Fictive Interaction

The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse

Author
ORCID logoEsther Pascual | University of Groningen
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027246639 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027269799 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
Google Play logo
Language is intimately related to interaction. The question arises: Is the structure of interaction somehow mirrored in language structure and use? This book suggests a positive answer to this question by examining the ubiquitous phenomenon of fictive interaction, in which non-genuine conversational turns appear in discourse, even within clauses, phrases, and lexical items (e.g. “Not happy? Money back! guarantee”). The book is based on a collection of hundreds of examples of fictive interaction at all grammatical levels from a wide variety of spoken, written, and signed languages, and from many different discourse genres. Special attention is devoted to the strategic use of fictive interaction in legal argumentation, with a focus on high-profile criminal trials. Both trial lawyers and lay jurors often present material evidence or murder victims as speaking, and express emotions and intentions in conversational terms. The book thus establishes the role of the conversational turn—rather than the sentence—as the basic unit of language, and the role of conversation as a frame that structures cognition, discourse, and grammar.
[Human Cognitive Processing, 47] 2014.  xiv, 243 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“In this incisive and highly readable study, Pascual makes a cogent and thorough case for the central status of the conversation frame in human understanding. She explores not only "the conversational turn" as the basic unit of language, but also the ways in which imaginative mental webs can create new, emergent meaning—fictive interactions, especially fictive conversations. She shows how fictive conversations populate our lives.”
“There's nothing fictive about Fictive Interaction. The book is factual and logical. It walks the reader down a path of well-reasoned explanations for how language works, across a wide range of interactive domains, including legal argumentation. Innovative and insightful!”
“People talk with each other—that’s what language is for. In this fascinating and deeply researched book Esther Pascual shows that the structures of conversational interaction leave their traces all through the grammars and lexicons of languages. We talk not only to exchange information, but also to create fictive situations in which talk is used to subtly convey intentions, evaluations, and more. Pascual explores linguistic structures of fictive interaction across a wide range of languages and contexts, all the way from the language of everyday life to murder trials, and comparing oral and written languages. In the process she proposes bold hypotheses and lays the groundwork for a linguistics based on the conversational mind, replacing the “sentence” with the “conversational turn.” A rich and important book.”
“Esther Pascual’s book is one of the most significant and original contributions to language sciences in recent times. Theoretically, she achieves a profound synthesis of socio-interactional and cognitive approaches to language. Methodologically, she places comparative, crosslinguistic ethnographic analysis of conversational interaction at the heart of the linguistic enterprise. Not only linguists, but psychologists in the dialogical and dialectical tradition stretching back to Bakhtin, Vološinov and Vygotsky, will find rich material and brilliant insights in what is sure to become a classic work.”
“This book, with its well-structured organization, approachable writing style, well-founded argumentation and profound implications, is a particularly timely contribution to Cognitive Linguistics research. Its most outstanding contribution is that it opens up a whole new research line.”
“In sum, Fictive Interaction is a “must-read book.” FI can no longer be written off as a dialectal or marginal phenomenon but rather must be included and integrated in theories of syntax, semantics, and other areas of linguistic inquiry.”
Cited by

