johansson, Christer & Per Olav Folgerø
2024. Unit 3 Lesson: Using Reaction Time and Mixed Models. In Neuroaesthetics,  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Johansson, Christer & Per Olav Folgerø
2024. Unit 4 Lab: Create Your Own Association Graphs and Correspondence Analysis Using R. In Neuroaesthetics,  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Krawczak, Karolina
2018. Reconstructing social emotions across languages and cultures. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Krawczak, Karolina
2022. Chapter 11. Modeling constructional variation. In Analogy and Contrast in Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 73],  pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Krawczak, Karolina & Dylan Glynn
2015. Operationalizing mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Lam, Chris
2014. 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lam, Chris
2016. Correspondence Analysis: A Statistical Technique Ripe for Technical and Professional Communication Researchers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 59:3  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove
2022. Grammatical stance marking across registers. Register Studies  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove, Marcus Callies, Hilde Hasselgård, Natalia Judith Laso, Sanne van Vuuren, Isabel Verdaguer & Magali Paquot
2020. Adverb placement in EFL academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 25:2  pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Larsson, Tove & Henrik Kaatari
2022. Extraposition in learner and expert writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Liimatta, Aatu
2023. Register variation across text lengths. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2  pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Meili
2023. Towards a dynamic behavioral profile of the Mandarin Chinese temperature termre: a diachronic semasiological approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:2  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Podhorodecka, Joanna
2021. Real-life pseudo-passives: The usage and discourse functions of adjunct-based passive constructions. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Pyykönen, Maria
Rogos-Hebda, Anna
2020. It’s Raining Immigrants! HELLelujah!: The Metaphors of Immigration in Early American Magazines (1828–1959). Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :29/2 DOI logo
Shao, Bin, Yingying Cai & Graeme Trousdale
2019. A Multivariate Analysis of Diachronic Variation inA Bunch of noun: A Construction Grammar Account. Journal of English Linguistics 47:2  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2018. Constructional schemas in variation. Constructions and Frames 10:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2020. Exploring the cultural conceptualization of emotions across national language varieties. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2023. <i>The Many Uses of Explain:</i>. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 32:0  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Szymor, Nina
2018. Translation: universals or cognition?. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 30:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Tahi, Mathias, Caudou Trebissou, Fabienne Ribeyre, Boguinard Sahin Guiraud, Désiré N’ da Pokou & Christian Cilas
2019. Variation in yield over time in a cacao factorial mating design: changes in heritability and longitudinal data analyses over 13 consecutive years. Euphytica 215:6 DOI logo
Tizón-Couto, David & David Lorenz
2021. Variables are valuable: making a case for deductive modeling. Linguistics 59:5  pp. 1279 ff. DOI logo
Wyroślak, Piotr
2022. No big deal: Situation-backgrounding uses of the Polish dative reflexive pronoun sobie/se . Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Wyroślak, Piotr & Dylan Glynn
2024. Disentangling constructional networks: integrating taxonomic effects into the description of grammatical alternations. Linguistics Vanguard 10:s1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Zehentner, Eva
Zhang, Zheng-sheng
2016. A multi-dimensional corpus study of mixed compounds in Chinese. In Integrating Chinese Linguistic Research and Language Teaching and Learning [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 7],  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2023. Meaning patterns of the NP de VP construction in modern Chinese: approaches of covarying collexeme analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2023. A corpus-based study of congruent and metaphorical patterns of modality in English. Studia Neophilologica 95:3  pp. 351 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.