Cited by 61 other publications

Alekseenko, Natalia Vadimovna
2021. Fictive Interaction Phenomenon in Social Advertising Discourse. Philology. Theory & Practice 14:6  pp. 1866 ff. DOI logo
Birchall, Joshua
2018. Historical change in reported speech constructions in the Chapacuran family. Journal of Historical Linguistics 8:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Brandt, Line & Esther Pascual
2016. “Say hello to this ad”. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2016. Persuading and arguing with the reader. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Dancygier, Barbara
2021. Fictive Deixis, Direct Discourse, and Viewpoint Networks. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
De Cock, Barbara & Carolina Figueras Bates
Demeter, Gusztav
2016. On discourse-motivated “sorries”. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Dornelas, Aline & Esther Pascual
2016. Echolalia as communicative strategy. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Dostie, Gaétane
2022. Statut phraséologique de quelques séquences émergentes en français parlé préfaçant une scène recréée. Langages N° 225:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
FitzGerald, William & Todd Oakley
2016. Invocation or apostrophe?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley
2020. “Hi, Mr. President!”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Fotiou, Constantina
2024. Didn’t she say to you, “Oh my God! In Pafos?”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 34:1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Gentens, Caroline, María Sol Sansiñena, Stef Spronck & An Van linden
2022. Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence, discourse-oriented and theoretical approaches. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Geurts, Bart
2021. First saying, then believing: The pragmatic roots of folk psychology. Mind & Language 36:4  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Gordejuela, Adriana
2022. Chapter 7. Beyond the limits. In Time Representations in the Perspective of Human Creativity [Human Cognitive Processing, 75],  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Guz, Wojciech & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
2023. Chapter 7. Polish że ‘that’ as an elaboration marker. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227],  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Harding, Jennifer R
2021. Epistolary cognition: The family letters of Rosalie Calvert. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Igl, Natalia
2019. Chapter 6. Framing the narrative. In Experiencing Fictional Worlds [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 32],  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Jarque, Maria Josep & Esther Pascual
2021. From gesture- and sign-in-interaction to grammar: Fictive questions for relative clauses in signed languages. Languages and Modalities 1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Jarque Moyano, Maria Josep
2016. What about?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Junior, José Carlos da Costa & Luiz Fernando Matos Rocha
2018. Compostos de discurso direto no português do Brasil: interação fictiva no léxico. Diacrítica 32:1  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Królak, Emilia
2016. Polish nominal construction involving fictive interaction. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016. Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27:4  pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Leuschner, Torsten
2016. Fictive questions in conditionals?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Lohrová, Helena & Almut Koester
2023. Formulating hypothetical talk: An action-driven approach to communicating stance in business meetings. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 140:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lou, Adrian
2017. Multimodal simile. English Text Construction 10:1  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Matos Rocha, Luiz Fernando & Pablo Arantes
Mustajoki, Arto, Tatiana Sherstinova & Ulla Tuomarla
2018. Types and functions of pseudo-dialogues. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31],  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Oakley, Todd
2017. Multimodal rhetoric: Fictive interaction strategies in political discourse. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1 DOI logo
Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal & Mark Turner
2016. Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2016. ‘Quo Vadimus?’ from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:1  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Pascual, Esther, Aline Dornelas & Todd Oakley
2017. When “Goal!” means ‘soccer’. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Pascual, Esther & Emilia Królak
2018. The‘listen to characters thinking’novel. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 399 ff. DOI logo
PASCUAL, ESTHER & BÁRBARA MARQUETA GRACIA
2023. Viewpointed morphology: A unified account of Spanish verb-complement compounds as fictive interaction structures. Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler
2016. Fictive interaction and the conversation frame. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Perkins, Marla
2022. Parity lost. Language and Dialogue 12:1  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
QIU, SIQI & YIRUI LIANG
2018. Esther Pascual and Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2016. Pp. 384. ISBN 978-90-272-4671-4 (Hb), 978-90-272-6650-7 (E-book). Language and Cognition 10:3  pp. 544 ff. DOI logo
Rocha, Luiz Fernando Matos, Sandra Aparecida Faria de Almeida & Luciana Andrade Paula
2023. Discurso direto fictivo. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 65  pp. e023003 ff. DOI logo
Sandler, Sergeiy
2016. Fictive interaction and the nature of linguistic meaning. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Sandler, Sergeiy & Esther Pascual
2019. In the beginning there was conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Spronck, Stef
2016. Evidential fictive interaction (in Ungarinyin and Russian). In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
2021. In a Manner of Speaking: How Reported Speech May Have Shaped Grammar. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Sullivan, Karen
2016. Silent abstractions versus “Look at me” drawings. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Tantucci, Vittorio
2021. Language and Social Minds, DOI logo
van der Voort, Hein
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2017.  Isabelle Buchstaller , Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. Pp. xviii +306. ISBN 9780470657188.. English Language and Linguistics 21:1  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2019. Changing perspectives. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2021. Creative constructs, constructions, and frames in Internet discourse. Constructions and Frames 13:1  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2023. Constructions of speech and thought representation. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:2 DOI logo
Versluis, Christine & Lou-Ann Kleppa
Wilson, Anna
2020. It’s Time to Do News Again. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4  pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian
2016. Real, imaginary, or fictive?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55],  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian & Bosen Ma
2020. Chapter 12. How can I persuade you without making self-assertions?. In Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 13],  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual
2022. Debate with zhuangzi. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Xiang, Mingjian, Esther Pascual & Bosen Ma
2022. Who’s speaking for whom?. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yi
2021. Metaphor in Science Communication: With Special Reference to Jade Rabbit of the Moon Rover. Science Communication 43:6  pp. 719 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Yushan
2018. E. Pascual & S. Sandler (Eds.). The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2  pp. 537 ff. DOI logo
Zima, Elisabeth & Alexander Bergs
2017. Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1 DOI logo
ZIMA, ELISABETH & GEERT BRÔNE
2015. Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition 7:4  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014017624 | Marc record